A Consecutive Series of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Contemporary Monoblock Versus Modular Revision Stems: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

被引:1
|
作者
Siljander, Breana R. [1 ]
Chandi, Sonia K. [1 ]
Coxe, Francesca R. [1 ]
Nguyen, Joseph T. [1 ]
Sculco, Peter K. [1 ]
Chalmers, Brian P. [1 ]
Bostrom, Mathias P. [1 ]
Gausden, Elizabeth B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2024年 / 39卷 / 09期
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; modular stem; monoblock stem; revision; periprosthetic femur fracture; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FLUTED TITANIUM STEMS; FEMORAL REVISION; TAPERED STEMS; DISTAL FIXATION; SHORT-TERM; SUBSIDENCE; DIFFERENCE; MANAGEMENT; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.046
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems are the implant design of choice for managing Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs), producing reliable results over the past few decades. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B2 PFFs treated with contemporary monoblock versus modular TFTs. Methods: A consecutive series of 113 patients ( 72 women, 64%, mean age 70 years [range, 26 to 96]) who had a B2 PFF were treated with either a monoblock (n = 42) or modular (n = 71) TFT stem between 2008 and 2021. The mean body mass index was 30 +/- 7. The mean follow-up was 2.9 years. A radiographic review was performed to assess leg length and offset restoration, endosteal cortical contact length, and stem subsidence. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to determine survivorship without revision, reoperation, or dislocation. Results: There was no difference in the restoration of leg length (0.3 +/- 8.0 mm) or offset (2.8 +/- 8.2 mm) between the monoblock and modular cohorts (P > .05). Mean endosteal cortical contact length (47.2 +/- 26.6 versus 46.7 +/- 2 6.4 mm, P 1/4 .89) and stem subsidence (2.7 +/- 3.5 versus 2.4 +/- 3.2 mm, P 1/4 .66) did not differ. No difference in patient-reported outcome measures (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement; Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical and Mental; visual analog score; and Lower Extremity Activity Scale) between the groups was observed. Survivorship at 2 years free from reoperation, revision, and dislocation was 90.4, 90.3, and 97.6%, respectively, for the monoblock cohort; and 84.0, 86.9, and 90.0%, respectively, for the modular cohort. Conclusions: No significant differences in radiographic or clinical outcomes were observed between patients treated with monoblock or modular TFTs in this large series of B2 PFFs. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S213 / S219
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of complications in 97 periprosthetic Vancouver B2 fractures treated either by internal fixation or revision arthroplasty
    H. Eckardt
    D. Windischbauer
    M. Morgenstern
    K. Stoffel
    M. Clauss
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2024, 144 : 1647 - 1653
  • [22] Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate
    Spina M.
    Scalvi A.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2018, 28 (6) : 1133 - 1142
  • [23] Immediate weightbearing is safe after revision total hip arthroplasty for Vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic femur fractures
    Gopinath, Rohan
    Oster, Brittany A.
    Mixa, Patrick J.
    Costales, Timothy G.
    Johnson, Aaron J.
    Manson, Theodore T.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2024, 55 (03):
  • [24] Hip Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Fractures of Vancouver Type B2 and B3
    Fink, Bernd
    Grossmann, Alexandra
    Singer, Joachim
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2012, 26 (04) : 206 - 211
  • [25] Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of Vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur
    Levine, Brett R.
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    Lewis, Paul
    Berger, Richard A.
    Sporer, Scott M.
    Paprosky, Wayne
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (04): : 527 - 533
  • [26] Comparable outcomes of in-cement revision and uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture at 5 years
    Klasan, Antonio
    Millar, James
    Quayle, Jonathan
    Farrington, Bill
    Misur, Peter Nicholas
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2022, 142 (06) : 1039 - 1046
  • [27] Comparable outcomes of in-cement revision and uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture at 5 years
    Antonio Klasan
    James Millar
    Jonathan Quayle
    Bill Farrington
    Peter Nicholas Misur
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2022, 142 : 1039 - 1046
  • [28] Cemented vs cementless stems for revision arthroplasties due to Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fracture
    Lara-Taranchenko, Yuri
    Nomdedeu Jr, Josep F.
    Martinez, Andres Aliaga
    Mimendia, Inaki
    Barro, Victor M.
    Collado, Diego
    Guerra-Farfan, Ernesto
    Hernandez, Alejandro
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 34 (05): : 2573 - 2580
  • [29] Osteosynthesis versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gonzalez-Martin, David
    Enrique Hernandez-Castillejo, Luis
    Herrera-Perez, Mario
    Luis Pais-Brito, Jose
    Gonzalez-Casamayor, Sergio
    Garrido-Miguel, Miriam
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2023, 49 (01) : 87 - 106
  • [30] Osteosynthesis versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    David González-Martín
    Luis Enrique Hernández-Castillejo
    Mario Herrera-Pérez
    José Luis Pais-Brito
    Sergio González-Casamayor
    Miriam Garrido-Miguel
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2023, 49 : 87 - 106