Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: clinical and radiological outcomes from a tertiary care center

被引:1
|
作者
Tornago, Stefano [1 ]
Cavagnaro, Luca [1 ]
Mosconi, Lorenzo [1 ]
Chiarlone, Francesco [2 ]
Zanirato, Andrea [3 ,5 ]
Patroniti, Nicolo [4 ,5 ]
Formica, Matteo [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Osped Santa Corona, Joint Replacement Unit, Ortopedia & Traumatol 2, Viale 25 Aprile 38, I-17027 Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy
[2] Ist Clin San Rocco Grp San Donato, UO Sez Ortopedia & Traumatol 1, Via Sabbioni 24, I-25050 Ome, BS, Italy
[3] Policlin San Martino, Clin Ortoped, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, I-16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
[4] Osped Santa Corona, Anesthesia & Intens Care Unit, Viale 25 Aprile,38, I-17027 Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy
[5] DISC, Dipartimento Sci Chirurg & Diagnost Integrate, Viale Benedetto XV 6, I-16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
关键词
Periprosthetic fracture; Total hip arthroplasty; Hip revision; Surgical technique; Outcomes; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; INTERNAL-FIXATION; CLASSIFICATION; MORTALITY; MANAGEMENT; FEMUR;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-023-04955-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to report mid-term clinical and radiographic results after hip arthroplasty revision in Vancouver type B2 femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFx). Specifical focus of the paper is as follows: (1) the description of a standardized and reproducible surgical technique, (2) functional outcomes presentation and (3) type and number of complications and implants' survival rate analysis.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients treated for hip revision with non-modular tapered fluted titanium stem in patients with Vancouver type B2 femur PPFx at a single institution. At least 18 months' follow-up period was required. Harris Hip Scores and SF-12 were obtained, and radiographical follow-up was performed. Complications were reported and analyzed.ResultsThe authors included 114 patients (114 hips) with a mean follow-up of 62.8 & PLUSMN; 30.6 months. All patients were treated with Wagner SL revision hip stem (Zimmer-Biomet), metal cerclage wires & PLUSMN; trochanteric plate. The mean HHS and SF-12 score at the last follow-up evaluation were respectively 81.3 & PLUSMN; 9.7 and 32.5 & PLUSMN; 7.6. Seventeen (14.9%) complications occurred. We observed five cases of dislocations, two of periprosthetic joint infections and six cases of new PPFx. The stem-related revision rate for any cause at the final FU was 1.7%, due to PJI. No patients underwent stem revision surgery for aseptic loosening. Fracture healed in all the included patients with a union-rate of 100%. The re-operation rate for any cause was 9.6%, with an implant survival rate for overall failure of 96.5%.ConclusionThe presented standard and reproducible surgical technique obtains optimal clinical and radiological results with limited complication rate at mid-term follow up. Preoperative planning as well as careful intraoperative surgical technique is of a paramount importance.
引用
收藏
页码:6919 / 6926
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: clinical and radiological outcomes from a tertiary care center
    Stefano Tornago
    Luca Cavagnaro
    Lorenzo Mosconi
    Francesco Chiarlone
    Andrea Zanirato
    Nicolò Patroniti
    Matteo Formica
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 6919 - 6926
  • [2] Treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Carl Haasper
    Mohammad Ali Enayatollahi
    Thorsten Gehrke
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 1989 - 1993
  • [3] Treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Haasper, Carl
    Enayatollahi, Mohammad Ali
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (10) : 1989 - 1993
  • [4] Mortality and clinical outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Takami, H.
    Takegami, Y.
    Tokutake, K.
    Kurokawa, H.
    Iwata, M.
    Terasawa, S.
    Oguchi, T.
    Imagama, S.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2023, 4 (01): : 38 - 45
  • [5] An algorithm for the treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures
    Sledge, JB
    Abiri, A
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (07): : 887 - 892
  • [6] Management of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fractures
    Shekleton, F.
    Baker, W.
    Dominguez, E.
    Harries, L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [7] A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Khan, T.
    Grindlay, D.
    Ollivere, B. J.
    Scammell, B. E.
    Manktelow, A. R. J.
    Pearson, R. G.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2017, 99B (04): : 17 - 25
  • [8] Outcomes After Operative Fixation of Vancouver B2 and B3 Type Periprosthetic Fractures
    Barghi, Ameen
    Hanna, Philip
    Merchan, Nelson
    Lechtig, Aron
    Haggerty, Christopher
    Weaver, Michael J.
    von Keudell, Arvind
    Wixted, John
    Appleton, Paul
    Rodriguez, Edward
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2022, 36 (05) : 228 - 233
  • [9] The Stability of Fixation of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Effect of Implantation Technique
    Frangie, Robert
    Han, Shuyang
    Noble, Philip C.
    Gold, Jonathan E.
    Lanfermeijer, Nicholas D.
    Reddy, Kartik I.
    Ismaily, Sabir K.
    Su, Jacob
    Schroder, Steven J.
    Rodriguez-Quintana, David
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (07): : S292 - S297
  • [10] Is ORIF the better treatment for periprosthetic Vancouver type B2 femur fractures?
    Schelling, Georg
    Antoniadis, Alexander
    Helmy, Nader
    Camenzind, Roland
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2017, 147 : 47S - 47S