Assessment of Psychological Disturbance in Patients with Tooth Loss: A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools

被引:18
|
作者
Kudsi, Zaki [1 ]
Fenlon, Michael R. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Johal, Ama [5 ,6 ]
Baysan, Aylin [7 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas Hosp NHSFT, Prosthodont, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas Hosp NHSFT, Restorat Dent, London, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas Hosp NHSFT, Restorat Dent & Special Care Dent Serv, London, England
[5] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, Ctr Lead Bioengn, London, England
[6] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, Orthodont, London, England
[7] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Dent, Oral Bioengn, London, England
关键词
Psychological disturbance; removable dentures; tooth loss; ANXIETY STRESS SCALES; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; DEPRESSION SEVERITY; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; HEALTH; VALIDITY; PEOPLE; PHQ-9; DASS;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13141
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose To systematically review the available evidence on screening tools to detect the psychological disturbance in patients with tooth loss and technically successful removable dentures (partial and complete). Materials and Methods The study protocol was registered with the National Institute of Health Research Database (I.D. CRD42017082125). The PICOS tool (patients, intervention, control, outcomes measure, and study design) was used to formulate an effective search strategy. Participants were adults (>= 18), who were edentulous or had significant tooth loss (< 9 remaining teeth). The intervention included undergoing replacement with technically successful dentures (partial or complete). A control group of adults were either edentulous or had significant tooth loss and without dentures. Outcomes included assessing psychological disturbance due to treatment with dentures or due to no treatment using a validated tool. A structured search strategy was used to complete a standard systematic search of the electronic database without any date limit and/or language restriction. Only quantitative studies using a validated measuring tool to screen for psychological distress in adults with significant tooth loss were included. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. Data homogeneity was assessed in regards to the screening tools to measure psychological disturbance following the management of tooth loss with dentures. The significant level was set at 0.05, using IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0 (SPSS Inc., New York, NY). The psychometric properties and the validation processes of the screening tools were assessed. Results From the original 3510 studies identified, only eight studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria. All eight studies used the same questionnaire to screen for the emotional distress of tooth loss. In addition, one study also used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to screen for the association of depression with tooth loss. Six studies suggested that a significant number of patients have difficulties in accepting tooth loss, were less confident, and had emotional distress related to tooth loss. However, two studies reported no significant link. All studies found a marked impact on functional activities and social interaction. However, four studies had a potentially biased selection process, and the questionnaire used was assessed to be at high-risk of measurement bias, as the development and validation process was not clear. There was also a lack of well-defined control groups in all studies. Conclusion Tooth loss could cause psychological disturbance in some patients. To date, there is a lack of available tools that are suitable to screen and measure psychological disturbance in patients with tooth loss. Additional research is required to develop tools to identify and measure such impact and to recommend suitable interventions when needed.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 200
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Coping Assessment Tools in the Family Caregivers of Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Noveiri, Marzieh Jahani Sayad
    Shamsaei, Farshid
    Khodaveisi, Masoud
    Vanaki, Zohreh
    Tapak, Lily
    BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2020, 12 : 11 - 26
  • [32] A Systematic Review of the Assessment Tools Used to Measure Metamemory in Patients with Brain Injury
    Cha, Sumin
    Yang, Yeongae
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2014, 26 (10) : 1649 - 1655
  • [33] Measurement properties of assessment tools of Kinesophobia in patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review
    Jia, Yingying
    Cui, Nianqi
    Jia, Tingting
    Hamoudi, Hammza Jabbar Abdl Sattar
    Song, Jianping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2024, 11 (01) : 57 - 65
  • [34] Identification of Tools for the Functional and Subjective Assessment of Patients in an Aquatic Environment: A Systematic Review
    Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio
    Martin-Martin, Jaime
    Gonzalez-Sanchez, Manuel
    Antonio Merchan-Baeza, Jose
    Perez-Cruzado, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (16) : 1 - 14
  • [35] Holistic needs assessment in brain cancer patients: A systematic review of available tools
    Afseth, Janyne
    Neubeck, Lis
    Karatzias, Thanos
    Grant, Robin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2019, 28 (03)
  • [36] Pain assessment tools for unconscious or sedated intensive care patients: a systematic review
    Pudas-Tahka, Sanna-Mari
    Axelin, Anna
    Aantaa, Riku
    Lund, Vesa
    Salantera, Sanna
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2009, 65 (05) : 946 - 956
  • [37] Observational gait assessment tools in paediatrics - A systematic review
    Rathinam, Chandrasekar
    Bateman, Andrew
    Peirson, Janet
    Skinner, Jane
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2014, 40 (02) : 279 - 285
  • [38] A systematic review of the psychometric properties of bronchiolitis assessment tools
    Davies, Clare J.
    Waters, Donna
    Marshall, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (02) : 286 - 301
  • [39] A systematic review of performance assessment tools for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Yusuke Watanabe
    Elif Bilgic
    Ekaterina Lebedeva
    Katherine M. McKendy
    Liane S. Feldman
    Gerald M. Fried
    Melina C. Vassiliou
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 832 - 844
  • [40] Teamwork Assessment Tools in Obstetric Emergencies A Systematic Review
    Onwochei, Desire N.
    Halpern, Stephen
    Balki, Mrinalini
    SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2017, 12 (03): : 165 - 176