Core Elements of Shared Decision-making for Women Considering Breast Cancer Screening: Results of a Modified Delphi Survey

被引:12
|
作者
Croes, Kenneth D. [1 ]
Jones, Nathan R. [1 ]
DuBenske, Lori L. [2 ]
Schrager, Sarina B. [2 ]
Mahoney, Jane E. [2 ]
Little, Terry A. [2 ]
Burnside, Elizabeth S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Survey Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI 53726 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
breast cancer screening; health communication; decision-making; mammography; Delphi consensus; CONSENSUS; MAMMOGRAPHY; FRAMEWORK; CRITERIA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-019-05298-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends individualized breast cancer screening for average-risk women before age 50, advised by risk assessment and shared decision-making (SDM). However, the foundational principles of this recommendation that would inform decision support tools for patients and primary care physicians at the point of care have not been codified. Determining the core elements of SDM for breast cancer screening as valued by patients and primary care providers (PCPs) is necessary for implementing effective SDM tools. The aim of this study is to affirm core elements of SDM in the context of clinical interactions, through a Delphi consensus process. Methods A Delphi was conducted with 30 participants (10 women aged 40-49, 10 PCPs, and 10 healthcare decision scientists), to codify core elements of breast cancer screening SDM. The criterion for establishing consensus was a threshold of 80% agreement. The Delphi concluded with an 83% response rate. Results Of 48 items fielded, 44 met the threshold on the high-importance end of the response scale and were accepted as core elements. Core elements across three thematic categories-information delivery and patient education, interpersonal clinician-patient communication, and framework of the decision-received panelists' support in nearly equal measure. Panelists unanimously agreed that SDM should include provision of clearly understandable information, including that of personal breast cancer risk factors, and benefits and harms of mammography screening, and that PCPs should convey they are listening, knowledgeable, and demonstrate cultural sensitivity. Discussion This research codifies the core elements of SDM for mammography in women 40-49, augmenting the evidence to inform discussions between patients and physicians. These core elements of SDM have the potential to operationalize SDM for breast cancer screening in an effort to improve public health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1668 / 1677
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The first step in shared decision-making for prostate cancer screening
    Takahashi, Takeshi
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 135 (05) : 874 - 874
  • [32] Physicians' Responsibilities in Shared Decision-making for Lung Cancer Screening
    De Allie, Gabrielle
    Tanksley, Parris
    Chang, Eric Y.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 179 (07) : 994 - 995
  • [33] DESIGNING A SHARED DECISION-MAKING TOOL FOR ADOLESCENTS WITH PSORIASIS USING A MODIFIED DELPHI METHOD
    Chen, Selena
    Dong, Sydney
    Jin, Sami SeungMi
    Galati, Aidan
    Fakhouri, Savannah
    Park, Helen
    Hightower, George
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2024, 104
  • [34] The importance of enabling informed decision making for women considering breast cancer screening Response
    Sasieni, P. D.
    Smith, R. A.
    Duffy, S. W.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2016, 23 (01) : 56 - 56
  • [35] Breast Cancer Screening in 2018 Time for Shared Decision Making
    Keating, Nancy L.
    Pace, Lydia E.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (17): : 1814 - 1815
  • [36] Decision aid for women considering breast cancer screening
    Pasternack, Iris
    Saalasti-Koskinen, Ulla
    Makela, Marjukka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2011, 27 (04) : 357 - 362
  • [37] Toward the Development of a Core Set of Outcome Domains to Assess Shared Decision-making Interventions in Rheumatology: Results from an OMERACT Delphi Survey and Consensus Meeting
    Toupin-April, Karine
    Barton, Jennifer
    Fraenkel, Liana
    Li, Linda C.
    Brooks, Peter
    De Wit, Maarten
    Stacey, Dawn
    Legare, France
    Meara, Alexa
    Shea, Beverley
    Lyddiatt, Anne
    Hofstetter, Cathie
    Gossec, Laure
    Christensen, Robin
    Scholte-Voshaar, Marieke
    Suarez-Almazor, Maria E.
    Boonen, Annelies
    Meade, Tanya
    March, Lyn
    Pohl, Christoph
    Jull, Janet Elizabeth
    Sivarajah, Sigogini
    Campbell, Willemina
    Alten, Rieke
    Karuranga, Suvi
    Morgan, Esi
    Kaufman, Jessica
    Hill, Sophie
    Maxwell, Lara J.
    Welch, Vivian
    Beaton, Dorcas
    El-Miedany, Yasser
    Tugwell, Peter S.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 44 (10) : 1544 - 1550
  • [38] Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a survey of willingness in women and family physicians to engage in shared decision-making
    Legare, France
    St-Jacques, Sylvie
    Gagnon, Susie
    Njoya, Merlin
    Brisson, Michel
    Fremont, Pierre
    Rousseau, Francois
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2011, 31 (04) : 319 - 326
  • [39] DECISION-MAKING AND THE PRINCIPLES OF SCREENING FOR BREAST-CANCER
    PAUKER, SG
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1992, 47 : 142 - 147
  • [40] Informed decision-making and breast cancer screening: An oxymoron?
    Braillon, Alain
    HEALTH POLICY, 2021, 125 (01) : 130 - 131