Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures

被引:21
|
作者
Otero, Jesse E. [1 ]
Martin, John R. [1 ]
Rowe, Taylor M. [1 ]
Odum, Susan M. [1 ]
Mason, John B. [1 ]
机构
[1] OrthoCarolina Res Inst, OrthoCarolina Hip & Knee Ctr, 2001 Vail Ave,Ste 200A, Charlotte, NC 28208 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2020年 / 35卷 / 04期
关键词
bone loss; revision total hip arthroplasty; modular tapered fluted stem; femoral revision; outcomes; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; PERIPROSTHETIC FEMUR FRACTURES; POROUS-COATED STEMS; BONE LOSS; DISTAL FIXATION; TITANIUM STEMS; FOLLOW-UP; COMPONENT; REPLACEMENT; PROSTHESIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.039
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Extensive femoral bone loss poses a challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Many techniques have been developed to address this problem including fully porous cylindrical stems, impaction bone grafting, and cementation of long stems, which have had varied success. Modular tapered fluted femoral stems (MTFS) show favorable results. We sought to determine the minimum 2-year radiographic and clinical performance of MTFS in rTHA in a population with extensive proximal femoral bone loss. Methods: Our clinical database was queried retrospectively for all patients who underwent rTHA with an MTFS. We included patients with Paprosky 3 and 4 femoral bone loss and patients with Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femur fractures. Patients without 2-year follow-up were invited to return to clinic for X-ray evaluation and to complete clinical questionnaires. We assessed distance of stem subsidence and presence of stem fixation on final X-ray. We recorded all-cause revision and survival of the stem at final follow-up. Results: One hundred twenty-nine patients were available for follow-up. Average follow-up time was 3.75 years. One hundred twenty-two stems (95%) remained in place at final follow-up. Median subsidence was 1.4 mm (range 0-21). All-cause revision rate was 16.3% (21 patients). Of the hips revised, 10 were for instability, 6 for infection, 1 for aseptic loosening, and 1 for periprosthetic femur fracture. Three were revised for other reasons. The stem was revised in 7 patients (5.4%), and the most common reason for stem revision was infection (5 patients). The other 2 stems were revised for aseptic loosening in a Paprosky 4 femur and periprosthetic femur fracture. Survival of tapered modular fluted stems with aseptic failure as an endpoint was 98.4%. The mean Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement score at final follow-up was 73, and mean Veterans Rand 12 item health survey physical and mental scores were 32.8 and 52.2, respectively. Conclusion: In patients with Paprosky 3, 4 femoral defects or Vancouver type B2, B3 fractures, modular tapered fluted stems for femoral revision show excellent outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1073
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Consecutive Series of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Contemporary Monoblock Versus Modular Revision Stems: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes
    Siljander, Breana R.
    Chandi, Sonia K.
    Coxe, Francesca R.
    Nguyen, Joseph T.
    Sculco, Peter K.
    Chalmers, Brian P.
    Bostrom, Mathias P.
    Gausden, Elizabeth B.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (09): : S213 - S219
  • [32] Comparable outcomes of in-cement revision and uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture at 5 years
    Klasan, Antonio
    Millar, James
    Quayle, Jonathan
    Farrington, Bill
    Misur, Peter Nicholas
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2022, 142 (06) : 1039 - 1046
  • [33] Principles of managing Vancouver type B periprosthetic fractures around cemented polished tapered femoral stems
    Quah C.
    Porteous M.
    Stephen A.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2017, 27 (4) : 477 - 482
  • [34] Comparable outcomes of in-cement revision and uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture at 5 years
    Antonio Klasan
    James Millar
    Jonathan Quayle
    Bill Farrington
    Peter Nicholas Misur
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2022, 142 : 1039 - 1046
  • [35] Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: clinical and radiological outcomes from a tertiary care center
    Stefano Tornago
    Luca Cavagnaro
    Lorenzo Mosconi
    Francesco Chiarlone
    Andrea Zanirato
    Nicolò Patroniti
    Matteo Formica
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 6919 - 6926
  • [36] Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Hip Revision Surgery and Cerclage Wires Fixation for Vancouver B2 and B3 Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Di Matteo, Vincenzo
    La Camera, Francesco
    Carfi, Carla
    Morenghi, Emanuela
    Grappiolo, Guido
    Loppini, Mattia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (03)
  • [37] Cement-in-Cement Femoral Revision for the Treatment of Highly Selected Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Fractures
    Richards, Corey J.
    Duncan, Clive P.
    Crawford, Ross W.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (02): : 335 - 337
  • [38] Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: clinical and radiological outcomes from a tertiary care center
    Tornago, Stefano
    Cavagnaro, Luca
    Mosconi, Lorenzo
    Chiarlone, Francesco
    Zanirato, Andrea
    Patroniti, Nicolo
    Formica, Matteo
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (11) : 6919 - 6926
  • [39] REVISION ARTHROPLASTY VERSUS OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION OF VANCOUVER TYPE-B2 AND B3 PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES
    Haider, Thomas
    Hanna, Philip
    Mohamadi, Amin
    Merchan, Nelson
    McNichol, Megan
    Wixted, John J.
    Appleton, Paul T.
    Nazarian, Ara
    von Keudell, Arvind G.
    Rodriguez, Edward K.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [40] An algorithm for the treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures
    Sledge, JB
    Abiri, A
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (07): : 887 - 892