Pilot Evaluation of Patient-centered Survey Tools for Breast Cancer Screening Decision-making in Women 75 and Older

被引:1
|
作者
Beckmeyer, Annamarie [1 ]
Smith, Rachel M. [2 ]
Miles, Laura [3 ]
Schonberg, Mara A. [4 ]
Toland, Amanda Ewart [5 ,6 ]
Hirsch, Heather [7 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biomed Informat, Ctr Biostat & Biomed Informat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Internal Med, Div Gen Med, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Gen Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Canc Biol & Genet, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[6] Ohio State Univ, Dept Internal Med, Div Human Genet, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Womens Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
HEALTH BEHAVIOR AND POLICY REVIEW | 2020年 / 7卷 / 01期
关键词
breast cancer screening; healthcare for older women; healthcare decision-making; healthcare decision-aid; breast cancer over-screening; HEALTH-STATUS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RECOMMENDATION;
D O I
10.14485/HBPR.7.1.2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Breast cancer screening recommendations in women >= 75 years of age vary. Studies show harm with over-screening, and limited benefit in mammography for women with short life expectancy; however, many women >= 75 years continue screening. We pilot-tested a validated decision-aid in women >= 75 years to evaluate feasibility of implementation in an internal medicine clinic with secondary objectives to determine if it improved knowledge about mammogram screening recommendations and/or changed intent to screen. Methods: Eligible women were mailed a pre-intervention survey assessing their knowledge of breast cancer and screening. At a routine appointment they were given a decision-aid on yearly screening after age 75. Following this appointment they completed a post-intervention survey. Results: Overall, 28% (N = 16) of eligible participants enrolled, with 8 completing the study. Pre-intervention, all participants planned to get a screening mammogram in the next year; post-intervention, 63% planned to continue screening. Conclusions: Women >= 75 years of age may consider changing their screening schedule based on a decision-aid given at a well-visit appointment. Challenges included a small sample size and need for better recruitment techniques in this population.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:13 / 18
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-centered decision-making
    Beach, Mary Catherine
    Callon, Wynne
    Boss, Emily
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [2] Multi-pilot implementation experiences of patient-centered pathology reports: lessons learned for the advancement of patient-centered tools for cancer decision-making
    Austin, Elizabeth J. J.
    Kilgore, Mark R. R.
    Ko, Cynthia W. W.
    Parker, Elizabeth U. U.
    Alvarez, Rebeca
    Koch, Lisa K. K.
    Donlan, Amelia W. W.
    Lee, Janie M. M.
    Flanagan, Meghan R. R.
    DeStefano, Lauren M. M.
    Javid, Sara H. H.
    Gore, John L. L.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2023, 34 (04) : 399 - 406
  • [3] Multi-pilot implementation experiences of patient-centered pathology reports: lessons learned for the advancement of patient-centered tools for cancer decision-making
    Elizabeth J. Austin
    Mark R. Kilgore
    Cynthia W. Ko
    Elizabeth U. Parker
    Rebeca Alvarez
    Lisa K. Koch
    Amelia W. Donlan
    Janie M. Lee
    Meghan R. Flanagan
    Lauren M. DeStefano
    Sara H. Javid
    John L. Gore
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2023, 34 : 399 - 406
  • [4] Editorial Comment: Prostate cancer screening: the case for patient-centered shared decision-making
    Blute, Michael L.
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2012, 9 (01) : 3 - 4
  • [5] Patient-Centered Decision-Making in Metastatic Breast Cancer Care Delivery: A Call to Action
    Rocque, Gabrielle B.
    Patel, Manali I.
    Wallner, Lauren P.
    Bailey, Stacy C.
    Schear, Rebekkah
    Gunn, Christine M.
    Rivers, Jamil
    Wilson, Rozanne
    Freeman, Emily C.
    Buckingham, Trudy L.
    May, Suepattra G.
    Kamal, Arif H.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2024, 22 (01):
  • [6] Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Centered Decision-Making
    Bjerring J.C.
    Busch J.
    Philosophy & Technology, 2021, 34 (2) : 349 - 371
  • [7] Advancing Patient-Centered Shared Decision-Making with AI Systems for Older Adult Cancer Patients
    Hao, Yuexing
    Liu, Zeyu
    Riter, Robert N.
    Kalantari, Saleh
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYTEMS, CHI 2024, 2024,
  • [8] An Editorial Response to the USPTF Prostate cancer screening: the case for patient-centered shared decision-making
    Kim, Simon P.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2012, 9 (01) : 5 - 8
  • [9] Prostate cancer screening: the case for patient-centered shared decision-making Editor's Comments
    Nehra, Ajay
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2012, 9 (01) : 2 - 2
  • [10] Patient-centered Shared Decision-making: A Public Imperative
    Coylewright, Megan
    Montori, Victor
    Ting, Henry H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 125 (06): : 545 - 547