A Consecutive Series of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Contemporary Monoblock Versus Modular Revision Stems: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

被引:1
|
作者
Siljander, Breana R. [1 ]
Chandi, Sonia K. [1 ]
Coxe, Francesca R. [1 ]
Nguyen, Joseph T. [1 ]
Sculco, Peter K. [1 ]
Chalmers, Brian P. [1 ]
Bostrom, Mathias P. [1 ]
Gausden, Elizabeth B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2024年 / 39卷 / 09期
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; modular stem; monoblock stem; revision; periprosthetic femur fracture; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FLUTED TITANIUM STEMS; FEMORAL REVISION; TAPERED STEMS; DISTAL FIXATION; SHORT-TERM; SUBSIDENCE; DIFFERENCE; MANAGEMENT; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.046
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems are the implant design of choice for managing Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs), producing reliable results over the past few decades. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B2 PFFs treated with contemporary monoblock versus modular TFTs. Methods: A consecutive series of 113 patients ( 72 women, 64%, mean age 70 years [range, 26 to 96]) who had a B2 PFF were treated with either a monoblock (n = 42) or modular (n = 71) TFT stem between 2008 and 2021. The mean body mass index was 30 +/- 7. The mean follow-up was 2.9 years. A radiographic review was performed to assess leg length and offset restoration, endosteal cortical contact length, and stem subsidence. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to determine survivorship without revision, reoperation, or dislocation. Results: There was no difference in the restoration of leg length (0.3 +/- 8.0 mm) or offset (2.8 +/- 8.2 mm) between the monoblock and modular cohorts (P > .05). Mean endosteal cortical contact length (47.2 +/- 26.6 versus 46.7 +/- 2 6.4 mm, P 1/4 .89) and stem subsidence (2.7 +/- 3.5 versus 2.4 +/- 3.2 mm, P 1/4 .66) did not differ. No difference in patient-reported outcome measures (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement; Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical and Mental; visual analog score; and Lower Extremity Activity Scale) between the groups was observed. Survivorship at 2 years free from reoperation, revision, and dislocation was 90.4, 90.3, and 97.6%, respectively, for the monoblock cohort; and 84.0, 86.9, and 90.0%, respectively, for the modular cohort. Conclusions: No significant differences in radiographic or clinical outcomes were observed between patients treated with monoblock or modular TFTs in this large series of B2 PFFs. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S213 / S219
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cement-in-cement versus uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures
    Kennedy, John W.
    Hrycaiczuk, Alex
    Ng, Nigel Y. B.
    Sheerins, Owen
    Patil, Sanjeev R.
    Jones, Bryn G.
    Stark, Andrew
    Meek, R. M. Dominic
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 31 : 124 - 128
  • [2] Comparative study of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures treated by internal fixation versus stem revision
    Martinov, Sagi
    D'ulisse, Sebastien
    Haumont, Edouard
    Schiopu, Dragos
    Reynders, Pieter
    Illes, Tamas
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2022, 142 (12) : 3589 - 3597
  • [3] Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures
    Otero, Jesse E.
    Martin, John R.
    Rowe, Taylor M.
    Odum, Susan M.
    Mason, John B.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (04): : 1069 - 1073
  • [4] Comparative study of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures treated by internal fixation versus stem revision
    Sagi Martinov
    Sebastien D’ulisse
    Edouard Haumont
    Dragos Schiopu
    Pieter Reynders
    Tamás Illés
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2022, 142 : 3589 - 3597
  • [5] Monoblock tapered stems in management of UCS B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Thomas, J.
    Shichman, I.
    Ohanisian, L.
    Stoops, T. K.
    Lawrence, K. W.
    Ashkenazi, I.
    Watson, D. T.
    Schwarzkopf, R.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2023, 4 (08): : 551 - 558
  • [6] The management of Vancouver B1 and C periprosthetic fractures: radiographic and clinic outcomes of a monocentric consecutive series
    Ciriello, Vincenzo
    Chiarpenello, Roberto
    Tomarchio, Alessandro
    Marra, Francesco
    Egidio, Antonio Carmine
    Piovani, Lucio
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 30 (2_SUPPL) : 94 - 100
  • [7] Radiologic outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation for cementless stems in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures
    Park, Jong-Seok
    Hong, Sijohn
    Nho, Jae-Hwi
    Kang, Deokwon
    Choi, Hyung-Suk
    Suh, You-Sung
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2019, 53 (01) : 24 - 29
  • [8] Is ORIF the better treatment for periprosthetic Vancouver type B2 femur fractures?
    Schelling, Georg
    Antoniadis, Alexander
    Helmy, Nader
    Camenzind, Roland
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2017, 147 : 47S - 47S
  • [9] An alternate concept for the treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femur fractures
    Forberger, Jens
    Beck, Martin
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2012, 142 : S24 - S24
  • [10] Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures treated with revision total hip arthroplasty
    Amenabar, Tomas
    Rahman, Wael A.
    Avhad, Vineet V.
    Vera, Ramiro
    Gross, Allan E.
    Kuzyk, Paul R.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (10) : 1927 - 1932