Performance Evaluation of the FLEX Triumph X-PET Scanner Using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU-4 Standards

被引:0
|
作者
Prasad, Rameshwar [1 ]
Ratib, Osman [1 ]
Zaidi, Habib [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Nucl Med, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Geneva Neurosci Ctr, Geneva, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
PET; preclinical imaging; performance evaluation; NEMA; rodents; SMALL-ANIMAL PET; IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION; RESOLUTION; MICROPET; DESIGN; SENSITIVITY; DETECTOR; CAMERA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this work was to evaluate the performance characteristics of the preclinical X-PET subsystem of the FLEX Triumph PET/CT scanner based on the NU 4-2008 standards of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Methods: The performance parameters evaluated include the spatial resolution, scatter fraction, count losses and random coincidences, sensitivity, and image-quality characteristics. The PET detector array consisted of 11,520 individual bismuth germanate crystals arranged in 48 rings and 180 blocks, with an axial field of view (FOV) of 11.6 cm and a inner ring diameter of 16.5 cm. The spatial resolution was measured with a small Na-22 point source (diameter, 0.25 mm) at different radial offsets from the center. Sensitivity was calculated using the same source by stepping the source axially through the axial FOV of the scanner. Scatter fraction and counting-rate performances were determined using a mouse-and rat-sized phantom with an F-18 line source insert. The NEMA image-quality phantom and rodent imaging were also performed to access the overall imaging capabilities of the scanner. Results: Tangential spatial resolution in terms of full width at half maximum varied between 2.2 mm at the center of the FOV and 2.3 mm at a radial offset of 2.5 cm. The radial spatial resolution varied between 2.0 at the center and 4.4 mm at a radial offset of 2.3 cm. The peak system absolute sensitivity was 5.9% at the center of the FOV. The absolute system sensitivity was 0.67 counts/s/Bq, and the relative total system sensitivity was 73.9%. The scatter fraction for the mouse-sized phantom was 7.9%, with a peak true counting rate of 168 kilocounts per second (kcps) at 0.3 MBq/mL and a peak noise-equivalent counting rate of 106 kcps at 0.17 MBq/ mL. The rat-sized phantom had a scatter fraction of 21%, with a peak true counting rate of 93 kcps at 0.034 MBq/mL and a peak noise-equivalent counting rate of 49 kcps at 0.02 MBq/mL. Recovery coefficients for the image-quality phantom ranged from 0.13 to 0.88. Conclusion: The performance of the X-PET scanner based on the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards was fully characterized. The overall performance demonstrates that the X-PET system is suitable for preclinical research.
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1615
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] PET performance evaluation of the small-animal Hyperion IID PET/MRI insert based on the NEMA NU-4 standard
    Hallen, Patrick
    Schug, David
    Weissler, Bjoern
    Gebhardt, Pierre
    Salomon, Andre
    Kiessling, Fabian
    Schulz, Volkmar
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2018, 4 (06):
  • [22] Performance characteristics obtained for a new 3-dimensional lutetium oxylorthosilicate-based whole-body PET/CT scanner with the national electrical manufacturers association NU 2-2001 standard
    Brambilla, M
    Secco, C
    Dominietto, M
    Matheoud, R
    Sacchetti, G
    Inglese, E
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (12) : 2083 - 2091
  • [23] Impact of contamination from scatter phantom in National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2007 standards on image quality.
    Shimizu, K.
    Matsumoto, K.
    Fukukita, H.
    Hayashi, M.
    Suzuki, K.
    Kitamura, H.
    Daisaki, H.
    Abe, M.
    Sakurai, M.
    Murakami, K.
    Senda, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2009, 36 : S492 - S492
  • [24] Performance evaluation of a small-animal PET scanner with 213 mm axis using NEMA NU 4-2008
    Wei, Qing
    Wang, Yingjie
    Huang, Xianchao
    Li, Daowu
    Zheng, Yushuang
    Wang, Peilin
    Sun, Xiaoli
    Chai, Pei
    Han, Xiaorou
    Liu, Shuangquan
    Feng, Baotong
    Zhou, Wei
    Zeng, Xiangtao
    Zhu, Meiling
    Zhang, Zhiming
    Wei, Long
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024,
  • [25] Comparison of the Performance Evaluation of the MicroPET R4 Scanner According to NEMA Standards NU 4-2008 and NU 2-2001
    Popota, Fotini D.
    Aguiar, Pablo
    Raul Herance, J.
    Pareto, Deborah
    Rojas, Santiago
    Ros, Domenec
    Pavia, Javier
    Domingo Gispert, Juan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2012, 59 (05) : 1879 - 1886
  • [26] First Test Results of a Commercially Available Clinical PET Scanner Using the NEMA NU 4-2008 Small Animal PET Standards
    Luo, Weidong
    Anashkin, Edward
    Matthews, Chris G.
    2008 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (2008 NSS/MIC), VOLS 1-9, 2009, : 3991 - 3996
  • [27] Performance evaluation of siemens CTI ECAT EXACT 47 PET scanner using NEMA NU2-2001
    Kim, JS
    Lee, JS
    Lee, DS
    Jung, JK
    Lee, MC
    2004 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-7, 2004, : 3118 - 3120
  • [28] Image quality assessment for several positron emitters using the NEMA NU 4 2008 standards in the Inveon small-animal PET scanner
    Disselhorst, Jonathan
    Brom, Maarten
    Laverman, Peter
    Slump, Cornelis
    Boerman, Otto
    Oyen, Wim
    Gotthardt, Martin
    Visser, Eric
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 51
  • [29] Performance Evaluation of a PET of 7T Bruker Micro-PET/MR Based on NEMA NU 4-2008 Standards
    Doss, Kishore Krishnagiri Manoj
    Mion, Pei En
    Kao, Yu-Chieh Jill
    Kuo, Tsung-Ter
    Chen, Jyh-Cheng
    ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (14)
  • [30] The jPET-D4: Performance evaluation of four-layer DOI-PET scanner using the NEMA NU2-2001 standard
    Yoshida, Eiji
    Kobayashi, Ayako
    Yamaya, Taiga
    Watanabe, Mitsuo
    Nishikido, Fumihiko
    Kitamura, Keishi
    Hasegawa, Tomoyuki
    Fukushi, Masahiro
    Murayama, Hideo
    2006 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOL 1-6, 2006, : 2532 - 2536