Aerosol Delivery Using Jet Nebulizer and Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer During High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation: An In Vitro Comparison

被引:15
|
作者
Fang, Tien-Pei [1 ,6 ]
Lin, Hui-Ling [3 ]
Chiu, Shu-Hua [1 ]
Wang, Szu-Hui [1 ]
DiBlasi, Robert M. [4 ]
Tsai, Ying-Huang [2 ]
Fink, James B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Resp Therapy, Chiayi, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Chiayi, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Resp Therapy, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Dept Resp Therapy, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Georgia State Univ, Div Resp Therapy, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[6] Chang Gung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Resp Care, Chiayi Campus, Taiwan
关键词
aerosol delivery; breathing patterns; high frequency oscillatory ventilation; jet nebulizer; vibrating mesh nebulizer; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; FLOW; POSITION;
D O I
10.1089/jamp.2015.1265
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: High frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) is used in critically ill patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the efficiency of aerosol delivery with different lung parameters during simulated neonatal, pediatric, and adult HFOV. Methods: Sensormedics 3100A/B ventilators were used to deliver infant, pediatric, and adult HFOV. Two types of aerosol generators were chosen for testing: 1) a continuous jet nebulizer (JN) with a unit-dose of 5.0 mg/2.5 mL salbutamol sulfate diluted into 4 mL, and 2) a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with salbutamol sulfate were run to completion of aerosol generation. Both aerosol devices were placed 1) between the ventilator circuit and the endotracheal tube (ETT) (proximal position); and 2) at the inlet of the heated humidifier (distal position) (n = 5). Drug was collected on a bacterial filter placed distal to the ETT, and the drug eluted and analyzed with a UV Spectrophotometer at 276 nm. T-test and ANOVA tests were used for comparison (p < 0.05). Results: The inhaled drug delivered by JN was 0%-0.6% of the nominal dose when placed at distal position, and 0%-3% at proximal position (p < 0.01), while the VMN was 0%-0.5% at distal and 8.6%-22.7% at proximal position (p < 0.01). Aerosol delivery during HFOV was greater with adult settings than pediatric and infant settings with VMN and JN (22.7%, 8.6%, and 17.4% respectively, p < 0.01). When the aerosol delivery device was placed at the distal position, negligible drug mass was observed (<0.5%), regardless of the nebulizer device used. Conclusions: During HFOV, aerosol delivery with the nebulizer placed at proximal was greater than placement distal from the ETT, with VMN delivering more drug than JN. The inhaled drug was delivery correlated positively with ETT size, MAP, and bias flow, and inversely proportional to power settings.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 453
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AEROSOL BRONCHODILATOR DELIVERY DURING MECHANICAL VENTILATION - NEBULIZER OR INHALER
    HESS, D
    CHEST, 1991, 100 (04) : 1103 - 1104
  • [22] IN-VITRO / IN-VIVO COMPARISON OF INHALED SALBUTAMOL DOSE DELIVERED BY JET NEBULIZER, VIBRATING MESH NEBULIZER AND METERED DOSE INHALER WITH SPACER IN NON-INVASIVE VENTILATION
    Hassan, Ahmed
    Eldin, Randa Salah
    Abdelrahman, Maha M.
    Abdelrahim, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2017, 30 (03) : 2 - 2
  • [23] EVALUATION OF VIBRATING MESH NEBULIZER, JET NEBULIZER AND pMDI PERFORMANCE DURING SIMULATED ADULT AND PAEDIATRIC CPAP AND NIPPV
    Power, P.
    MacLoughlin, R.
    Wolny, M.
    Duffy, C.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 26 (02) : A50 - A51
  • [24] Bronchodilator Efficacy of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in COPD: Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus Jet Nebulizer
    Arunsurat, Itthiphat
    Rittayamai, Nuttapol
    Chuaychoo, Benjamas
    Tangchityongsiva, Suwat
    Promsarn, Simaporn
    Yuenyong, Somruthai
    Chow, Chung-Wai
    Brochard, Laurent
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2024, 69 (02) : 157 - 165
  • [25] Studies on aerosol delivery of plasmid DNA using a mesh Nebulizer
    Arulmuthu, Eugene R.
    Williams, David J.
    Baldascini, Helen
    Versteeg, Henk K.
    Hoare, Mike
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2007, 98 (05) : 939 - 955
  • [26] Effect of oxygen flow on aerosol delivery from a vibrating mesh nebulizer with a holding chamber
    Amin, Mohammed A.
    Taha, Hebatullah K.
    Hussein, Raghda R. S.
    Sarhan, Rania M.
    Abdelrahim, Mohamed E. A.
    BENI-SUEF UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [27] Effect of oxygen flow on aerosol delivery from a vibrating mesh nebulizer with a holding chamber
    Mohammed A. Amin
    Hebatullah K. Taha
    Raghda R. S. Hussein
    Rania M. Sarhan
    Mohamed E. A. Abdelrahim
    Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 11
  • [28] Anti-Tuberculosis Bacteriophage D29 Delivery with a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer, Jet Nebulizer, and Soft Mist Inhaler
    Carrigy, Nicholas B.
    Chang, Rachel Y.
    Leung, Sharon S. Y.
    Harrison, Melissa
    Petrova, Zaritza
    Pope, Welkin H.
    Hatfull, Graham F.
    Britton, Warwick J.
    Chan, Hak-Kim
    Sauvageau, Dominic
    Finlay, Warren H.
    Vehring, Reinhard
    PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 34 (10) : 2084 - 2096
  • [29] Anti-Tuberculosis Bacteriophage D29 Delivery with a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer, Jet Nebulizer, and Soft Mist Inhaler
    Nicholas B. Carrigy
    Rachel Y. Chang
    Sharon S. Y. Leung
    Melissa Harrison
    Zaritza Petrova
    Welkin H. Pope
    Graham F. Hatfull
    Warwick J. Britton
    Hak-Kim Chan
    Dominic Sauvageau
    Warren H. Finlay
    Reinhard Vehring
    Pharmaceutical Research, 2017, 34 : 2084 - 2096
  • [30] IN VITRO COMPARISON OF BREATH SYNCHRONIZED AND CONTINUOUS AEROSOL VIA VIBRATING MESH NEBULIZER WITH DIFFERENT POSITION AND FLOWS IN ADULT TRANS-NASAL AEROSOL DELIVERY
    Li, Jie
    Wu, Wei
    Fink, James B.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2019, 32 (03) : A20 - A20