Commissioning a secondary dose calculation software for a 0.35 T MR-linac

被引:5
|
作者
Price, Alex T. [1 ]
Knutson, Nels C. [1 ]
Kim, Taeho [1 ]
Green, Olga L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Campus Box 8224,4921 Parkview Pl, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
关键词
MRgRT; MRI-guided radiation therapy; quality assurance; secondary dose calculations; THERAPY PHYSICS COMMITTEE; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MEGAVOLTAGE PHOTON; RADIOTHERAPY; ACCELERATOR; AIR; MALIGNANCIES; PERFORMANCE; DOSIMETRY; SCANNER;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13452
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Secondary external dose calculations for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) are needed within the radiation oncology community to follow safety standards set forth within the field. We evaluate the commercially available software, RadCalc, in its ability to accurately perform monitor unit dose calculations within a magnetic field. We also evaluate the potential effects of a 0.35 T magnetic field upon point dose calculations. Monitor unit calculations were evaluated with (wMag) and without (noMag) a magnetic field considerations in RadCalc for the ViewRay MRIdian. The magnetic field is indirectly accounted for by using asymmetric profiles for calculation. The introduction of double-stacked multi-leaf collimator leaves was also included in the monitor unit calculations and a single transmission value was determined. A suite of simple and complex geometries with a variety field arrangements were calculated for each method to demonstrate the effect of the 0.35 T magnetic field on monitor unit calculations. Finally, 25 patient-specific treatment plans were calculated using each method for comparison. All simple geometries calculated in RadCalc were within 2% of treatment planning system (TPS) values for both methods, except for a single noMag off-axis comparison. All complex muilt-leaf collimator (MLC) pattern calculations were within 5%. All complex phantom geometry calculations were within 5% except for a single field within a lung phantom at a distal point. For the patient calculations, the noMag method average percentage difference was 0.09 +/- 2.5% and the wMag average percentage difference was 0.08 +/- 2.5%. All results were within 5% for the wMag method. We performed monitor unit calculations for a 0.35 T MRgRT system using a commercially available secondary monitor unit dose calculation software and demonstrated minimal impact of the 0.35 T magnetic field on monitor unit dose calculations. This is the first investigation demonstrating successful calculations of dose using RadCalc in the low-field 0.35 T ViewRay MRIdian system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Secondary 3D Dose Verification for Online Adaptive Radiotherapy with MR-Linac
    Chen, G.
    Zhang, J.
    Li, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E145 - E145
  • [42] The Quality Assurance of a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Riis, Hans Lynggaard
    Chick, Joan
    Dunlop, Alex
    Tilly, David
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 120 - 128
  • [43] Absolute dosimetry at a 0.35T MR-Linac with a combined polymer gel (PG)-TLD system
    Schwahofer, A.
    Mann, P.
    Spindeldreier, K.
    Karger, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S704 - S705
  • [44] Identifying Robust Radiomic Features Extracted From Images Generated by 0.35T MR-Linac
    Ericsson-szecsenyi, R.
    Zhang, G.
    Redler, G.
    Latifi, K.
    Feygelman, V.
    Tomaszewski, M.
    Moros, E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E624 - E624
  • [45] Comparison of Skin Dose for Brain Cancer Patients Between a 1.5 T MR-Linac and a Conventional Linac
    Kim, A.
    McCann, C.
    Ruschin, M. E.
    Tseng, C. L.
    Sahgal, A.
    Keller, B. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E279 - E279
  • [46] Evaluation and correction of geometric accuracy in diffusion-weighted imaging on a 0.35T MR-LINAC
    Pouymayou, B.
    Wallimann, P.
    Piccirelli, M.
    Nowakowska, S.
    Mayinger, M.
    Guckenberger, M.
    Tanadini-Lang, S.
    Boss, A.
    Andratschke, N.
    Bink, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S162 - S164
  • [47] Automatic Multiorgan Segmentation in Pelvic Region with Convolutional Neural Networks on 0.35 T MR-Linac Images
    Koutoulakis, Emmanouil
    Marage, Louis
    Markodimitrakis, Emmanouil
    Aubignac, Leone
    Jenny, Catherine
    Bessieres, Igor
    Lalande, Alain
    Werner, Frank
    ALGORITHMS, 2023, 16 (11)
  • [48] Comparison of AI-based autosegmentation techniques exploiting prior knowledge at a 0.35 T MR-Linac
    Kawula, M.
    Hadi, I.
    Nierer, L.
    Vagni, M.
    Cusumano, D.
    Boldrini, L.
    Placidi, L.
    Corradini, S.
    Belka, C.
    Landry, G.
    Kurz, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S672 - S673
  • [49] MV-based relative electron density estimation (iMREDe) for MR-LINAC dose calculation
    Myronakis, Marios
    Hu, Yue-Houng
    Jacobson, Matthew William
    Williams, Christopher Leigh
    Berbeco, Ross Isaac
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (03) : 2155 - 2163
  • [50] Efficient Acquisition of MR-Linac Commissioning Data Using Cherenkov Projection Imaging
    Alexander, D.
    Zhang, R.
    Bruza, P.
    Pogue, B.
    Gladstone, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E609 - E610