Intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine for pain relief in labour (RESPITE): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

被引:54
|
作者
Wilson, Matthew J. A. [1 ]
MacArthur, Christine [2 ]
Hewitt, Catherine A. [2 ]
Handley, Kelly [2 ]
Gao, Fang [3 ]
Beeson, Leanne [2 ]
Daniels, Jane [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield S1 4DA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Res Labs, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Clin Trials Unit, Nottingham, England
来源
LANCET | 2018年 / 392卷 / 10148期
关键词
CHILDBIRTH; MEPERIDINE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31613-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background About a third of women receiving pethidine for labour pain subsequently require an epidural, which provides effective pain relief but increases the risk of instrumental vaginal delivery. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in labour is an alternative to pethidine, but is not widely used. We aimed to evaluate epidural analgesia progression among women using remifentanil PCA compared with pethidine. Methods We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial in 14 UK maternity units. We included women aged 16 years or older, beyond 37 weeks' gestation, in labour with a singleton cephalic presentation, and who requested opioid pain relief. We randomly assigned eligible participants (1: 1) to either the intravenous remifentanil PCA group (40 mu g bolus on demand with a 2 min lockout) or the intramuscular pethidine group (100 mg every 4 h, up to 400 mg in 24 h), using a web-based or telephone randomisation service with a minimisation algorithm for parity, maternal age, ethnicity, and mode of labour onset. Because of the differences in routes of drug administration, study participants and health-care providers were not masked to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who received epidural analgesia after enrolment for pain relief in labour. Primary analyses were unadjusted and analysed by the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN29654603. Findings Between May 13, 2014, and Sept 2, 2016, 201 women were randomly assigned to the remifentanil PCA group and 200 to the pethidine group. One participant in the pethidine group withdrew consent, leaving 199 for analyses. The proportions of epidural conversion were 19% (39 of 201) in the remifentanil PCA group and 41% (81 of 199) in the pethidine group (risk ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.66; p<0.0001). There were no serious adverse events or drug reactions directly attributable to either analgesic during the study. Interpretation Intravenous remifentanil PCA halved the proportion of epidural conversions compared with intramuscular pethidine. This finding challenges routine pethidine use as standard of care in labour. Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 672
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine for pain relief in labour: the RESPITE randomised controlled trial
    Daniels, J.
    MacArthur, C.
    Hewitt, C.
    Handley, K.
    Smith, F. G.
    Beeson, L.
    Daniels, J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 : 128 - 128
  • [2] The RESPITE trial: remifentanil intravenously administered patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus pethidine intramuscular injection for pain relief in labour: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Matthew Wilson
    Christine MacArthur
    Fang Gao Smith
    Leanne Homer
    Kelly Handley
    Jane Daniels
    Trials, 17
  • [3] The RESPITE trial: remifentanil intravenously administered patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus pethidine intramuscular injection for pain relief in labour: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Wilson, Matthew
    MacArthur, Christine
    Smith, Fang Gao
    Homer, Leanne
    Handley, Kelly
    Daniels, Jane
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [4] Intravenous Hydromorphone Patient-Controlled Analgesia Versus Intramuscular Pethidine for Analgesia in Acute Pancreatitis: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chen, Z.
    Jiang, K.
    Liu, F.
    Zhu, P.
    Cai, F.
    He, Y.
    Jin, T.
    Lin, Z.
    Liu, T.
    Jiang, R.
    Li, Q.
    Yang, X.
    Guo, J.
    Sutton, R.
    Windsor, J. A.
    Deng, L.
    Huang, W.
    Xia, Q.
    PANCREAS, 2020, 49 (10) : 1402 - 1402
  • [5] A double-blind randomised comparison of intravenous patient-controlled remifentanil with intramuscular pethidine for labour analgesia
    Ng, T. K. T.
    Cheng, B. C. P.
    Chan, W. S.
    Lam, K. K.
    Chan, M. T. V.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (09) : 796 - 801
  • [6] Safety and efficacy of intravenous hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine in acute pancreatitis: An open-label, randomized controlled trial
    Chen, Zhiyao
    Jiang, Kun
    Liu, Fei
    Zhu, Ping
    Cai, Fei
    He, Yanqiu
    Jin, Tao
    Lin, Ziqi
    Li, Qian
    Hu, Cheng
    Tan, Qingyuan
    Yang, Xiaonan
    Guo, Jia
    Huang, Wei
    Deng, Lihui
    Xia, Qing
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [7] Remifentanil by patient-controlled analgesia compared with intramuscular meperidine for pain relief in labour
    Thurlow, JA
    Laxton, CH
    Dick, A
    Waterhouse, P
    Sherman, L
    Goodman, NW
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (03) : 374 - 378
  • [8] Labour pain with remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia: a randomised equivalence trial
    Logtenberg, S. L. M.
    Rengerink, K. Oude
    Verhoeven, C. J.
    Freeman, L. M.
    van den Akker, E. S. A.
    Godfried, M. B.
    van Beek, E.
    Borchert, O. W. H. M.
    Schuitemaker, N.
    van Woerkens, E. C. S. M.
    Hostijn, I.
    Middeldorp, J. M.
    van der Post, J. A.
    Mol, B. W.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (04) : 652 - 660
  • [9] Diamorphine for pain relief in labour: a randomised controlled trial comparing intramuscular injection and patient-controlled analgesia
    McInnes, RJ
    Hillan, E
    Clark, D
    Gilmour, H
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 111 (10) : 1081 - 1089
  • [10] A comparison of pethidine and remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour
    Volikas, I
    Male, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2001, 10 (02) : 86 - 90