Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: A systematic review

被引:90
|
作者
Yang, Y. C. Ethan [1 ]
Passarelli, Simone [2 ]
Lovell, Robin J. [3 ]
Ringler, Claudia [4 ]
机构
[1] Lehigh Univ, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Cambridge, MA USA
[3] Manhattan Coll, Riverdale, NY USA
[4] Int Food Policy Res Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
Ecosystem valuation; Gender equity; Sustainable Development Goals; GAOLIGONGSHAN NATURE-RESERVE; LAND-USE DECISIONS; URBAN PARKS; MANAGEMENT; FORESTS; CONSERVATION; COMMUNITY; WATER; BIODIVERSITY; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.015
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Women and men often have differential access to and derive different benefits from ecosystem services; therefore, their perception and knowledge of ecosystem services also differ. Understanding these differences is critical to ensuring that policies aimed at enhancing access to and use of ecosystem services can provide benefits to all genders. We conducted a systematic review of studies that aim to understand the relationship between gender and ecosystem service perceptions to summarize research from this emerging topic and to identify patterns between gender and ecosystem service perceptions from different case studies. The results show that highly gendered ecosystem services include medicinal products from forest or mangrove ecosystems and freshwater supply. Women have a stronger perception of water quality and erosion control, soil formation, habitat conservation and sustaining biodiversity. Men, on the other hand, had more knowledge of fuel and timber and extreme event mitigation services. Our review also identifies the limitations of sample size for this interdisciplinary topic, calls for more case studies and comparative studies to identify relationships between gender and ecosystem service perceptions, and calls for the development of models on ecosystem services that incorporate gender. Finally, we discuss how our review can augment existing gender frameworks for policymaking. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 67
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Status, approaches, and challenges of ecosystem services exploration in Ethiopia: A systematic review
    Amberber, Mekonnen
    Argaw, Mekuria
    Feyisa, Gudina Legese
    Degefa, Sileshi
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF POPULATION RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 18 (03) : 201 - 213
  • [42] Ecosystem services of tree windbreaks in rural landscapes-a systematic review
    Weninger, T.
    Scheper, S.
    Lackoova, L.
    Kitzler, B.
    Gartner, K.
    King, N. W.
    Cornelis, W.
    Strauss, P.
    Michel, K.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (10)
  • [43] Status, approaches, and challenges of ecosystem services exploration in Ethiopia: A systematic review
    Mekonnen Amberber
    Mekuria Argaw
    Gudina Legese Feyisa
    Sileshi Degefa
    Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment, 2020, (03) : 201 - 213
  • [44] The Ecosystem Services and Green Infrastructure: A Systematic Review and the Gap of Economic Valuation
    Ersoy Mirici, Merve
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [45] The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research: a systematic review
    Ľuboš Slovák
    Jan Daněk
    Tomáš Daněk
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10
  • [46] Trends in valuation approaches for cultural ecosystem services: A systematic literature review
    Matos Marquez, Laura Andreina
    Rezende, Eva Caroline Nunes
    Machado, Karine Borges
    do Nascimento, Emilly Layne Martins
    Castro, Joana D. 'arc Bardella
    Nabout, Joao Carlos
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 64
  • [47] Valuating Natural Resources and Ecosystem Services: Systematic Review of Methods in Use
    Ignatyeva, Margarita
    Yurak, Vera
    Dushin, Alexey
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [48] Grassland ecosystem services: a systematic review of research advances and future directions
    Yuanyuan Zhao
    Zhifeng Liu
    Jianguo Wu
    Landscape Ecology, 2020, 35 : 793 - 814
  • [49] The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research: a systematic review
    Slovak, Lubos
    Danek, Jan
    Danek, Tomas
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [50] Benefits of green roofs: A systematic review of the evidence for three ecosystem services
    Francis, Lotte Fjendbo Moller
    Jensen, Marina Bergen
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2017, 28 : 167 - 176