Commissioning a secondary dose calculation software for a 0.35 T MR-linac

被引:5
|
作者
Price, Alex T. [1 ]
Knutson, Nels C. [1 ]
Kim, Taeho [1 ]
Green, Olga L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Campus Box 8224,4921 Parkview Pl, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
关键词
MRgRT; MRI-guided radiation therapy; quality assurance; secondary dose calculations; THERAPY PHYSICS COMMITTEE; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MEGAVOLTAGE PHOTON; RADIOTHERAPY; ACCELERATOR; AIR; MALIGNANCIES; PERFORMANCE; DOSIMETRY; SCANNER;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13452
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Secondary external dose calculations for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) are needed within the radiation oncology community to follow safety standards set forth within the field. We evaluate the commercially available software, RadCalc, in its ability to accurately perform monitor unit dose calculations within a magnetic field. We also evaluate the potential effects of a 0.35 T magnetic field upon point dose calculations. Monitor unit calculations were evaluated with (wMag) and without (noMag) a magnetic field considerations in RadCalc for the ViewRay MRIdian. The magnetic field is indirectly accounted for by using asymmetric profiles for calculation. The introduction of double-stacked multi-leaf collimator leaves was also included in the monitor unit calculations and a single transmission value was determined. A suite of simple and complex geometries with a variety field arrangements were calculated for each method to demonstrate the effect of the 0.35 T magnetic field on monitor unit calculations. Finally, 25 patient-specific treatment plans were calculated using each method for comparison. All simple geometries calculated in RadCalc were within 2% of treatment planning system (TPS) values for both methods, except for a single noMag off-axis comparison. All complex muilt-leaf collimator (MLC) pattern calculations were within 5%. All complex phantom geometry calculations were within 5% except for a single field within a lung phantom at a distal point. For the patient calculations, the noMag method average percentage difference was 0.09 +/- 2.5% and the wMag average percentage difference was 0.08 +/- 2.5%. All results were within 5% for the wMag method. We performed monitor unit calculations for a 0.35 T MRgRT system using a commercially available secondary monitor unit dose calculation software and demonstrated minimal impact of the 0.35 T magnetic field on monitor unit dose calculations. This is the first investigation demonstrating successful calculations of dose using RadCalc in the low-field 0.35 T ViewRay MRIdian system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Optimization of treatment workflow for 0.35T MR-Linac system
    Behzadipour, Mojtaba
    Palta, Jatinder
    Ma, Tianjun
    Yuan, Lulin
    Kim, Siyong
    Kirby, Suzanne
    Torkelson, Laurel
    Baker, James
    Koenig, Tammy
    Khalifa, Mateb Al
    Hawranko, Robert
    Richeson, Dylan
    Fields, Emma
    Weiss, Elisabeth
    Song, William Y.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (08):
  • [12] Dosimetry with the TruView gel on a 0.35 T MR-Linac: A feasibility study
    Ermeneux, L.
    Petitfils, A.
    Marage, L.
    Gschwind, R.
    Huet, C.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2024, 175
  • [13] Rapid multicontrast brain imaging on a 0.35T MR-linac
    Nejad-Davarani, Siamak P.
    Zakariaei, Niloufar
    Chen, Yongsheng
    Haacke, E. Mark
    Hurst, Newton J., Jr.
    Salim Siddiqui, M.
    Schultz, Lonni R.
    Snyder, James M.
    Walbert, Tobias
    Glide-Hurst, Carri K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (09) : 4064 - 4076
  • [14] Commissioning measurements on an Elekta Unity MR-Linac
    Marcus Powers
    John Baines
    Robert Crane
    Chantelle Fisher
    Stephen Gibson
    Linda Marsh
    Bronwyn Oar
    Ariadne Shoobridge
    Emily Simpson-Page
    Marchant Van der Walt
    Glenn de Vine
    Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2022, 45 : 457 - 473
  • [15] Commissioning measurements on an Elekta Unity MR-Linac
    Powers, Marcus
    Baines, John
    Crane, Robert
    Fisher, Chantelle
    Gibson, Stephen
    Marsh, Linda
    Oar, Bronwyn
    Shoobridge, Ariadne
    Simpson-Page, Emily
    Van der Walt, Marchant
    de Vine, Glenn
    PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2022, 45 (02) : 457 - 473
  • [16] Development of a Secondary MU Calculation Tool for An Integrated MR-LINAC
    Chen, G.
    Li, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 395 - 395
  • [17] Phantom measurements of apparent diffusion coefficient on a 0.35T MR-Linac
    Wallimann, P.
    Pouymayou, B.
    Mayinger, M.
    Nowakowska, S.
    Boss, A.
    Guckenberger, M.
    Tanadini-Lang, S.
    Andratschke, N.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S560 - S562
  • [18] Ventilation and perfusion MRI at a 0.35 T MR-Linac: feasibility and reproducibility study
    Klaar, Rabea
    Rabe, Moritz
    Gaass, Thomas
    Schneider, Moritz J.
    Benlala, Ilyes
    Eze, Chukwuka
    Corradini, Stefanie
    Belka, Claus
    Landry, Guillaume
    Kurz, Christopher
    Dinkel, Julien
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [19] A multi-institutional comparison of dosimetric data for a 0.35 T MR-linac
    Khan, Ahtesham Ullah
    Lotey, Rajiv
    DeWerd, Larry A.
    Yadav, Poonam
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (05):
  • [20] Ventilation and perfusion MRI at a 0.35 T MR-Linac: feasibility and reproducibility study
    Rabea Klaar
    Moritz Rabe
    Thomas Gaass
    Moritz J. Schneider
    Ilyes Benlala
    Chukwuka Eze
    Stefanie Corradini
    Claus Belka
    Guillaume Landry
    Christopher Kurz
    Julien Dinkel
    Radiation Oncology, 18