Aerosol Delivery Using Jet Nebulizer and Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer During High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation: An In Vitro Comparison

被引:15
|
作者
Fang, Tien-Pei [1 ,6 ]
Lin, Hui-Ling [3 ]
Chiu, Shu-Hua [1 ]
Wang, Szu-Hui [1 ]
DiBlasi, Robert M. [4 ]
Tsai, Ying-Huang [2 ]
Fink, James B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Resp Therapy, Chiayi, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Chiayi, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Resp Therapy, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Dept Resp Therapy, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Georgia State Univ, Div Resp Therapy, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[6] Chang Gung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Resp Care, Chiayi Campus, Taiwan
关键词
aerosol delivery; breathing patterns; high frequency oscillatory ventilation; jet nebulizer; vibrating mesh nebulizer; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; FLOW; POSITION;
D O I
10.1089/jamp.2015.1265
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: High frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) is used in critically ill patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the efficiency of aerosol delivery with different lung parameters during simulated neonatal, pediatric, and adult HFOV. Methods: Sensormedics 3100A/B ventilators were used to deliver infant, pediatric, and adult HFOV. Two types of aerosol generators were chosen for testing: 1) a continuous jet nebulizer (JN) with a unit-dose of 5.0 mg/2.5 mL salbutamol sulfate diluted into 4 mL, and 2) a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with salbutamol sulfate were run to completion of aerosol generation. Both aerosol devices were placed 1) between the ventilator circuit and the endotracheal tube (ETT) (proximal position); and 2) at the inlet of the heated humidifier (distal position) (n = 5). Drug was collected on a bacterial filter placed distal to the ETT, and the drug eluted and analyzed with a UV Spectrophotometer at 276 nm. T-test and ANOVA tests were used for comparison (p < 0.05). Results: The inhaled drug delivered by JN was 0%-0.6% of the nominal dose when placed at distal position, and 0%-3% at proximal position (p < 0.01), while the VMN was 0%-0.5% at distal and 8.6%-22.7% at proximal position (p < 0.01). Aerosol delivery during HFOV was greater with adult settings than pediatric and infant settings with VMN and JN (22.7%, 8.6%, and 17.4% respectively, p < 0.01). When the aerosol delivery device was placed at the distal position, negligible drug mass was observed (<0.5%), regardless of the nebulizer device used. Conclusions: During HFOV, aerosol delivery with the nebulizer placed at proximal was greater than placement distal from the ETT, with VMN delivering more drug than JN. The inhaled drug was delivery correlated positively with ETT size, MAP, and bias flow, and inversely proportional to power settings.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 453
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EVALUATION OF VIBRATING MESH NEBULIZER PERFORMANCE DURING NASAL HIGH FLOW THERAPY
    MacLoughlin, R.
    Power, P.
    Wolny, M.
    Duffy, C.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 26 (02) : A51 - A52
  • [42] EFFECT OF A SPACER ON PULMONARY AEROSOL DEPOSITION FROM A JET NEBULIZER DURING MECHANICAL VENTILATION
    HARVEY, CJ
    ODOHERTY, MJ
    PAGE, CJ
    THOMAS, SHL
    NUNAN, TO
    TREACHER, DF
    THORAX, 1995, 50 (01) : 50 - 53
  • [43] Effect of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Aerosol Technology on the In Vitro Activity of Ribavirin Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus
    Walsh, Brian K.
    Liu, Yingguang
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2022, 67 (04) : 421 - 427
  • [44] A method for increasing jet nebulizer delivery efficiency for aerosol drug delivery in ventilated newborns:: An in vitro study
    Quong, Michael C.
    Thebaud, Bernard
    Finlay, Warren H.
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2006, 51 (11) : 1244 - 1250
  • [45] LATE-BREAKING ABSTRACT: Tomoscintigraphic comparison of lung deposition with a vibrating-mesh and a jet nebulizer
    Dugernier, Jonathan
    Reychler, Gregory
    Depoortere, Virginie
    Roeseler, Jean
    Michotte, Jean-Bernard
    Laterre, Pierre-Francois
    Jamar, Francois
    Hesse, Michel
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2015, 46
  • [46] Does placement of nebulizer before the humidifier improve aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation?
    Fink, JB
    Varshney, R
    Goode, M
    Fahey, PJ
    Tobin, MJ
    Dhand, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (03) : A86 - A86
  • [47] COMPARISON OF AEROSOL DELIVERY EFFICACY BY A SPECIALLY DESIGNED T-ADAPTOR WITH VIBRATING MESH NEBULIZER AND EXISTING PRODUCTS IN ADULT MECHANICAL VENTILATOR
    Huang, Chia-Chen
    Chen, Hsiang-Ling
    Hung, Chi-Shan
    Chen, Eric Y. T.
    Lin, Hui-Ling
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2018, 31 (02) : A7 - A7
  • [48] In vitro evaluation of spacers in comparison with T-adapters in mechanical ventilation with pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI) and vibrating mesh nebulizer
    Eckes, Myriam
    Poree, Thierry
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2019, 54
  • [49] In vitro evaluation of aerosol bronchodilator delivery during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation:: Effect of ventilator settings and nebulizer position
    Chatmongkolchart, S
    Schettino, GPP
    Dillman, C
    Kacmarek, RM
    Hess, DR
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (11) : 2515 - 2519
  • [50] Aerosol Delivery During High Frequency Jet Ventilation: An MRI Evaluation
    Sood, Beena G.
    Latif, Zahid
    Shen, Yimin
    Galli, Robert J.
    Dunlap, Charles W.
    Gelmini, Matthew J.
    Haacke, E. Mark
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2012, 57 (11) : 1901 - 1907