Commissioning a secondary dose calculation software for a 0.35 T MR-linac

被引:5
|
作者
Price, Alex T. [1 ]
Knutson, Nels C. [1 ]
Kim, Taeho [1 ]
Green, Olga L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Campus Box 8224,4921 Parkview Pl, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
关键词
MRgRT; MRI-guided radiation therapy; quality assurance; secondary dose calculations; THERAPY PHYSICS COMMITTEE; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MEGAVOLTAGE PHOTON; RADIOTHERAPY; ACCELERATOR; AIR; MALIGNANCIES; PERFORMANCE; DOSIMETRY; SCANNER;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13452
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Secondary external dose calculations for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) are needed within the radiation oncology community to follow safety standards set forth within the field. We evaluate the commercially available software, RadCalc, in its ability to accurately perform monitor unit dose calculations within a magnetic field. We also evaluate the potential effects of a 0.35 T magnetic field upon point dose calculations. Monitor unit calculations were evaluated with (wMag) and without (noMag) a magnetic field considerations in RadCalc for the ViewRay MRIdian. The magnetic field is indirectly accounted for by using asymmetric profiles for calculation. The introduction of double-stacked multi-leaf collimator leaves was also included in the monitor unit calculations and a single transmission value was determined. A suite of simple and complex geometries with a variety field arrangements were calculated for each method to demonstrate the effect of the 0.35 T magnetic field on monitor unit calculations. Finally, 25 patient-specific treatment plans were calculated using each method for comparison. All simple geometries calculated in RadCalc were within 2% of treatment planning system (TPS) values for both methods, except for a single noMag off-axis comparison. All complex muilt-leaf collimator (MLC) pattern calculations were within 5%. All complex phantom geometry calculations were within 5% except for a single field within a lung phantom at a distal point. For the patient calculations, the noMag method average percentage difference was 0.09 +/- 2.5% and the wMag average percentage difference was 0.08 +/- 2.5%. All results were within 5% for the wMag method. We performed monitor unit calculations for a 0.35 T MRgRT system using a commercially available secondary monitor unit dose calculation software and demonstrated minimal impact of the 0.35 T magnetic field on monitor unit dose calculations. This is the first investigation demonstrating successful calculations of dose using RadCalc in the low-field 0.35 T ViewRay MRIdian system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 2D and 3D dose verification for a gated irradiation on a 0.35 T MR-LINAC
    Mann, P.
    Spindeldreier, K.
    Echner, G.
    Klueter, S.
    Karger, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S1075 - S1075
  • [22] Commissioning Report of a High Field MR-Linac System
    Tyagi, N.
    Subashi, E.
    Scripes, P. Godoy
    Mechalakos, J.
    Souto, X. Gonzalez
    Lim, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E723 - E723
  • [23] Deep learning application for abdominal organs segmentation on 0.35 T MR-Linac images
    Zhou, You
    Lalande, Alain
    Chevalier, Cedric
    Baude, Jeremy
    Aubignac, Leone
    Boudet, Julien
    Bessieres, Igor
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 13
  • [24] Polymer gel-based tests for geometric accuracy in a 0.35 T MR-LINAC
    Dorsch, S.
    Mann, P.
    Elter, A.
    Runz, A.
    Klueter, S.
    Karger, C. P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S919 - S919
  • [25] Measurement of isocenter alignment accuracy and image distortion of an 0.35 T MR-Linac system
    Dorsch, S.
    Mann, P.
    Elter, A.
    Runz, A.
    Spindeldreier, C. K.
    Klueter, S.
    Karger, C. P.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (20):
  • [26] Feasibility study: Polymer Gel Dosimetry On 0.35T MR-Linac System
    Marage, L.
    Boudet, J.
    Aubignac, L.
    Bessieres, I.
    Petitfils, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E769 - E769
  • [27] Commissioning of a 1.5T Elekta Unity MR-linac: A single institution experience
    Snyder, Jeffrey E.
    St-Aubin, Joel
    Yaddanapudi, Sridhar
    Boczkowski, Amanda
    Dunkerley, David A. P.
    Graves, Stephen A.
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (07): : 160 - 172
  • [28] An Open Source Motorized Water Phantom for MR-Linac Commissioning
    Guthier, C. V.
    Huynh, E.
    Williams, C. L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E698 - E699
  • [29] Rapid Commissioning of An MR-Linac with Hydrostatic and Cherenkov Imaging Techniques
    Zhang, R.
    Alexander, D.
    Williams, B.
    Gates, L.
    Rafie, F.
    Nelson, N.
    Bruza, P.
    Pogue, B.
    Zaki, B.
    Gladstone, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E436 - E436
  • [30] Elekta Unity MR-linac commissioning: mechanical and dosimetry tests
    Tsuneda, Masato
    Abe, Kota
    Fujita, Yukio
    Ikeda, Yohei
    Furuyama, Yoshinobu
    Uno, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2023, 64 (01) : 73 - 84