Core Elements of Shared Decision-making for Women Considering Breast Cancer Screening: Results of a Modified Delphi Survey

被引:12
|
作者
Croes, Kenneth D. [1 ]
Jones, Nathan R. [1 ]
DuBenske, Lori L. [2 ]
Schrager, Sarina B. [2 ]
Mahoney, Jane E. [2 ]
Little, Terry A. [2 ]
Burnside, Elizabeth S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Survey Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI 53726 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
breast cancer screening; health communication; decision-making; mammography; Delphi consensus; CONSENSUS; MAMMOGRAPHY; FRAMEWORK; CRITERIA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-019-05298-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends individualized breast cancer screening for average-risk women before age 50, advised by risk assessment and shared decision-making (SDM). However, the foundational principles of this recommendation that would inform decision support tools for patients and primary care physicians at the point of care have not been codified. Determining the core elements of SDM for breast cancer screening as valued by patients and primary care providers (PCPs) is necessary for implementing effective SDM tools. The aim of this study is to affirm core elements of SDM in the context of clinical interactions, through a Delphi consensus process. Methods A Delphi was conducted with 30 participants (10 women aged 40-49, 10 PCPs, and 10 healthcare decision scientists), to codify core elements of breast cancer screening SDM. The criterion for establishing consensus was a threshold of 80% agreement. The Delphi concluded with an 83% response rate. Results Of 48 items fielded, 44 met the threshold on the high-importance end of the response scale and were accepted as core elements. Core elements across three thematic categories-information delivery and patient education, interpersonal clinician-patient communication, and framework of the decision-received panelists' support in nearly equal measure. Panelists unanimously agreed that SDM should include provision of clearly understandable information, including that of personal breast cancer risk factors, and benefits and harms of mammography screening, and that PCPs should convey they are listening, knowledgeable, and demonstrate cultural sensitivity. Discussion This research codifies the core elements of SDM for mammography in women 40-49, augmenting the evidence to inform discussions between patients and physicians. These core elements of SDM have the potential to operationalize SDM for breast cancer screening in an effort to improve public health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1668 / 1677
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] In-person and Telephonic Shared Decision-making Visits for People Considering Lung Cancer Screening An Assessment of Decision Quality
    Tanner, Nichole T.
    Banas, Emerald
    Yeager, Derik
    Dai, Lin
    Halbert, Chanita Hughes
    Silvestri, Gerard A.
    CHEST, 2019, 155 (01) : 236 - 238
  • [42] Pilot Evaluation of Patient-centered Survey Tools for Breast Cancer Screening Decision-making in Women 75 and Older
    Beckmeyer, Annamarie
    Smith, Rachel M.
    Miles, Laura
    Schonberg, Mara A.
    Toland, Amanda Ewart
    Hirsch, Heather
    HEALTH BEHAVIOR AND POLICY REVIEW, 2020, 7 (01): : 13 - 18
  • [43] Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
    Li, Xuejing
    Meng, Meiqi
    Zhao, Junqiang
    Zhang, Xiaoyan
    Yang, Dan
    Fang, Jiaxin
    Wang, Junxin
    Han, Liu
    Hao, Yufang
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2021, 15 : 2763 - 2781
  • [44] Pharmacotherapy decision-making among patients with breast cancer in Japan: results of an online survey
    Chikako Shimizu
    Yukinori Sakata
    Ruiko Sakai
    Hiroki Ikezawa
    Yoshiki Uetaki
    Toshiyuki Matsuoka
    Breast Cancer, 2019, 26 : 799 - 807
  • [45] The Conundrum and Challenge of Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-making Implementation
    Marilyn M. Schapira
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 989 - 990
  • [46] Impact of the shared decision-making process on lung cancer screening decisions
    Tan, Naomi Q. P.
    Nishi, Shawn P. E.
    Lowenstein, Lisa M.
    Mendoza, Tito R.
    Lopez-Olivo, Maria A.
    Crocker, Laura C.
    Sepucha, Karen R.
    Volk, Robert J.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (03): : 790 - 797
  • [47] Pharmacotherapy decision-making among patients with breast cancer in Japan: results of an online survey
    Shimizu, Chikako
    Sakata, Yukinori
    Sakai, Ruiko
    Ikezawa, Hiroki
    Uetaki, Yoshiki
    Matsuoka, Toshiyuki
    BREAST CANCER, 2019, 26 (06) : 799 - 807
  • [48] Impact of a Lung Cancer Screening Counseling and Shared Decision-Making Visit
    Mazzone, Peter J.
    Tenenbaum, Amanda
    Seeley, Meredith
    Petersen, Hilary
    Lyon, Christina
    Han, Xiaozhen
    Wang, Xiao-Feng
    CHEST, 2017, 151 (03) : 572 - 578
  • [49] The Effect of a Shared Decision-Making Process on Acceptance of Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Verma, Prateek
    Cohen, Kenneth
    Berke, Ethan M.
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2022, 20 (01) : 89 - 89
  • [50] The Conundrum and Challenge of Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-making Implementation
    Schapira, Marilyn M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (07) : 989 - +