Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: A systematic review

被引:90
|
作者
Yang, Y. C. Ethan [1 ]
Passarelli, Simone [2 ]
Lovell, Robin J. [3 ]
Ringler, Claudia [4 ]
机构
[1] Lehigh Univ, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Cambridge, MA USA
[3] Manhattan Coll, Riverdale, NY USA
[4] Int Food Policy Res Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
Ecosystem valuation; Gender equity; Sustainable Development Goals; GAOLIGONGSHAN NATURE-RESERVE; LAND-USE DECISIONS; URBAN PARKS; MANAGEMENT; FORESTS; CONSERVATION; COMMUNITY; WATER; BIODIVERSITY; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.015
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Women and men often have differential access to and derive different benefits from ecosystem services; therefore, their perception and knowledge of ecosystem services also differ. Understanding these differences is critical to ensuring that policies aimed at enhancing access to and use of ecosystem services can provide benefits to all genders. We conducted a systematic review of studies that aim to understand the relationship between gender and ecosystem service perceptions to summarize research from this emerging topic and to identify patterns between gender and ecosystem service perceptions from different case studies. The results show that highly gendered ecosystem services include medicinal products from forest or mangrove ecosystems and freshwater supply. Women have a stronger perception of water quality and erosion control, soil formation, habitat conservation and sustaining biodiversity. Men, on the other hand, had more knowledge of fuel and timber and extreme event mitigation services. Our review also identifies the limitations of sample size for this interdisciplinary topic, calls for more case studies and comparative studies to identify relationships between gender and ecosystem service perceptions, and calls for the development of models on ecosystem services that incorporate gender. Finally, we discuss how our review can augment existing gender frameworks for policymaking. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 67
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review of Provisioning and Cultural Ecosystem Services in Estuaries
    Booi, Sipesihle
    Mishi, Syden
    Andersen, Oddgeir
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [2] The Gendered Nature of Ecosystem Services
    Fortnam, M.
    Brown, K.
    Chaigneau, T.
    Crona, B.
    Daw, T. M.
    Goncalves, D.
    Hicks, C.
    Revmatas, M.
    Sandbrook, C.
    Schulte-Herbruggen, B.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 159 : 312 - 325
  • [3] Ecosystem services of urban rivers: a systematic review
    Sousa, Maria Carolina
    Martins, Rita
    Simoes, Nuno Eduardo
    Feio, Maria Joao
    AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2025, 87 (01)
  • [4] Ecosystem Services in the Milpa System: A Systematic Review
    Romero-Natale, Aline
    Acevedo-Sandoval, Otilio Arturo
    Sanchez-Porras, Arturo
    ONE ECOSYSTEM, 2024, 9
  • [5] Remote sensing of ecosystem services: A systematic review
    Barbosa, Caio C. de Araujo
    Atkinson, Peter M.
    Dearing, John A.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 52 : 430 - 443
  • [6] Mapping lake ecosystem services: A systematic review
    Inacio, Miguel
    Barcelo, Damia
    Zhao, Wenwu
    Pereira, Paulo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 847
  • [7] CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND VALUATION METHODS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Marquez, Laura Andreina Matos
    Castro, Joana D'Arc Bardella
    Martins, Emilly Layne
    ANUARIO TURISMO Y SOCIEDAD, 2024, 34 : 111 - 126
  • [8] A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing
    Kosanic, Aleksandra
    Petzold, Jan
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 45
  • [9] A systematic review on the ecosystem services provided by green infrastructure
    Jato-Espino, Daniel
    Capra-Ribeiro, Fabio
    Moscardo, Vanessa
    Mayor-Vitoria, Fernando
    Gallardo, Laura O.
    Carracedo, Patricia
    Dietrich, Kristin
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2023, 86
  • [10] Systematic review of soil ecosystem services in tropical regions
    Rodrigues, Aline F.
    Latawiec, Agnieszka E.
    Reid, Brian J.
    Solorzano, Alexandro
    Schuler, Azeneth E.
    Lacerda, Carine
    Fidalgo, Elaine C. C.
    Scarano, Fabio R.
    Tubenchlak, Fernanda
    Pena, Ingrid
    Vicente-Vicente, Jose Luis
    Korys, Katarzyna A.
    Cooper, Miguel
    Fernandes, Nelson F.
    Prado, Rachel B.
    Maioli, Veronica
    Dib, Viviane
    Teixeira, Wenceslau G.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 8 (03):