Comparison of the Application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Feng, Zhouzhou [1 ]
Han, Zhengcai [1 ]
Wang, Yaqin [1 ]
Guo, Hong [1 ]
Liu, Jian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 1, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Gansu Cent Hosp, Gansu Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 1, Dept Clin Med, 1 Donggang West Rd, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
关键词
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; aerosol; vibrating mesh nebulizers; jet nebulizers; meta-analysis; AEROSOL DRUG-DELIVERY; METERED-DOSE INHALER; IN-VITRO; COPD; FLOW; VENTILATION; BRONCHODILATORS; DEVICES; SPACER;
D O I
10.2147/COPD.S452191
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To comparison of the application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Research Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statements. The primary outcome measures analyzed included: The amount of inhaler in the urine sample at 30 minutes after inhalation therapy (USAL0.5), The total amount of inhaler in urine sample within 24 hours (USAL24), Aerosol emitted, Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), Forced vital capacity (FVC). Results: Ten studies were included with a total of 314 study participants, including 157 subjects in the VMN group and 157 subjects in the JN group. The data analysis results of USAL0.5, MD (1.88 [95% CI, 0.95 to 2.81], P = 0.000), showed a statistically significant difference. USAL24, MD (1.61 [95% CI, 1.14 to 2.09], P = 0.000), showed a statistically significant difference. The results of aerosol emitted showed a statistically significant difference in MD (3.44 [95% CI, 2.84 to 4.04], P = 0.000). The results of FEV1 showed MD (0.05 [95% CI, -0.24 to 0.35], P=0.716), the results were not statistically significant. The results of FVC showed MD (0.11 [95% CI, -0.18 to 0.41], P=0.459), the results were not statistically significant. It suggests that VMN is better than JN and provides higher aerosols, but there is no difference in improving lung function between them. Conclusion: VMN is significantly better than JN in terms of drug delivery and utilization in the treatment of patients with COPD. However, in the future use of nebulizers, it is important to select a matching nebulizer based on a combination of factors such as mechanism of action of the nebulizer, disease type and comorbidities, ventilation strategies and modes, drug formulations, as well as cost-effectiveness, in order to achieve the ideal treatment of COPD.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 839
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inhaled therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Axson, Eleanor L.
    Lewis, Adam
    Potts, James
    Pang, Marie
    Dickinson, Scott
    Vioix, Helene
    Quint, Jennifer K.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [22] Effect of roflumilast on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shen, Lu-Fei
    Lv, Xiao-Dong
    Chen, Wen-Yu
    Yang, Qi
    Fang, Zhi-Xian
    Lu, Wei-Fen
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 187 (03) : 731 - 738
  • [23] Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cruz, Marina Malheiro
    Pereira, Marcos
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2020, 25 (11): : 4547 - 4557
  • [24] Home telehealth for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Polisena, Julie
    Tran, Khai
    Cimon, Karen
    Hutton, Brian
    McGill, Sarah
    Palmer, Krisan
    Scottt, Richard E.
    JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2010, 16 (03) : 120 - 127
  • [25] Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Yubo
    Tong, Hui
    Zhang, Xu
    Wang, Mengmeng
    Yang, Jiajia
    Wu, Meng
    Han, Renfang
    Chen, Mengya
    Hu, Xingxing
    Yuan, Yaping
    Pan, Guixia
    Zou, Yanfeng
    Xu, Shengqian
    Pan, Faming
    RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [26] A systematic review and meta-analysis of homocysteine concentrations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Zinellu, Angelo
    Zinellu, Elisabetta
    Pau, Maria Carmina
    Fois, Alessandro G.
    Mellino, Sabrina
    Piras, Barbara
    Scano, Valentina
    Fois, Sara S.
    Mangoni, Arduino A.
    Carru, Ciriaco
    Pirina, Pietro
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (03) : 751 - 758
  • [27] Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yubo Ma
    Hui Tong
    Xu Zhang
    Mengmeng Wang
    Jiajia Yang
    Meng Wu
    Renfang Han
    Mengya Chen
    Xingxing Hu
    Yaping Yuan
    Guixia Pan
    Yanfeng Zou
    Shengqian Xu
    Faming Pan
    Respiratory Research, 20
  • [28] Predictors of mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Owusuaa, Catherine
    Dijkland, Simone A.
    Nieboer, Daan
    van der Rijt, Carin C. D.
    van der Heide, Agnes
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [29] Anxiety and depression in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hou, Ruihua
    Miah, Alina
    BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY, 2023, 114 : 30 - 30
  • [30] Anxiety and depression in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Miah, Alina
    Hou, Ruihua
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62