How natural capital delivers ecosystem services: A typology derived from a systematic review

被引:115
|
作者
Smith, A. C. [1 ]
Harrison, P. A. [2 ]
Soba, M. Perez [3 ]
Archaux, F. [4 ]
Blicharska, M. [5 ,6 ]
Egoh, B. N. [7 ,8 ]
Eros, T. [9 ]
Domenech, N. Fabrega [10 ]
Gyorgy, A. I. [9 ]
Haines-Young, R. [11 ]
Li, S. [1 ]
Lommelen, E. [12 ]
Meiresonne, L. [12 ]
Ayala, L. Miguel [3 ]
Mononen, L. [13 ]
Simpson, G. [1 ]
Stange, E. [14 ]
Turkelboom, F. [12 ]
Uiterwijk, M. [3 ]
Veerkamp, C. J. [15 ,16 ]
de Echeverria, V. Wyllie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Dyson Perrins Bldg,South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[2] Lancaster Environm Ctr, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lib Ave, Lancaster LA1 4AP, England
[3] Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen Environm Res, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Irstea, UR EFNO, F-45290 Domaine Des Barres, Nogent Sur Vern, France
[5] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Aquat Sci & Assessment, Box 7050, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Nat Resources & Sustainable Dev, Villavagen 16, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
[7] CSIR, Nat Resources & Environm, POB 320, ZA-7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[8] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Agr Earth & Environm Sci, 27 Private Bag X01, ZA-3209 Scottsville, South Africa
[9] MTA Ctr Ecol Res, Klebelsberg Ku 3, H-8237 Tihany, Hungary
[10] European Commiss, JRC, IES, Seville, Spain
[11] Fabis Consulting Ltd, Barton IN Fabis, Nottingham NG11 0AE, England
[12] Res Inst Nat & Forest INBO, Kliniekstr 25, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[13] SYKE, Finnish Environm Inst, Mechelininkatu 34,POB 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland
[14] Norwegian Inst Nat Res NINA, Vormstuguvegen 40, NO-2624 Lillehammer, Norway
[15] Wageningen Univ, Environm Syst Anal Grp, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[16] PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, POB 30314, NL-2500 GH The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
Biodiversity; Functional diversity; Trait; Attribute; Trade-offs; Land management; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; CARBON STORAGE; LAND-USE; PRACTICAL APPLICATION; LINKING BIODIVERSITY; CROP BIODIVERSITY; SOIL-EROSION; HONEY-BEES; DIVERSITY; FOREST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
There is no unified evidence base to help decision-makers understand how the multiple components of natural capital interact to deliver ecosystem services. We systematically reviewed 780 papers, recording how natural capital attributes (29 biotic attributes and 11 abiotic factors) affect the delivery of 13 ecosystem services. We develop a simple typology based on the observation that five main attribute groups influence the capacity of natural capital to provide ecosystem services, related to: A) the physical amount of vegetation cover; B) presence of suitable habitat to support species or functional groups that provide a service; C) characteristics of particular species or functional groups; D) physical and biological diversity; and E) abiotic factors that interact with the biotic factors in groups A-D. ` Bundles' of services can be identified that are governed by different attribute groups. Management aimed at maximising only one service often has negative impacts on other services and on biological and physical diversity. Sustainable ecosystem management should aim to maintain healthy, diverse and resilient ecosystems that can deliver a wide range of ecosystem services in the long term. This can maximise the synergies and minimise the trade-offs between ecosystem services and is also compatible with the aim of conserving biodiversity. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 126
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Recreational fisheries in the UK: natural capital, ecosystem services, threats, and management
    Ian J. Winfield
    Fisheries Science, 2016, 82 : 203 - 212
  • [43] Response to Robinson and Lebron - Learning from complementary approaches to soil natural capital and ecosystem services
    Dominate, Estelle
    Patterson, Murray
    Mackay, Alec
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 70 (02) : 139 - 140
  • [44] The confused position of the geosciences within the "natural capital" and "ecosystem services" approaches
    Gray, Murray
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 34 : 106 - 112
  • [45] A Sustainable Urban Framework Based on Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services Accounting
    Chen, Haonan
    Shi, Yu
    He, Haomiao
    APPLIED SPATIAL ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [46] Recreational fisheries in the UK: natural capital, ecosystem services, threats, and management
    Winfield, Ian J.
    FISHERIES SCIENCE, 2016, 82 (02) : 203 - 212
  • [47] Valuing Supporting Soil Ecosystem Services in Agriculture: A Natural Capital Approach
    Brady, Mark V.
    Hedlund, Katarina
    Cong, Rong-Gang
    Hemerik, Lia
    Hotes, Stefan
    Machado, Stephen
    Mattsson, Lennart
    Schulz, Elke
    Thomsen, Ingrid K.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2015, 107 (05) : 1809 - 1821
  • [48] Advances in Ecosystem Services Valuation Studies in India: Learnings from a Systematic Review
    Bhuvan Chopra
    Y. S. C. Khuman
    Shalini Dhyani
    Anthropocene Science, 2022, 1 (3): : 342 - 357
  • [49] Social benefits of river restoration from ecosystem services perspective: A systematic review
    Basak, Sayantani M.
    Hossain, Md Sarwar
    Tusznio, Joanna
    Grodzinska-Jurczak, Malgorzata
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 124 : 90 - 100
  • [50] How to calculate the spatial distribution of ecosystem services - Natural attenuation as example from The Netherlands
    van Wijnen, H. J.
    Rutgers, M.
    Schouten, A. J.
    Mulder, C.
    de Zwart, D.
    Breure, A. M.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 415 : 49 - 55