The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research: a systematic review

被引:4
|
作者
Slovak, Lubos [1 ,2 ]
Danek, Jan [1 ,3 ]
Danek, Tomas [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Czech Acad Sci, Global Change Res Inst, Brno, Czech Republic
[2] Masaryk Univ, Fac Social Studies, Dept Environm Studies, Brno, Czech Republic
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Humanities, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Palacky Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Dev & Environm Studies, Olomouc, Czech Republic
来源
关键词
NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS; VALUES; CLASSIFICATION; CONSERVATION; INTERVIEWS; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-023-01530-3
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Focus groups are an increasingly popular method for eliciting non-material values and cultural ecosystem services (CES) in the context of studying human-nature relationships. We conducted a systematic review of the literature with the aim of exploring where and how focus groups were used in the research into CES. Furthermore, we aimed to highlight good practices and potential caveats of the use of the focus groups method with respect to recommendations in methodological literature. We employed an inclusive CES classification framework and observed that focus groups were mostly used to research Recreation, Aesthetics, and Education categories. The review also discovered insufficient reporting and methodological inconsistencies in some of the studies. We provide suggestions for more robust and trustworthy applications of the focus group method, which can advance both research in this field and the implementation of the ecosystem services concept in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Wetland ecosystem services research: A critical review
    Xu, Xibao
    Chen, Minkun
    Yang, Guishan
    Jiang, Bo
    Zhang, Ji
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 22
  • [42] IMPROVING BUSINESS SERVICES THROUGH THE USE OF FOCUS GROUPS
    BAKER, SL
    RQ, 1991, 30 (03): : 377 - 385
  • [43] A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services of blue carbon ecosystems: Trends, gaps, and challenges in Asia and beyond
    Quevedo, Jay Mar D.
    Kohsaka, Ryo
    MARINE POLICY, 2024, 159
  • [44] A systematic review on the ecosystem services provided by green infrastructure
    Jato-Espino, Daniel
    Capra-Ribeiro, Fabio
    Moscardo, Vanessa
    Mayor-Vitoria, Fernando
    Gallardo, Laura O.
    Carracedo, Patricia
    Dietrich, Kristin
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2023, 86
  • [45] Systematic review of soil ecosystem services in tropical regions
    Rodrigues, Aline F.
    Latawiec, Agnieszka E.
    Reid, Brian J.
    Solorzano, Alexandro
    Schuler, Azeneth E.
    Lacerda, Carine
    Fidalgo, Elaine C. C.
    Scarano, Fabio R.
    Tubenchlak, Fernanda
    Pena, Ingrid
    Vicente-Vicente, Jose Luis
    Korys, Katarzyna A.
    Cooper, Miguel
    Fernandes, Nelson F.
    Prado, Rachel B.
    Maioli, Veronica
    Dib, Viviane
    Teixeira, Wenceslau G.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 8 (03):
  • [46] Urban Ecosystem Services in South America: A Systematic Review
    Munoz-Pacheco, Catalina B.
    Villasenor, Nelida R.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (17)
  • [47] Ecosystem services provided by bromeliad plants: A systematic review
    Ladino, Geraldine
    Ospina-Bautista, Fabiola
    Varon, Jaime Estevez
    Jerabkova, Lucie
    Kratina, Pavel
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (12): : 7360 - 7372
  • [48] Cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods and tools for economic evaluation
    Romanazzi, Giuliano Rocco
    Koto, Romina
    De Boni, Annalisa
    Palmisano, Giovanni Ottomano
    Cioffi, Marilisa
    Roma, Rocco
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2023, 20
  • [49] Diverging perceptions by social groups on cultural ecosystem services provided by urban green
    Riechers, Maraja
    Barkmann, Jan
    Tscharntke, Teja
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2018, 175 : 161 - 168
  • [50] Valuing Cultural Ecosystem Services
    Hirons, Mark
    Comberti, Claudia
    Dunford, Robert
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 41, 2016, 41 : 545 - 574