Dose monitoring and output correction for the effects of scanning field changes with uniform scanning proton beam

被引:1
|
作者
Zhao, Qingya [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Huanmei [3 ]
Cheng, Chee-Wai [1 ,4 ]
Das, Indra J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] IUHPTC, Bloomington, IN 47408 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] IUPUI, Purdue Sch Engn & Technol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
uniform scanning proton beam; dose monitor; stem effect; proton output calculation; BRAGG PEAK FIELDS; UNIT CALCULATIONS; THERAPY; DOSIMETRY; RANGE;
D O I
10.1118/1.3609417
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The output of a proton beam is affected by proton energy, Spread-Out Bragg Peak (SOBP) width, aperture size, dose rate, and the point of measurement. In a uniform scanning proton beam (USPB), the scanning field size is adjusted (including the vertical length and the horizontal width) according to the treatment field size with appropriate margins to reduce secondary neutron production. Different scanning field settings result in beam output variations that are investigated in this study. Methods: The measurements are performed with a parallel plate Markus chamber at the center of SOBP under the reference condition with 16 cm range, 10 cm SOBP, and 5 cm air gap. The effect of dose rate on field output is studied by varying proton beam current from 0.5 to 7 nA. The effects of scanning field settings are studied by varying independently the field width and length from 12 x 12 to 30 x 30 cm(2). Results: The results demonstrate that scanning field variations can produce output variation up to 3.80%. In addition, larger output variation is observed with scanning field changes along the stem direction of the patient dose monitor (PDM). By investigating the underlying physics of incomplete charge collection and the stem effects of the PDM, an analytical model is proposed to calculate USPB output with consideration of the scanning field area and the PDM stem length that is irradiated. The average absolute difference between the measured output and calculated output using our new correction model are within 0.13 and 0.08% for the 20 and 30 cm snouts, respectively. Conclusions: This study proposes a correction model for accurate USPB output calculation, which takes account of scanning field settings and the PDM stem effects. This model may be used to extend the existing output calculation model from one snout size to other snout sizes with customized scanning field settings. The study is especially useful for calculating field output for treatment without individualized patient specific measurements. (C) 2011 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3609417]
引用
收藏
页码:4655 / 4661
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Skin Dose in Proton Pencil Beam Scanning for Pediatric Patients
    Axente, M.
    Moskvin, V.
    Shin, J.
    Tsiamas, P.
    Merchant, T.
    Farr, J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3498 - 3498
  • [22] Determination of surface dose in pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Kern, A.
    Baeumer, C.
    Kroeninger, K.
    Mertens, L.
    Timmermann, B.
    Walbersloh, J.
    Wulff, J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (05) : 2277 - 2288
  • [23] Therapeutic uniform scanning proton beam development and characterization: Longitudinal results
    Mascia, A.
    Farr, J.
    Hsi, W.
    Allgower, C.
    Nichiporov, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2632 - 2632
  • [24] Therapeutic uniform scanning proton beam development and characterization: Transverse results
    Farr, J.
    Mascia, A.
    Allgower, C.
    Hsi, W.
    Anferov, V.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2575 - 2575
  • [25] Commissioning of Proton Beam Uniform Scanning for a Commercial Treatment Planning System
    Egan, A.
    Maes, D.
    Nevitt, T.
    Leuro, E.
    Fung, A.
    Regmi, R.
    Bloch, C.
    Saini, J.
    Taddei, P.
    Bowen, S.
    Janson, M.
    Wong, T.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E722 - E722
  • [26] Comparing the Effects of Tumor Motion Patterns and Beam Delivery Timing Between Scattering and Uniform Scanning Proton Beam
    Zhao, Q.
    Wu, H.
    Cheng, C.
    Das, I.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [27] Dose Calibration and Integral Depth Dose Correction of An Analytical Dose Calculation Algorithm for Collimated Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Bennett, L.
    Erhart, K.
    Nelson, N.
    Yu, J.
    Gutierrez, A.
    Rana, S.
    Smith, B.
    Hill, P.
    Hyer, D.
    Geoghegan, T.
    Patwardhan, K.
    Culberson, W.
    Flynn, R.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E857 - E857
  • [28] Silicon Diode Measurements of Output Field Size Factors for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning with a Dedicated Nozzle
    McGlade, J.
    Lin, L.
    Solberg, T.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3496 - 3496
  • [29] A comparison of the dose distributions from three proton treatment planning systems in the planning of meningioma patients with single-field uniform dose pencil beam scanning
    Doolan, Paul J.
    Alshaikhi, Jailan
    Rosenberg, Ivan
    Ainsley, Christopher G.
    Gibson, Adam
    D'Souza, Derek
    Bentefour, El Hassane
    Royle, Gary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (01): : 86 - 99
  • [30] Dosimetric Interplay Effects for Proton Uniform Scanning Lung Treatments
    Flampouri, S.
    Slopsema, R.
    Su, Z.
    Ho, M.
    Li, Z.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)