How natural capital delivers ecosystem services: A typology derived from a systematic review

被引:115
|
作者
Smith, A. C. [1 ]
Harrison, P. A. [2 ]
Soba, M. Perez [3 ]
Archaux, F. [4 ]
Blicharska, M. [5 ,6 ]
Egoh, B. N. [7 ,8 ]
Eros, T. [9 ]
Domenech, N. Fabrega [10 ]
Gyorgy, A. I. [9 ]
Haines-Young, R. [11 ]
Li, S. [1 ]
Lommelen, E. [12 ]
Meiresonne, L. [12 ]
Ayala, L. Miguel [3 ]
Mononen, L. [13 ]
Simpson, G. [1 ]
Stange, E. [14 ]
Turkelboom, F. [12 ]
Uiterwijk, M. [3 ]
Veerkamp, C. J. [15 ,16 ]
de Echeverria, V. Wyllie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Dyson Perrins Bldg,South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[2] Lancaster Environm Ctr, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lib Ave, Lancaster LA1 4AP, England
[3] Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen Environm Res, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Irstea, UR EFNO, F-45290 Domaine Des Barres, Nogent Sur Vern, France
[5] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Aquat Sci & Assessment, Box 7050, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Nat Resources & Sustainable Dev, Villavagen 16, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
[7] CSIR, Nat Resources & Environm, POB 320, ZA-7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[8] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Agr Earth & Environm Sci, 27 Private Bag X01, ZA-3209 Scottsville, South Africa
[9] MTA Ctr Ecol Res, Klebelsberg Ku 3, H-8237 Tihany, Hungary
[10] European Commiss, JRC, IES, Seville, Spain
[11] Fabis Consulting Ltd, Barton IN Fabis, Nottingham NG11 0AE, England
[12] Res Inst Nat & Forest INBO, Kliniekstr 25, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[13] SYKE, Finnish Environm Inst, Mechelininkatu 34,POB 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland
[14] Norwegian Inst Nat Res NINA, Vormstuguvegen 40, NO-2624 Lillehammer, Norway
[15] Wageningen Univ, Environm Syst Anal Grp, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[16] PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, POB 30314, NL-2500 GH The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
Biodiversity; Functional diversity; Trait; Attribute; Trade-offs; Land management; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; CARBON STORAGE; LAND-USE; PRACTICAL APPLICATION; LINKING BIODIVERSITY; CROP BIODIVERSITY; SOIL-EROSION; HONEY-BEES; DIVERSITY; FOREST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
There is no unified evidence base to help decision-makers understand how the multiple components of natural capital interact to deliver ecosystem services. We systematically reviewed 780 papers, recording how natural capital attributes (29 biotic attributes and 11 abiotic factors) affect the delivery of 13 ecosystem services. We develop a simple typology based on the observation that five main attribute groups influence the capacity of natural capital to provide ecosystem services, related to: A) the physical amount of vegetation cover; B) presence of suitable habitat to support species or functional groups that provide a service; C) characteristics of particular species or functional groups; D) physical and biological diversity; and E) abiotic factors that interact with the biotic factors in groups A-D. ` Bundles' of services can be identified that are governed by different attribute groups. Management aimed at maximising only one service often has negative impacts on other services and on biological and physical diversity. Sustainable ecosystem management should aim to maintain healthy, diverse and resilient ecosystems that can deliver a wide range of ecosystem services in the long term. This can maximise the synergies and minimise the trade-offs between ecosystem services and is also compatible with the aim of conserving biodiversity. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 126
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ecosystem Services in the Milpa System: A Systematic Review
    Romero-Natale, Aline
    Acevedo-Sandoval, Otilio Arturo
    Sanchez-Porras, Arturo
    ONE ECOSYSTEM, 2024, 9
  • [32] How financial mechanisms can incentivize provision of ecosystem services from land restoration: A systematic review protocol
    Grigoriadis, Vasilis
    Gold, Elizabeth
    Hutchinson, George
    Frewer, Lynn J. J.
    Brereton, Paul
    Flannery, Darragh
    Byrne, Kenneth A. A.
    Garvey, John
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (07):
  • [33] Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: A systematic review
    Yang, Y. C. Ethan
    Passarelli, Simone
    Lovell, Robin J.
    Ringler, Claudia
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 31 : 58 - 67
  • [34] Remote sensing of ecosystem services: A systematic review
    Barbosa, Caio C. de Araujo
    Atkinson, Peter M.
    Dearing, John A.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 52 : 430 - 443
  • [35] Mapping lake ecosystem services: A systematic review
    Inacio, Miguel
    Barcelo, Damia
    Zhao, Wenwu
    Pereira, Paulo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 847
  • [36] The International Landscape of Medical Licensing Examinations: A Typology Derived From a Systematic Review
    Price, Tristan
    Lynn, Nick
    Coombes, Lee
    Roberts, Martin
    Gale, Tom
    de Bere, Sam Regan
    Archer, Julian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 7 (09): : 782 - 790
  • [37] Linking natural capital stocks with ecosystem services in the Northern Baltic Sea
    Jernberg, Susanna
    Kuosa, Harri
    Bostrom, Christoffer
    Burdon, Daryl
    Haavisto, Fiia
    Heiskanen, Anna-Stiina
    Kiviluoto, Suvi
    Kuningas, Sanna
    Kunnasranta, Mervi
    Uusitalo, Laura
    Villnas, Anna
    Westerbom, Mats
    Kostamo, Kirsi
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 65
  • [38] The Potential of Natural Capital to Provide Provisioning Ecosystem Services in Slovak Regions
    Makovnikova, Jarmila
    Palka, Boris
    Kolosta, Stanislav
    Flaska, Filip
    26TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON REGIONAL SCIENCES, 2023, : 174 - 181
  • [39] A conservation industry for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes
    Yang, Wanhong
    Bryan, Brett A.
    MacDonald, Darla Hatton
    Ward, John R.
    Wells, Geoff
    Crossman, Neville D.
    Connor, Jeffrey D.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (04) : 680 - 689
  • [40] Why not to calculate the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
    Toman, M
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 25 (01) : 57 - 60