Identifying Spatial Terminology and Boundaries for Human Robot Interaction: A Human Study

被引:0
|
作者
Srimal, P. H. D. Arjuna S. [1 ]
Muthugala, M. A. Viraj J. [1 ]
Jayasekara, A. G. Buddhika P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Moratuwa, Dept Elect Engn, Robot & Control Lab, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka
来源
2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL MORATUWA ENGINEERING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (MERCON) | 2017年
关键词
Identifying spatial terminology; human study; human-robot interaction; NATURAL-LANGUAGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Service robots have been widely adopted to the domestic environment over the past few years. Pertaining to this sudden growth, a high interest has been exerted upon the service robots deployed in the domestic circle. The domestic users are not overly cohabitated with technology and use natural language habitually in their daily tasks. Instead of a set of machine specific instructions, natural language contains spatial terms with ambiguous meaning which gets altered depending on the environment and users themselves. Therefore the competence of the robot to understand and interpret the natural language instructions used by humans becomes a fact of substantial importance in the domestic environment. This paper contributes in a human study which helps in understanding three of the main aspects that alter the meaning of these spatial terms namely; the effect of size of the surface, the effect of user's position and the effect of the restricted reachability due to objects in the surrounding area. Furthermore this study helps to understand the references used by humans when issuing commands and also builds up a corpus of natural spatial terms frequently used in object manipulation. After statistically analysing the results, the study reveals the extent to which the object placement task is affected by the above mentioned three aspects.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 51
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Human-Robot Interaction
    Ivaldi, Serena
    Pateraki, Maria
    ERCIM NEWS, 2018, (114): : 6 - 7
  • [32] Timing in Human Robot Interaction
    Hoffman, Guy
    Cakmak, Maya
    Chao, Crystal
    HRI'14: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2014, : 509 - 510
  • [33] Human-Robot Interaction
    Jia, Yunyi
    Zhang, Biao
    Li, Miao
    King, Brady
    Meghdari, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS, 2018, 2018
  • [34] A Robot that Perceives Human Emotions and Implications in human-robot interaction
    Kirandziska, Vesna
    Ackovska, Nevena
    2014 23RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (IEEE RO-MAN), 2014, : 495 - 498
  • [35] Comparison of various models of robot and human in human-robot interaction
    Luh, JYS
    Hu, SY
    1998 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, 1998, : 1139 - 1144
  • [36] Human-robot interaction and robot control
    Sequeira, Joao
    Ribeiro, Maria Isabel
    ROBOT MOTION AND CONTROL: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS, 2006, 335 : 375 - 390
  • [37] The development of humanoid robot for human robot interaction
    Kim, Chang Gu
    Choi, Mun-Taek
    Noh, Hak Jong
    Kim, Jonghoon
    Lee, Sangyong
    Cho, Changhyun
    Kim, Munsang
    2007 RO-MAN: 16TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 624 - 629
  • [38] Human robot interaction in mobile robot applications
    Ohya, A
    IEEE ROMAN 2002, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 5 - 10
  • [39] The Effect of Multiple Robot Interaction on Human-Robot Interaction
    Yang, Jeong-Yean
    Kwon, Dong-Soo
    2012 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UBIQUITOUS ROBOTS AND AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE (URAL), 2012, : 30 - 33
  • [40] Invoking and identifying task-oriented interlocutor confusion in human-robot interaction
    Li, Na
    Ross, Robert
    FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI, 2023, 10