Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: clinical and radiological outcomes from a tertiary care center

被引:1
|
作者
Tornago, Stefano [1 ]
Cavagnaro, Luca [1 ]
Mosconi, Lorenzo [1 ]
Chiarlone, Francesco [2 ]
Zanirato, Andrea [3 ,5 ]
Patroniti, Nicolo [4 ,5 ]
Formica, Matteo [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Osped Santa Corona, Joint Replacement Unit, Ortopedia & Traumatol 2, Viale 25 Aprile 38, I-17027 Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy
[2] Ist Clin San Rocco Grp San Donato, UO Sez Ortopedia & Traumatol 1, Via Sabbioni 24, I-25050 Ome, BS, Italy
[3] Policlin San Martino, Clin Ortoped, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, I-16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
[4] Osped Santa Corona, Anesthesia & Intens Care Unit, Viale 25 Aprile,38, I-17027 Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy
[5] DISC, Dipartimento Sci Chirurg & Diagnost Integrate, Viale Benedetto XV 6, I-16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
关键词
Periprosthetic fracture; Total hip arthroplasty; Hip revision; Surgical technique; Outcomes; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; INTERNAL-FIXATION; CLASSIFICATION; MORTALITY; MANAGEMENT; FEMUR;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-023-04955-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to report mid-term clinical and radiographic results after hip arthroplasty revision in Vancouver type B2 femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFx). Specifical focus of the paper is as follows: (1) the description of a standardized and reproducible surgical technique, (2) functional outcomes presentation and (3) type and number of complications and implants' survival rate analysis.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients treated for hip revision with non-modular tapered fluted titanium stem in patients with Vancouver type B2 femur PPFx at a single institution. At least 18 months' follow-up period was required. Harris Hip Scores and SF-12 were obtained, and radiographical follow-up was performed. Complications were reported and analyzed.ResultsThe authors included 114 patients (114 hips) with a mean follow-up of 62.8 & PLUSMN; 30.6 months. All patients were treated with Wagner SL revision hip stem (Zimmer-Biomet), metal cerclage wires & PLUSMN; trochanteric plate. The mean HHS and SF-12 score at the last follow-up evaluation were respectively 81.3 & PLUSMN; 9.7 and 32.5 & PLUSMN; 7.6. Seventeen (14.9%) complications occurred. We observed five cases of dislocations, two of periprosthetic joint infections and six cases of new PPFx. The stem-related revision rate for any cause at the final FU was 1.7%, due to PJI. No patients underwent stem revision surgery for aseptic loosening. Fracture healed in all the included patients with a union-rate of 100%. The re-operation rate for any cause was 9.6%, with an implant survival rate for overall failure of 96.5%.ConclusionThe presented standard and reproducible surgical technique obtains optimal clinical and radiological results with limited complication rate at mid-term follow up. Preoperative planning as well as careful intraoperative surgical technique is of a paramount importance.
引用
收藏
页码:6919 / 6926
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures-Beyond B2
    Uzoigwe, Chika Edward
    Watts, Arun Thor
    Briggs, Praise
    Symes, Tom
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2024, 8 (08):
  • [22] Is primary osteosynthesis the better treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures Vancouver type B2?
    Antoniadis, A.
    Camenzind, R.
    Schelling, G.
    Helmy, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 17 - 17
  • [23] Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in the Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures
    Munro, Jacob T.
    Garbuz, Donald S.
    Masri, Bassam A.
    Duncan, Clive P.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (02) : 590 - 598
  • [24] Fracture fixation versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a systematic review
    Stoffel, Karl
    Blauth, Michael
    Joeris, Alexander
    Blumenthal, Andrea
    Rometsch, Elke
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (10) : 1381 - 1394
  • [25] Fracture fixation versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a systematic review
    Karl Stoffel
    Michael Blauth
    Alexander Joeris
    Andrea Blumenthal
    Elke Rometsch
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2020, 140 : 1381 - 1394
  • [26] Cement-in-Cement Femoral Revision for the Treatment of Highly Selected Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Fractures
    Richards, Corey J.
    Duncan, Clive P.
    Crawford, Ross W.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (02): : 335 - 337
  • [27] Treatment Results of a Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Case Series: Treatment Method for Vancouver Type B2 Fractures Can Be Customized
    Niikura, Takahiro
    Lee, Sang Yang
    Sakai, Yoshitada
    Nishida, Kotaro
    Kuroda, Ryosuke
    Kurosaka, Masahiro
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2014, 6 (02) : 138 - 145
  • [28] Vancouver type-B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture
    Ferrara, JM
    Wood, RD
    Uhl, RL
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 29 (05) : 423 - 424
  • [29] Selected Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished femoral components can be safely treated with osteosynthesis
    Slullitel, P. A.
    Garcia-Barreiro, G. G.
    Onativia, J., I
    Zanotti, G.
    Comba, F.
    Piccaluga, F.
    Buttaro, M. A.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2021, 103B (07): : 1222 - 1230
  • [30] Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate
    Spina M.
    Scalvi A.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2018, 28 (6) : 1133 - 1142