The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research: a systematic review

被引:4
|
作者
Slovak, Lubos [1 ,2 ]
Danek, Jan [1 ,3 ]
Danek, Tomas [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Czech Acad Sci, Global Change Res Inst, Brno, Czech Republic
[2] Masaryk Univ, Fac Social Studies, Dept Environm Studies, Brno, Czech Republic
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Humanities, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Palacky Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Dev & Environm Studies, Olomouc, Czech Republic
来源
关键词
NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS; VALUES; CLASSIFICATION; CONSERVATION; INTERVIEWS; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-023-01530-3
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Focus groups are an increasingly popular method for eliciting non-material values and cultural ecosystem services (CES) in the context of studying human-nature relationships. We conducted a systematic review of the literature with the aim of exploring where and how focus groups were used in the research into CES. Furthermore, we aimed to highlight good practices and potential caveats of the use of the focus groups method with respect to recommendations in methodological literature. We employed an inclusive CES classification framework and observed that focus groups were mostly used to research Recreation, Aesthetics, and Education categories. The review also discovered insufficient reporting and methodological inconsistencies in some of the studies. We provide suggestions for more robust and trustworthy applications of the focus group method, which can advance both research in this field and the implementation of the ecosystem services concept in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research: a systematic review
    Ľuboš Slovák
    Jan Daněk
    Tomáš Daněk
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10
  • [2] Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review of Provisioning and Cultural Ecosystem Services in Estuaries
    Booi, Sipesihle
    Mishi, Syden
    Andersen, Oddgeir
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [3] CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND VALUATION METHODS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Marquez, Laura Andreina Matos
    Castro, Joana D'Arc Bardella
    Martins, Emilly Layne
    ANUARIO TURISMO Y SOCIEDAD, 2024, 34 : 111 - 126
  • [4] A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing
    Kosanic, Aleksandra
    Petzold, Jan
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 45
  • [5] Cultural ecosystem services in European grasslands: A systematic review of threats
    Raoul Pellaton
    Eszter Lellei-Kovács
    András Báldi
    Ambio, 2022, 51 : 2462 - 2477
  • [6] Cultural ecosystem services in European grasslands: A systematic review of threats
    Pellaton, Raoul
    Lellei-Kovacs, Eszter
    Baldi, Andras
    AMBIO, 2022, 51 (12) : 2462 - 2477
  • [7] A global systematic review of the cultural ecosystem services provided by wetlands
    Wood, Kevin A.
    Jupe, Lucy L.
    Aguiar, Francisca C.
    Collins, Alexandra M.
    Davidson, Scott J.
    Freeman, Will
    Kirkpatrick, Liam
    Lobato-de Magalhaes, Tatiana
    Mckinley, Emma
    Nuno, Ana
    Pages, Jordi F.
    Petruzzella, Antonella
    Pritchard, Dave
    Reeves, Jonathan P.
    Thomaz, Sidinei Magela
    Thornton, Sara A.
    Yamashita, Hiromi
    Newth, Julia L.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 70
  • [8] A systematic quantitative review of coastal and marine cultural ecosystem services: Current status and future research
    Martin, Carol L.
    Momtaz, Salim
    Gaston, Troy
    Moltschaniwskyj, Natalie A.
    MARINE POLICY, 2016, 74 : 25 - 32
  • [9] Cultural Ecosystem Services Research Progress and Future Prospects: A Review
    Yang, Liangjian
    Cao, Kaijun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [10] Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research
    Milcu, Andra Ioana
    Hanspach, Jan
    Abson, David
    Fischer, Joern
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (03):