Performance Evaluation of the FLEX Triumph X-PET Scanner Using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU-4 Standards

被引:0
|
作者
Prasad, Rameshwar [1 ]
Ratib, Osman [1 ]
Zaidi, Habib [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Nucl Med, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Geneva Neurosci Ctr, Geneva, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
PET; preclinical imaging; performance evaluation; NEMA; rodents; SMALL-ANIMAL PET; IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION; RESOLUTION; MICROPET; DESIGN; SENSITIVITY; DETECTOR; CAMERA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this work was to evaluate the performance characteristics of the preclinical X-PET subsystem of the FLEX Triumph PET/CT scanner based on the NU 4-2008 standards of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Methods: The performance parameters evaluated include the spatial resolution, scatter fraction, count losses and random coincidences, sensitivity, and image-quality characteristics. The PET detector array consisted of 11,520 individual bismuth germanate crystals arranged in 48 rings and 180 blocks, with an axial field of view (FOV) of 11.6 cm and a inner ring diameter of 16.5 cm. The spatial resolution was measured with a small Na-22 point source (diameter, 0.25 mm) at different radial offsets from the center. Sensitivity was calculated using the same source by stepping the source axially through the axial FOV of the scanner. Scatter fraction and counting-rate performances were determined using a mouse-and rat-sized phantom with an F-18 line source insert. The NEMA image-quality phantom and rodent imaging were also performed to access the overall imaging capabilities of the scanner. Results: Tangential spatial resolution in terms of full width at half maximum varied between 2.2 mm at the center of the FOV and 2.3 mm at a radial offset of 2.5 cm. The radial spatial resolution varied between 2.0 at the center and 4.4 mm at a radial offset of 2.3 cm. The peak system absolute sensitivity was 5.9% at the center of the FOV. The absolute system sensitivity was 0.67 counts/s/Bq, and the relative total system sensitivity was 73.9%. The scatter fraction for the mouse-sized phantom was 7.9%, with a peak true counting rate of 168 kilocounts per second (kcps) at 0.3 MBq/mL and a peak noise-equivalent counting rate of 106 kcps at 0.17 MBq/ mL. The rat-sized phantom had a scatter fraction of 21%, with a peak true counting rate of 93 kcps at 0.034 MBq/mL and a peak noise-equivalent counting rate of 49 kcps at 0.02 MBq/mL. Recovery coefficients for the image-quality phantom ranged from 0.13 to 0.88. Conclusion: The performance of the X-PET scanner based on the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards was fully characterized. The overall performance demonstrates that the X-PET system is suitable for preclinical research.
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1615
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU-4 Performance Evaluation of the PET Component of the NanoPET/CT Preclinical PET/CT Scanner
    Szanda, Istvan
    Mackewn, Jane
    Patay, Gergely
    Major, Peter
    Sunassee, Kavitha
    Mullen, Gregory E.
    Nemeth, Gabor
    Haemisch, York
    Blower, Philip J.
    Marsden, Paul K.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52 (11) : 1741 - 1747
  • [2] Performance evaluation of the Inveon PET Scanner using GATE based on the NEMA NU-4 Standards
    Lu, Lijun
    Karakatsanis, Nicolas
    Ma, Jianhua
    Bian, Zhaoying
    Han, Yanjiang
    Tang, Jing
    Rahmim, Arman
    Chen, Wufan
    2013 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2013,
  • [3] Accurate Monte Carlo modeling and performance assessment of the X-PET™ subsystem of the FLEX Triumph™ preclinical PET/CT scanner
    Zeraatkar, N.
    Ay, M. R.
    Kamali-Asl, A. R.
    Zaidi, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (03) : 1217 - 1225
  • [4] NEMA NU-4 Performance Evaluation of the IRIS PET/CT Preclinical Scanner
    Belcari N.
    Camarlinghi N.
    Ferretti S.
    Iozzo P.
    Panetta D.
    Salvadori P.A.
    Sportelli G.
    Del Guerra A.
    IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, 2017, 1 (04): : 301 - 309
  • [5] PET performance measurements for an LSO-based combined PET/CT scanner using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard
    Erdi, YE
    Nehmeh, SA
    Mulnix, T
    Humm, JL
    Watson, CC
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2004, 45 (05) : 813 - 821
  • [6] National Electrical Manufacturers Association and Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Brain PET/CT Scanner
    Grogg, Kira S.
    Toole, Terrence
    Ouyang, Jinsong
    Zhu, Xuping
    Normandin, Marc D.
    Li, Quanzheng
    Johnson, Keith
    Alpert, Nathaniel M.
    El Fakhri, Georges
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 (04) : 646 - 652
  • [7] Performance Evaluation of the Inveon Dedicated PET Preclinical Tomograph Based on the NEMA NU-4 Standards
    Bao, Qinan
    Newport, Danny
    Chen, Mu
    Stout, David B.
    Chatziioannou, Arion F.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 (03) : 401 - 408
  • [8] Performance Evaluation of a PEM Scanner Using the NEMA NU 4-2008 Small Animal PET Standards
    Luo, Weidong
    Anashkin, Edward
    Matthews, Christopher G.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2010, 57 (01) : 94 - 103
  • [9] Performance Evaluation of a New Dedicated Breast PET Scanner Using NEMA NU4-2008 Standards
    Miyake, Kanae K.
    Matsumoto, Keiichi
    Inoue, Mika
    Nakamoto, Yuji
    Kanao, Shotaro
    Oishi, Tae
    Kawase, Shigeto
    Kitamura, Keishi
    Yamakawa, Yoshiyuki
    Akazawa, Ayako
    Kobayashi, Tetsuya
    Ohi, Junichi
    Togashi, Kaori
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55 (07) : 1198 - 1203
  • [10] NEMA NU-4 2008 performance evaluation of Xtrim-PET: A prototype SiPM-based preclinical scanner
    Amirrashedi, Mahsa
    Sarkar, Saeed
    Ghafarian, Pardis
    Shahraki, Reza Hashemi
    Geramifar, Parham
    Zaidi, Habib
    Ay, Mohammad Reza
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (11) : 4816 - 4825