Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in long-term deafened cats

被引:31
|
作者
George, Shefin S. [1 ,2 ]
Wise, Andrew K. [1 ,2 ]
Fallon, James B. [1 ,2 ]
Shepherd, Robert K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Bion Inst, East Melbourne 3002, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med Bion, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
cochlear implant; current focusing; electrode configuration; spatial tuning curve; inferior colliculus; deafness; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; SPIRAL GANGLION; SPATIAL SELECTIVITY; SPEECH RECOGNITION; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; SPECTRAL CHANNELS; AUDITORY-NERVE; TRIPOLAR; PERCEPTION; EXCITATION;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2560/12/3/036003
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Focused multipolar (FMP) stimulation has been shown to produce restricted neural activation using intracochlear stimulation in animals with a normal population of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs). However, in a clinical setting, the widespread loss of SGNs and peripheral fibres following deafness is expected to influence the effectiveness of FMP. Approach. We compared the efficacy of FMP stimulation to both monopolar (MP) and tripolar (TP) stimulation in long-term deafened cat cochleae (n = 8). Unlike our previous study, these cochleae contained <10% of the normal SGN population adjacent to the electrode array. We also evaluated the effect of electrode position on stimulation modes by using either modiolar facing or lateral wall facing half-band electrodes. The spread of neural activity across the inferior colliculus, a major nucleus within the central auditory pathway, was used as a measure of spatial selectivity. Main results. In cochleae with significant SGN degeneration, we observed that FMP and TP stimulation resulted in greater spatial selectivity than MP stimulation (p < 0.001). However, thresholds were significantly higher for FMP and TP stimulation compared to MP stimulation (p < 0.001). No difference between FMP and TP stimulation was found in any measures. The high threshold levels for FMP stimulation was significantly reduced without compromising spatial selectivity by varying the degree of current focusing (referred as 'partial-FMP' stimulation). Spatial selectivity of all stimulation modes was unaffected by the electrode position. Finally, spatial selectivity in long-term deafened cochleae was significantly less than that of cochleae with normal SGN population (George S S et al 2014 J. Neural Eng. 11 065003). Significance. The present results indicate that the greater spatial selectivity of FMP and TP stimulation over MP stimulation is maintained in cochleae with significant neural degeneration and is not adversely affected by electrode position. The greater spatial selectivity of FMP and TP stimulation would be expected to result in improved clinical performance.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long-term electrode impedance changes and failure prevalence in cochlear implants
    Newbold, Carrie
    Risi, Frank
    Hollow, Rodney
    Yusof, Yusmeera
    Dowell, Richard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 54 (07) : 453 - 460
  • [22] Pediatric Cochlear Implants in Prelingual Deafness: Medium and Long-Term Outcomes
    Kaplan, Daniel M.
    Puterman, Moshe
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 12 (02): : 107 - 109
  • [23] Deficit of long-term memory traces for words in children with cochlear implants
    Zhang, Long-Long
    Zhong, Ya-Qin
    Sun, Jing-Wu
    Chen, Lin
    Sun, Jia-Qiang
    Hou, Xiao-Yan
    Chen, Jian-Wen
    Guo, Xiao-Tao
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 131 (06) : 1323 - 1331
  • [24] Long-term results by using cochlear Implants on children: Systematic review
    Tanamati, Liege Franzini
    Costa, Orozimbo Alves
    Bevilacqua, Maria Cecilia
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2011, 15 (03) : 365 - 375
  • [25] Long-term experience with biohybrid cochlear implants in human neurosensory restoration
    Fenov, Dragana Mitovska
    Salcher, Rolf
    Kludt, Eugen
    Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke
    Harre, Jennifer
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Giesemann, Anja
    Warnecke, Athanasia
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 25 (03) : 171 - 181
  • [26] The effect of long-term deafness on speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult CLARION® cochlear implant users
    Geier, L
    Barker, M
    Fisher, L
    Opie, J
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 108 (04): : 80 - 83
  • [27] Gom2n: a software to simulate multipolar neural stimulation for cochlear implants
    Laforet, Jeremy
    Falcone, Jessica
    Veau, Nicolas
    Guiraud, David
    2011 5TH INTERNATIONAL IEEE/EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING (NER), 2011, : 216 - 219
  • [28] Prospective long-term auditory results of cochlear implantation in prelinguistically deafened children: The importance of early implantatione
    Manrique, M
    Cervera-Paz, FJ
    Huarte, A
    Molina, M
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2004, 124 : 55 - 63
  • [29] Long-term Benefit of Unilateral Cochlear Implantation on Quality of Life and Speech Perception in Bilaterally Deafened Patients
    Haeussler, Sophia M.
    Knopke, Steffen
    Wiltner, Philipp
    Ketterer, Manuel
    Graebel, Stefan
    Olze, Heidi
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2019, 40 (04) : E430 - E440
  • [30] Long-Term Evaluation of Cochlear Implantation in Cogan Syndrome
    Kontorinis, Georgios
    Giourgas, Alexandros
    Neuburger, Juergen
    Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke
    Lenarz, Thomas
    ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY AND ITS RELATED SPECIALTIES, 2010, 72 (05): : 275 - 279