Commissioning a secondary dose calculation software for a 0.35 T MR-linac

被引:5
|
作者
Price, Alex T. [1 ]
Knutson, Nels C. [1 ]
Kim, Taeho [1 ]
Green, Olga L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Campus Box 8224,4921 Parkview Pl, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
关键词
MRgRT; MRI-guided radiation therapy; quality assurance; secondary dose calculations; THERAPY PHYSICS COMMITTEE; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MEGAVOLTAGE PHOTON; RADIOTHERAPY; ACCELERATOR; AIR; MALIGNANCIES; PERFORMANCE; DOSIMETRY; SCANNER;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13452
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Secondary external dose calculations for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) are needed within the radiation oncology community to follow safety standards set forth within the field. We evaluate the commercially available software, RadCalc, in its ability to accurately perform monitor unit dose calculations within a magnetic field. We also evaluate the potential effects of a 0.35 T magnetic field upon point dose calculations. Monitor unit calculations were evaluated with (wMag) and without (noMag) a magnetic field considerations in RadCalc for the ViewRay MRIdian. The magnetic field is indirectly accounted for by using asymmetric profiles for calculation. The introduction of double-stacked multi-leaf collimator leaves was also included in the monitor unit calculations and a single transmission value was determined. A suite of simple and complex geometries with a variety field arrangements were calculated for each method to demonstrate the effect of the 0.35 T magnetic field on monitor unit calculations. Finally, 25 patient-specific treatment plans were calculated using each method for comparison. All simple geometries calculated in RadCalc were within 2% of treatment planning system (TPS) values for both methods, except for a single noMag off-axis comparison. All complex muilt-leaf collimator (MLC) pattern calculations were within 5%. All complex phantom geometry calculations were within 5% except for a single field within a lung phantom at a distal point. For the patient calculations, the noMag method average percentage difference was 0.09 +/- 2.5% and the wMag average percentage difference was 0.08 +/- 2.5%. All results were within 5% for the wMag method. We performed monitor unit calculations for a 0.35 T MRgRT system using a commercially available secondary monitor unit dose calculation software and demonstrated minimal impact of the 0.35 T magnetic field on monitor unit dose calculations. This is the first investigation demonstrating successful calculations of dose using RadCalc in the low-field 0.35 T ViewRay MRIdian system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Electron streaming dose measurements and calculations on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Patterson, Elizabeth
    Powers, Marcus
    Metcalfe, Peter E.
    Cutajar, Dean
    Oborn, Bradley M.
    Baines, John A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (07):
  • [32] Comprehensive commissioning of MR-Linac online adaptive radiotherapy QA
    Green, O.
    Price, A.
    Cai, B.
    Cammin, J.
    Rodriguez, V.
    Park, J.
    Mutic, S.
    Yang, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S38 - S38
  • [33] An Independent Dose Calculation Method for MR-Guided Radiotherapy with Elekta Unity MR-Linac
    Chen, X.
    Hwang, M.
    Oh, S.
    Sohn, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E208 - E208
  • [34] Role of MR- Scanning Water Tank in Commissioning of MR-Linac Unit
    Yadav, P.
    Das, I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E935 - E935
  • [35] Prospective Evaluation of Serial Quantitative MR Imaging of Patients with Brain Cancer On a 0.35T MR-Linac
    Nejad-Davarani, S.
    Zakariaei, N.
    Hurst, N.
    Siddiqui, S.
    Snyder, J.
    Walbert, T.
    Chen, Y.
    Haacke, E.
    Glide-Hurst, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E649 - E649
  • [36] LSTM networks for real-time respiratory motion prediction for a 0.35 T MR-linac
    Lombardo, E.
    Xiong, Y.
    Rabe, M.
    Nierer, L.
    Cusumano, D.
    Placidi, L.
    Boldrini, L.
    Corradini, S.
    Belka, C.
    Riboldi, M.
    Kurz, C.
    Landry, G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S18 - S19
  • [37] MRI commissioning of 1.5T MR-linac systems - a multi-institutional study
    Tijssen, Rob H. N.
    Philippens, Marielle E. P.
    Paulson, Eric S.
    Glitzner, Markus
    Chugh, Brige
    Wetscherek, Andreas
    Dubec, Michael
    Wang, Jihong
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 132 : 114 - 120
  • [38] Comprehensive MRI Acceptance Testing & Commissioning of a 1.5T MR-Linac: Guidelines and Results
    Tijssen, R. H. N.
    Crijns, S. P. M.
    Bluemink, J. J.
    Hacket, S. S.
    DeVries, J. H. W.
    Kruiskamp, M. J.
    Philippens, M. E. P.
    Lagendijk, J. J. W.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S130 - S131
  • [39] Commissioning of MRI-guided gynaecological brachytherapy using an MR-linac
    Rojas-Lopez, Jose Alejandro
    Cabrera-Santiago, Alexis
    Adragna, Celeste
    Ibarra-Ortega, Brenda Elisabeth
    Lopez-Luna, Jose Eleazar
    Contreras-Rodriguez, Jonathan Agustin
    Martinez-Ortiz, Efrain
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2024, 10 (05):
  • [40] Commissioning and Validation of Patient-Specific Quality Assurance On An MR-Linac
    Du, D.
    Kim, J.
    Glide-Hurst, C.
    Doemer, A.
    Wen, N.
    Movsas, B.
    Dragovic, J.
    Chetty, I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E143 - E143