How natural capital delivers ecosystem services: A typology derived from a systematic review

被引:115
|
作者
Smith, A. C. [1 ]
Harrison, P. A. [2 ]
Soba, M. Perez [3 ]
Archaux, F. [4 ]
Blicharska, M. [5 ,6 ]
Egoh, B. N. [7 ,8 ]
Eros, T. [9 ]
Domenech, N. Fabrega [10 ]
Gyorgy, A. I. [9 ]
Haines-Young, R. [11 ]
Li, S. [1 ]
Lommelen, E. [12 ]
Meiresonne, L. [12 ]
Ayala, L. Miguel [3 ]
Mononen, L. [13 ]
Simpson, G. [1 ]
Stange, E. [14 ]
Turkelboom, F. [12 ]
Uiterwijk, M. [3 ]
Veerkamp, C. J. [15 ,16 ]
de Echeverria, V. Wyllie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Dyson Perrins Bldg,South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[2] Lancaster Environm Ctr, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lib Ave, Lancaster LA1 4AP, England
[3] Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen Environm Res, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Irstea, UR EFNO, F-45290 Domaine Des Barres, Nogent Sur Vern, France
[5] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Aquat Sci & Assessment, Box 7050, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Nat Resources & Sustainable Dev, Villavagen 16, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
[7] CSIR, Nat Resources & Environm, POB 320, ZA-7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[8] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Agr Earth & Environm Sci, 27 Private Bag X01, ZA-3209 Scottsville, South Africa
[9] MTA Ctr Ecol Res, Klebelsberg Ku 3, H-8237 Tihany, Hungary
[10] European Commiss, JRC, IES, Seville, Spain
[11] Fabis Consulting Ltd, Barton IN Fabis, Nottingham NG11 0AE, England
[12] Res Inst Nat & Forest INBO, Kliniekstr 25, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[13] SYKE, Finnish Environm Inst, Mechelininkatu 34,POB 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland
[14] Norwegian Inst Nat Res NINA, Vormstuguvegen 40, NO-2624 Lillehammer, Norway
[15] Wageningen Univ, Environm Syst Anal Grp, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[16] PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, POB 30314, NL-2500 GH The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
Biodiversity; Functional diversity; Trait; Attribute; Trade-offs; Land management; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; CARBON STORAGE; LAND-USE; PRACTICAL APPLICATION; LINKING BIODIVERSITY; CROP BIODIVERSITY; SOIL-EROSION; HONEY-BEES; DIVERSITY; FOREST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
There is no unified evidence base to help decision-makers understand how the multiple components of natural capital interact to deliver ecosystem services. We systematically reviewed 780 papers, recording how natural capital attributes (29 biotic attributes and 11 abiotic factors) affect the delivery of 13 ecosystem services. We develop a simple typology based on the observation that five main attribute groups influence the capacity of natural capital to provide ecosystem services, related to: A) the physical amount of vegetation cover; B) presence of suitable habitat to support species or functional groups that provide a service; C) characteristics of particular species or functional groups; D) physical and biological diversity; and E) abiotic factors that interact with the biotic factors in groups A-D. ` Bundles' of services can be identified that are governed by different attribute groups. Management aimed at maximising only one service often has negative impacts on other services and on biological and physical diversity. Sustainable ecosystem management should aim to maintain healthy, diverse and resilient ecosystems that can deliver a wide range of ecosystem services in the long term. This can maximise the synergies and minimise the trade-offs between ecosystem services and is also compatible with the aim of conserving biodiversity. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 126
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of ecosystem services and natural capital dynamics in agroecosystems
    Dardonville, Manon
    Legrand, Baptiste
    Clivot, Hugues
    Bernardin, Claire
    Bockstaller, Christian
    Therond, Olivier
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 54
  • [22] Managing Natural Capital Stocks for the Provision of Ecosystem Services
    Maseyk, Fleur J. F.
    Mackay, Alec D.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Dominati, Estelle J.
    Buckley, Yvonne M.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (02): : 211 - 220
  • [23] Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services
    Raymond, Christopher M.
    Bryan, Brett A.
    MacDonald, Darla Hatton
    Cast, Andrea
    Strathearn, Sarah
    Grandgirard, Agnes
    Kalivas, Tina
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (05) : 1301 - 1315
  • [24] Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review of Provisioning and Cultural Ecosystem Services in Estuaries
    Booi, Sipesihle
    Mishi, Syden
    Andersen, Oddgeir
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [25] A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils
    Dominati, Estelle
    Patterson, Murray
    Mackay, Alec
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (09) : 1858 - 1868
  • [26] EDITORIAL: Ecological science for ecosystem services and the stewardship of Natural Capital
    Hails, Rosemary S.
    Ormerod, Steve J.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2013, 50 (04) : 807 - 811
  • [27] Marine natural capital and ecosystem services: An environmental accounting model
    Buonocore, Elvira
    Donnarumma, Luigia
    Appolloni, Luca
    Miccio, Antonino
    Russo, Giovanni F.
    Franzese, Pier Paolo
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2020, 424
  • [28] Editorial: Operationalisation of natural capital and ecosystem services - Special issue
    van Dijk, Jiska
    Dick, Jan
    Harrison, Paula
    Jax, Kurt
    Saarikoski, Heli
    Furman, Eeva
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 29 : 411 - 414
  • [29] Understanding the integration of ecosystem services and natural capital in Scottish policy
    Claret, Clement
    Metzger, Marc J.
    Kettunen, Marianne
    ten Brink, Patrick
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2018, 88 : 32 - 38
  • [30] Ecosystem services of urban rivers: a systematic review
    Sousa, Maria Carolina
    Martins, Rita
    Simoes, Nuno Eduardo
    Feio, Maria Joao
    AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2025, 87 (01)