Comparison of the Application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Feng, Zhouzhou [1 ]
Han, Zhengcai [1 ]
Wang, Yaqin [1 ]
Guo, Hong [1 ]
Liu, Jian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 1, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Gansu Cent Hosp, Gansu Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 1, Dept Clin Med, 1 Donggang West Rd, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
关键词
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; aerosol; vibrating mesh nebulizers; jet nebulizers; meta-analysis; AEROSOL DRUG-DELIVERY; METERED-DOSE INHALER; IN-VITRO; COPD; FLOW; VENTILATION; BRONCHODILATORS; DEVICES; SPACER;
D O I
10.2147/COPD.S452191
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To comparison of the application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Research Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statements. The primary outcome measures analyzed included: The amount of inhaler in the urine sample at 30 minutes after inhalation therapy (USAL0.5), The total amount of inhaler in urine sample within 24 hours (USAL24), Aerosol emitted, Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), Forced vital capacity (FVC). Results: Ten studies were included with a total of 314 study participants, including 157 subjects in the VMN group and 157 subjects in the JN group. The data analysis results of USAL0.5, MD (1.88 [95% CI, 0.95 to 2.81], P = 0.000), showed a statistically significant difference. USAL24, MD (1.61 [95% CI, 1.14 to 2.09], P = 0.000), showed a statistically significant difference. The results of aerosol emitted showed a statistically significant difference in MD (3.44 [95% CI, 2.84 to 4.04], P = 0.000). The results of FEV1 showed MD (0.05 [95% CI, -0.24 to 0.35], P=0.716), the results were not statistically significant. The results of FVC showed MD (0.11 [95% CI, -0.18 to 0.41], P=0.459), the results were not statistically significant. It suggests that VMN is better than JN and provides higher aerosols, but there is no difference in improving lung function between them. Conclusion: VMN is significantly better than JN in terms of drug delivery and utilization in the treatment of patients with COPD. However, in the future use of nebulizers, it is important to select a matching nebulizer based on a combination of factors such as mechanism of action of the nebulizer, disease type and comorbidities, ventilation strategies and modes, drug formulations, as well as cost-effectiveness, in order to achieve the ideal treatment of COPD.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 839
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of bronchodilator administration with vibrating mesh nebulizer and standard jet nebulizer in the emergency department
    Dunne, Robert B.
    Shortt, Sandra
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (04): : 641 - 646
  • [2] Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer
    Blais, Christianne M.
    Cockcroft, Donald W.
    Veilleux, Justine
    Boulay, Marie-Eve
    Boulet, Louis-Philippe
    Gauvreau, Gail M.
    Scime, Tara X.
    Watson, Richard M.
    O'Byrne, Paul M.
    Davis, Beth E.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2018, 31 (02) : 88 - 93
  • [3] A Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer as an Alternative to the Collison Three-Jet Nebulizer for Infectious Disease Aerobiology
    Bowling, Jennifer D.
    O'Malley, Katherine J.
    Klimstra, William B.
    Hartman, Amy L.
    Reed, Douglas S.
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 85 (17)
  • [4] Aerosol Delivery of Recombinant Human DNase I: In Vitro Comparison of a Vibrating-Mesh Nebulizer With a Jet Nebulizer
    Johnson, Jeremy C.
    Waldrep, J. Clifford
    Guo, Jennifer
    Dhand, Rajiv
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2008, 53 (12) : 1703 - 1708
  • [5] Aerosol Delivery Using Jet Nebulizer and Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer During High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation: An In Vitro Comparison
    Fang, Tien-Pei
    Lin, Hui-Ling
    Chiu, Shu-Hua
    Wang, Szu-Hui
    DiBlasi, Robert M.
    Tsai, Ying-Huang
    Fink, James B.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2016, 29 (05) : 447 - 453
  • [6] Comparison of clinical outcomes following delivery of budesonide by both vibrating mesh nebulizer and jet nebulizer in premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia
    Zhou, Jian-Fu
    Zhang, Yi-Bing
    Zhang, Zhi-Wei
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11
  • [7] Omron NE U22: Comparison Between Vibrating Mesh and Jet Nebulizer
    Skaria, Shibu
    Smaldone, Gerald C.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2010, 23 (03) : 173 - 180
  • [8] Indacaterol for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chung, Vincent C. H.
    Ma, Polly H. X.
    Hui, David S. C.
    Tam, Wilson W. S.
    Tang, Jin Ling
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08):
  • [9] NEBULIZER USE FOR CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE IN THE VETERAN POPULATION
    Murali, Sindhubarathi
    Kirk, Melanie
    Zerdan, Maroun Bou
    Habib, Gaston
    Addo-Yobo, Emmanuel
    Cohen, Rubin I.
    CHEST, 2023, 164 (04) : 5008A - 5008A
  • [10] A Comparison Study: Treat Acute Bronchiolitis Infants with Hypertonic Saline by Small Volume Jet Nebulizer and Portable Vibrating-Mesh Nebulizer
    Chou, T.
    Chen, E.
    Liu, Y.
    Wu, I.
    Chien, M.
    Hsiao, H.
    Lai, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 197