Aerosol Delivery Using Jet Nebulizer and Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer During High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation: An In Vitro Comparison

被引:15
|
作者
Fang, Tien-Pei [1 ,6 ]
Lin, Hui-Ling [3 ]
Chiu, Shu-Hua [1 ]
Wang, Szu-Hui [1 ]
DiBlasi, Robert M. [4 ]
Tsai, Ying-Huang [2 ]
Fink, James B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Resp Therapy, Chiayi, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Chiayi, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Resp Therapy, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Dept Resp Therapy, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Georgia State Univ, Div Resp Therapy, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[6] Chang Gung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Resp Care, Chiayi Campus, Taiwan
关键词
aerosol delivery; breathing patterns; high frequency oscillatory ventilation; jet nebulizer; vibrating mesh nebulizer; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; FLOW; POSITION;
D O I
10.1089/jamp.2015.1265
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: High frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) is used in critically ill patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the efficiency of aerosol delivery with different lung parameters during simulated neonatal, pediatric, and adult HFOV. Methods: Sensormedics 3100A/B ventilators were used to deliver infant, pediatric, and adult HFOV. Two types of aerosol generators were chosen for testing: 1) a continuous jet nebulizer (JN) with a unit-dose of 5.0 mg/2.5 mL salbutamol sulfate diluted into 4 mL, and 2) a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) with salbutamol sulfate were run to completion of aerosol generation. Both aerosol devices were placed 1) between the ventilator circuit and the endotracheal tube (ETT) (proximal position); and 2) at the inlet of the heated humidifier (distal position) (n = 5). Drug was collected on a bacterial filter placed distal to the ETT, and the drug eluted and analyzed with a UV Spectrophotometer at 276 nm. T-test and ANOVA tests were used for comparison (p < 0.05). Results: The inhaled drug delivered by JN was 0%-0.6% of the nominal dose when placed at distal position, and 0%-3% at proximal position (p < 0.01), while the VMN was 0%-0.5% at distal and 8.6%-22.7% at proximal position (p < 0.01). Aerosol delivery during HFOV was greater with adult settings than pediatric and infant settings with VMN and JN (22.7%, 8.6%, and 17.4% respectively, p < 0.01). When the aerosol delivery device was placed at the distal position, negligible drug mass was observed (<0.5%), regardless of the nebulizer device used. Conclusions: During HFOV, aerosol delivery with the nebulizer placed at proximal was greater than placement distal from the ETT, with VMN delivering more drug than JN. The inhaled drug was delivery correlated positively with ETT size, MAP, and bias flow, and inversely proportional to power settings.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 453
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aerosol Delivery of Recombinant Human DNase I: In Vitro Comparison of a Vibrating-Mesh Nebulizer With a Jet Nebulizer
    Johnson, Jeremy C.
    Waldrep, J. Clifford
    Guo, Jennifer
    Dhand, Rajiv
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2008, 53 (12) : 1703 - 1708
  • [2] Factors influencing the in vitro deposition of tobramycin aerosol:: A comparison of an ultrasonic nebulizer and a high-frequency vibrating mesh nebulizer
    Pedersen, Kenneth Manby
    Handlos, Vagn Neerup
    Heslet, Lars
    Kristensen, Henning Gjelstrup
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG, 2006, 19 (02): : 175 - 183
  • [3] Influence of Inspiratory Flow Pattern and Nebulizer Position on Aerosol Delivery with a Vibrating-Mesh Nebulizer During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: An in Vitro Analysis
    Dugernier, Jonathan
    Wittebole, Xavier
    Roeseler, Jean
    Michotte, Jean-Bernard
    Sottiaux, Thierry
    Dugernier, Thierry
    Laterre, Pierre-Francois
    Reychler, Gregory
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2015, 28 (03) : 229 - 236
  • [4] Delivery Efficacy of a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and a Jet Nebulizer under Different Configurations
    Pitance, Laurent
    Vecellio, Laurent
    Leal, Teresinha
    Reychler, Gregory
    Reychler, Herve
    Liistro, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2010, 23 (06) : 389 - 396
  • [5] Evaluation of Aerosol Delivery with a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and a Breath Actuated Jet Nebulizer in a Spontaneous Breathing Patient Model
    Bennett, G.
    McKiernan, P.
    Fernandez, E. Fernandez
    Joyce, M.
    MacLoughlin, R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [6] The Effect of Different Interfaces on the Aerosol Delivery with Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer During Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation
    Tan, Wei
    Dai, Bing
    Lu, Chang-ling
    Hou, Hai-jia
    Zhao, Hong-wen
    Wang, Wei
    Kang, Jian
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2021, 34 (06) : 366 - 373
  • [7] Comparison of bronchodilator administration with vibrating mesh nebulizer and standard jet nebulizer in the emergency department
    Dunne, Robert B.
    Shortt, Sandra
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (04): : 641 - 646
  • [8] In vitro comparison between inspiration synchronized and continuous vibrating mesh nebulizer during trans-nasal aerosol delivery
    Jie Li
    Wei Wu
    James B. Fink
    Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 8
  • [9] In vitro comparison between inspiration synchronized and continuous vibrating mesh nebulizer during trans-nasal aerosol delivery
    Li, Jie
    Wu, Wei
    Fink, James B.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE EXPERIMENTAL, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [10] HIGH-EFFICIENCY ALBUTEROL DELIVERY IN SPONTANEOUSLY BREATHING PATIENTS: COMPARISON OF A VIBRATING MESH NEBULIZER AND NOVEL ADAPTER COMBINATION WITH A JET NEBULIZER
    Sweeney, Louise
    O'Sullivan, Andrew
    Wolny, Monika
    MacLoughlin, Ronan
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2015, 28 (03) : A23 - A24