Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures

被引:21
|
作者
Otero, Jesse E. [1 ]
Martin, John R. [1 ]
Rowe, Taylor M. [1 ]
Odum, Susan M. [1 ]
Mason, John B. [1 ]
机构
[1] OrthoCarolina Res Inst, OrthoCarolina Hip & Knee Ctr, 2001 Vail Ave,Ste 200A, Charlotte, NC 28208 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2020年 / 35卷 / 04期
关键词
bone loss; revision total hip arthroplasty; modular tapered fluted stem; femoral revision; outcomes; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; PERIPROSTHETIC FEMUR FRACTURES; POROUS-COATED STEMS; BONE LOSS; DISTAL FIXATION; TITANIUM STEMS; FOLLOW-UP; COMPONENT; REPLACEMENT; PROSTHESIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.039
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Extensive femoral bone loss poses a challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Many techniques have been developed to address this problem including fully porous cylindrical stems, impaction bone grafting, and cementation of long stems, which have had varied success. Modular tapered fluted femoral stems (MTFS) show favorable results. We sought to determine the minimum 2-year radiographic and clinical performance of MTFS in rTHA in a population with extensive proximal femoral bone loss. Methods: Our clinical database was queried retrospectively for all patients who underwent rTHA with an MTFS. We included patients with Paprosky 3 and 4 femoral bone loss and patients with Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femur fractures. Patients without 2-year follow-up were invited to return to clinic for X-ray evaluation and to complete clinical questionnaires. We assessed distance of stem subsidence and presence of stem fixation on final X-ray. We recorded all-cause revision and survival of the stem at final follow-up. Results: One hundred twenty-nine patients were available for follow-up. Average follow-up time was 3.75 years. One hundred twenty-two stems (95%) remained in place at final follow-up. Median subsidence was 1.4 mm (range 0-21). All-cause revision rate was 16.3% (21 patients). Of the hips revised, 10 were for instability, 6 for infection, 1 for aseptic loosening, and 1 for periprosthetic femur fracture. Three were revised for other reasons. The stem was revised in 7 patients (5.4%), and the most common reason for stem revision was infection (5 patients). The other 2 stems were revised for aseptic loosening in a Paprosky 4 femur and periprosthetic femur fracture. Survival of tapered modular fluted stems with aseptic failure as an endpoint was 98.4%. The mean Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement score at final follow-up was 73, and mean Veterans Rand 12 item health survey physical and mental scores were 32.8 and 52.2, respectively. Conclusion: In patients with Paprosky 3, 4 femoral defects or Vancouver type B2, B3 fractures, modular tapered fluted stems for femoral revision show excellent outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1073
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 Periprosthetic Proximal Femoral Fractures by Distal Locking Femoral Stem (Cannulok) in Patients 75 Years and Older
    El-Bakoury, Ahmed
    Hosny, Hazem
    Williams, Mark
    Keenan, Jonathan
    Yarlagadda, Rathan
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (02): : 541 - 545
  • [22] Management of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fractures
    Shekleton, F.
    Baker, W.
    Dominguez, E.
    Harries, L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [23] Treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Carl Haasper
    Mohammad Ali Enayatollahi
    Thorsten Gehrke
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 1989 - 1993
  • [24] Treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Haasper, Carl
    Enayatollahi, Mohammad Ali
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (10) : 1989 - 1993
  • [25] Management of Vancouver type B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using an uncemented extensively porous-coated long femoral stem prosthesis
    Canbora K.
    Kose O.
    Polat A.
    Aykanat F.
    Gorgec M.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2013, 23 (5) : 545 - 552
  • [26] Mortality and clinical outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Takami, H.
    Takegami, Y.
    Tokutake, K.
    Kurokawa, H.
    Iwata, M.
    Terasawa, S.
    Oguchi, T.
    Imagama, S.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2023, 4 (01): : 38 - 45
  • [27] Revision hip arthroplasty as a treatment of Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures without bone grafting
    Wang, Jia-Qi
    Gao, You-Shui
    Mei, Jiong
    Rao, Zhi-Tao
    Wang, Shu-Qing
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 47 (05) : 449 - 453
  • [28] Revision hip arthroplasty as a treatment of Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures without bone grafting
    Jia-Qi Wang
    You-Shui Gao
    Jiong Mei
    Zhi-Tao Rao
    Shu-Qing Wang
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2013, 47 : 449 - 453
  • [29] Mid- and long-term efficacy of surgical treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Sun, Jian-Ning
    Zhang, Yu
    Zhang, Ye
    Zhang, Jia-Ming
    Chen, Xiang-Yang
    Feng, Shuo
    BMC SURGERY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [30] Mid- and long-term efficacy of surgical treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Jian-Ning Sun
    Yu Zhang
    Ye Zhang
    Jia-Ming Zhang
    Xiang-Yang Chen
    Shuo Feng
    BMC Surgery, 20