Aerosol Delivery Using Jet Nebulizer and Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer During High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation: An In Vitro Comparison

被引:15
|
作者
Fang, Tien-Pei [1 ,6 ]
Lin, Hui-Ling [3 ]
Chiu, Shu-Hua [1 ]
Wang, Szu-Hui [1 ]
DiBlasi, Robert M. [4 ]
Tsai, Ying-Huang [2 ]
Fink, James B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Resp Therapy, Chiayi, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Chiayi, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Resp Therapy, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Dept Resp Therapy, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Georgia State Univ, Div Resp Therapy, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[6] Chang Gung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Resp Care, Chiayi Campus, Taiwan
关键词
aerosol delivery; breathing patterns; high frequency oscillatory ventilation; jet nebulizer; vibrating mesh nebulizer; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; FLOW; POSITION;
D O I
10.1089/jamp.2015.1265
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: High frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) is used in critically ill patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the efficiency of aerosol delivery with different lung parameters during simulated neonatal, pediatric, and adult HFOV. Methods: Sensormedics 3100A/B ventilators were used to deliver infant, pediatric, and adult HFOV. Two types of aerosol generators were chosen for testing: 1) a continuous jet nebulizer (JN) with a unit-dose of 5.0 mg/2.5 mL salbutamol sulfate diluted into 4 mL, and 2) a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with salbutamol sulfate were run to completion of aerosol generation. Both aerosol devices were placed 1) between the ventilator circuit and the endotracheal tube (ETT) (proximal position); and 2) at the inlet of the heated humidifier (distal position) (n = 5). Drug was collected on a bacterial filter placed distal to the ETT, and the drug eluted and analyzed with a UV Spectrophotometer at 276 nm. T-test and ANOVA tests were used for comparison (p < 0.05). Results: The inhaled drug delivered by JN was 0%-0.6% of the nominal dose when placed at distal position, and 0%-3% at proximal position (p < 0.01), while the VMN was 0%-0.5% at distal and 8.6%-22.7% at proximal position (p < 0.01). Aerosol delivery during HFOV was greater with adult settings than pediatric and infant settings with VMN and JN (22.7%, 8.6%, and 17.4% respectively, p < 0.01). When the aerosol delivery device was placed at the distal position, negligible drug mass was observed (<0.5%), regardless of the nebulizer device used. Conclusions: During HFOV, aerosol delivery with the nebulizer placed at proximal was greater than placement distal from the ETT, with VMN delivering more drug than JN. The inhaled drug was delivery correlated positively with ETT size, MAP, and bias flow, and inversely proportional to power settings.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 453
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of the Application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Feng, Zhouzhou
    Han, Zhengcai
    Wang, Yaqin
    Guo, Hong
    Liu, Jian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2024, 19 : 829 - 839
  • [32] Delivery of High Solubility Polyols by Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer to Enhance Mucociliary Clearance
    Chan, John Gar Yan
    Traini, Daniela
    Chan, Hak-Kim
    Young, Paul M.
    Kwok, Philip Chi Lip
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2012, 25 (05) : 297 - 305
  • [33] A comparison of the delivery of inhaled drugs by jet nebulizer and vibrating mesh nebulizer using dual-source dual-energy computed tomography in rabbits: a preliminary in vivo study
    Wang, Qixing
    Liu, Yuhao
    Zhu, Zhengfang
    Hu, Jian
    Li, Li
    Wang, Sheng
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (17)
  • [34] Omron NE U22: Comparison Between Vibrating Mesh and Jet Nebulizer
    Skaria, Shibu
    Smaldone, Gerald C.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2010, 23 (03) : 173 - 180
  • [35] AEROSOL DELIVERY FROM A VIBRATING MESH NEBULIZER WITH HOLDING CHAMBER IN HELIUM/OXYGEN VERSUS AIR
    Finlay, P.
    Martin, A. R.
    Katz, I. M.
    Vecellio, L.
    Caillibotte, G.
    Venegas, J. G.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 26 (02) : A20 - A20
  • [36] Improvement of an In Vitro Model to Assess Delivered Dose and Particle Size for a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer During Mechanical Ventilation
    Kadrichu, Nani
    Daniher, Derek
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2018, 31 (02) : 94 - 102
  • [37] Aerosol Delivery to the Lung Is More Efficient Using an Extension with a Standard Jet Nebulizer than an Open-Vent Jet Nebulizer
    Pitance, L.
    Reychler, G.
    Leal, T.
    Reychler, H.
    Liistro, G.
    Montharu, J.
    Diot, P.
    Vecellio, L.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 26 (04) : 208 - 214
  • [38] A Comparison Study: Treat Acute Bronchiolitis Infants with Hypertonic Saline by Small Volume Jet Nebulizer and Portable Vibrating-Mesh Nebulizer
    Chou, T.
    Chen, E.
    Liu, Y.
    Wu, I.
    Chien, M.
    Hsiao, H.
    Lai, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 197
  • [39] Jet versus vibrating mesh nebulizer for tobramycin aerosol in spontaneously breathing children with tracheostomies: A simulation study
    Anderson, Natalie V. E.
    Ditcham, William G. F.
    Clements, Barry S.
    von Ungern-Sternberg, Britta S.
    ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2025, 44 (01)
  • [40] Placement of the nebulizer before the humidifier during mechanical ventilation: Effect on aerosol delivery
    Moraine, Jean-Jacques
    Truflandier, Karine
    Vandenbergen, Nicolas
    Berre, Jacques
    Melot, Christian
    Vincent, Jean-Louis
    HEART & LUNG, 2009, 38 (05): : 435 - 439