Identifying Spatial Terminology and Boundaries for Human Robot Interaction: A Human Study

被引:0
|
作者
Srimal, P. H. D. Arjuna S. [1 ]
Muthugala, M. A. Viraj J. [1 ]
Jayasekara, A. G. Buddhika P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Moratuwa, Dept Elect Engn, Robot & Control Lab, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka
来源
2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL MORATUWA ENGINEERING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (MERCON) | 2017年
关键词
Identifying spatial terminology; human study; human-robot interaction; NATURAL-LANGUAGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Service robots have been widely adopted to the domestic environment over the past few years. Pertaining to this sudden growth, a high interest has been exerted upon the service robots deployed in the domestic circle. The domestic users are not overly cohabitated with technology and use natural language habitually in their daily tasks. Instead of a set of machine specific instructions, natural language contains spatial terms with ambiguous meaning which gets altered depending on the environment and users themselves. Therefore the competence of the robot to understand and interpret the natural language instructions used by humans becomes a fact of substantial importance in the domestic environment. This paper contributes in a human study which helps in understanding three of the main aspects that alter the meaning of these spatial terms namely; the effect of size of the surface, the effect of user's position and the effect of the restricted reachability due to objects in the surrounding area. Furthermore this study helps to understand the references used by humans when issuing commands and also builds up a corpus of natural spatial terms frequently used in object manipulation. After statistically analysing the results, the study reveals the extent to which the object placement task is affected by the above mentioned three aspects.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 51
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Study on Social Exclusion in Human-Robot Interaction
    Spisak, Sharon Ewa
    Indurkhya, Bipin
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (07)
  • [22] Deictic human/robot interaction
    Pook, PK
    Ballard, DH
    ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 1996, 18 (1-2) : 259 - 269
  • [23] Interfaces for human and robot interaction
    Bejczy, AK
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED ROBOTICS 2003, VOL 1-3, 2003, : 1568 - 1575
  • [24] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sidobre, Daniel
    Broquere, Xavier
    Mainprice, Jim
    Burattini, Ernesto
    Finzi, Alberto
    Rossi, Silvia
    Staffa, Mariacarla
    ADVANCED BIMANUAL MANIPULATION: RESULTS FROM THE DEXMART PROJECT, 2012, 80 : 123 - +
  • [25] Human-robot interaction
    Kosuge, K
    Hirata, Y
    IEEE ROBIO 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND BIOMIMETICS, 2004, : 8 - 11
  • [26] Human-robot interaction
    Sidobre, Daniel
    Broquère, Xavier
    Mainprice, Jim
    Burattini, Ernesto
    Finzi, Alberto
    Rossi, Silvia
    Staffa, Mariacarla
    Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, 2012, 80 (STAR): : 123 - 172
  • [27] Bodily Human Robot Interaction
    Solis, Jorge
    Sorensen, Anders Stengaard
    Rasmussen, Gitte
    HRI '19: 2019 14TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2019, : 683 - 684
  • [28] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sethumadhavan, Arathi
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2012, 20 (03) : 27 - +
  • [29] Human-robot interaction
    Murphy R.R.
    Nomura T.
    Billard A.
    Burke J.L.
    IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2010, 17 (02): : 85 - 89
  • [30] Robot-Human Interaction
    St-Onge, David
    Reeves, Nicolas
    Petkova, Nataliya
    COMPANION OF THE 2017 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI'17), 2017, : 30 - 38