Core Elements of Shared Decision-making for Women Considering Breast Cancer Screening: Results of a Modified Delphi Survey

被引:12
|
作者
Croes, Kenneth D. [1 ]
Jones, Nathan R. [1 ]
DuBenske, Lori L. [2 ]
Schrager, Sarina B. [2 ]
Mahoney, Jane E. [2 ]
Little, Terry A. [2 ]
Burnside, Elizabeth S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Survey Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI 53726 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
breast cancer screening; health communication; decision-making; mammography; Delphi consensus; CONSENSUS; MAMMOGRAPHY; FRAMEWORK; CRITERIA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-019-05298-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends individualized breast cancer screening for average-risk women before age 50, advised by risk assessment and shared decision-making (SDM). However, the foundational principles of this recommendation that would inform decision support tools for patients and primary care physicians at the point of care have not been codified. Determining the core elements of SDM for breast cancer screening as valued by patients and primary care providers (PCPs) is necessary for implementing effective SDM tools. The aim of this study is to affirm core elements of SDM in the context of clinical interactions, through a Delphi consensus process. Methods A Delphi was conducted with 30 participants (10 women aged 40-49, 10 PCPs, and 10 healthcare decision scientists), to codify core elements of breast cancer screening SDM. The criterion for establishing consensus was a threshold of 80% agreement. The Delphi concluded with an 83% response rate. Results Of 48 items fielded, 44 met the threshold on the high-importance end of the response scale and were accepted as core elements. Core elements across three thematic categories-information delivery and patient education, interpersonal clinician-patient communication, and framework of the decision-received panelists' support in nearly equal measure. Panelists unanimously agreed that SDM should include provision of clearly understandable information, including that of personal breast cancer risk factors, and benefits and harms of mammography screening, and that PCPs should convey they are listening, knowledgeable, and demonstrate cultural sensitivity. Discussion This research codifies the core elements of SDM for mammography in women 40-49, augmenting the evidence to inform discussions between patients and physicians. These core elements of SDM have the potential to operationalize SDM for breast cancer screening in an effort to improve public health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1668 / 1677
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lack of Shared Decision Making in Cancer Screening Discussions Results from a National Survey
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Elmore, Joann G.
    Fairfield, Kathleen M.
    Gerstein, Bethany S.
    Levin, Carrie A.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 47 (03) : 251 - 259
  • [22] Decision-Making Processes for Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Screening: The DECISIONS Survey
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Lewis, Carmen L.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    Couper, Mick P.
    Barry, Michael J.
    Elmore, Joann G.
    Levin, Carrie A.
    Van Hoewyk, John
    Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2010, 30 : 53S - 64S
  • [23] DECISION-MAKING PREFERENCES IN CANCER SCREENING: RESULTS FROM A NATIONALLY REPRESENTATIVE SURVEY
    von Wagner, Christian
    Jones, Craig
    Waller, Jo
    Simon, Alice
    Hammersley, Vicky
    Campbell, Christine
    Wardle, Jane
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2012, 43 : S135 - S135
  • [24] Development of support material for health professionals who are implementing Shared Decision-making in breast cancer screening: validation using the Delphi technique
    Jose Hernandez-Leal, Maria
    Codern-Bove, Nuria
    Jose Perez-Lacasta, Maria
    Cardona, Angels
    Vidal-Lancis, Carmen
    Carles-Lavila, Misericordia
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [25] Patient Information and Shared Decision-Making for Postoperative Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Results of a Patient Survey in North Rhine-Westphalian Breast Centers
    Steffen, P.
    Kowalski, C.
    Scheibler, F.
    Wuerstlein, R.
    Pfaff, H.
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2009, 69 (11) : 1005 - 1011
  • [26] Disparities Associated with Shared Decision-making in Prostate Cancer Screening
    Basin, Michael F.
    Crane, Kelly
    Basnet, Alina
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Shapiro, Oleg
    Jacob, Joseph M.
    Bratslavsky, Gennady
    Goldberg, Hanan
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2023, 9 (06): : 1008 - 1015
  • [27] Shared decision-making before prostate cancer screening decisions
    Pekala, Kelly R.
    Shill, Daniela K.
    Austria, Mia
    Langford, Aisha T.
    Loeb, Stacy
    Carlsson, Sigrid V.
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2024, 21 (06) : 329 - 338
  • [28] The Impact of Comorbidities on Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-making
    Kale, M. S.
    Schnur, J.
    Wisnivesky, J. P.
    Diefenbach, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 207
  • [29] The future of colorectal cancer screening: Parentalism or shared decision-making?
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Helsingen, Lise M.
    Kalager, Mette
    Vandvik, Per-Olav
    Agoritsas, Thomas
    Guyatt, Gordon
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2020, 192 (18) : E484 - E484
  • [30] DISPARITIES REGARDING SHARED DECISION-MAKING IN PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING
    Basin, Michael
    Basnet, Alina
    Shapiro, Oleg
    Jacob, Joseph
    Bratslavsky, Gennady
    Goldberg, Hanan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E339 - E340