Comparison of the Application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Feng, Zhouzhou [1 ]
Han, Zhengcai [1 ]
Wang, Yaqin [1 ]
Guo, Hong [1 ]
Liu, Jian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 1, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Gansu Cent Hosp, Gansu Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 1, Dept Clin Med, 1 Donggang West Rd, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
关键词
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; aerosol; vibrating mesh nebulizers; jet nebulizers; meta-analysis; AEROSOL DRUG-DELIVERY; METERED-DOSE INHALER; IN-VITRO; COPD; FLOW; VENTILATION; BRONCHODILATORS; DEVICES; SPACER;
D O I
10.2147/COPD.S452191
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To comparison of the application of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and Jet Nebulizer in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Research Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statements. The primary outcome measures analyzed included: The amount of inhaler in the urine sample at 30 minutes after inhalation therapy (USAL0.5), The total amount of inhaler in urine sample within 24 hours (USAL24), Aerosol emitted, Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), Forced vital capacity (FVC). Results: Ten studies were included with a total of 314 study participants, including 157 subjects in the VMN group and 157 subjects in the JN group. The data analysis results of USAL0.5, MD (1.88 [95% CI, 0.95 to 2.81], P = 0.000), showed a statistically significant difference. USAL24, MD (1.61 [95% CI, 1.14 to 2.09], P = 0.000), showed a statistically significant difference. The results of aerosol emitted showed a statistically significant difference in MD (3.44 [95% CI, 2.84 to 4.04], P = 0.000). The results of FEV1 showed MD (0.05 [95% CI, -0.24 to 0.35], P=0.716), the results were not statistically significant. The results of FVC showed MD (0.11 [95% CI, -0.18 to 0.41], P=0.459), the results were not statistically significant. It suggests that VMN is better than JN and provides higher aerosols, but there is no difference in improving lung function between them. Conclusion: VMN is significantly better than JN in terms of drug delivery and utilization in the treatment of patients with COPD. However, in the future use of nebulizers, it is important to select a matching nebulizer based on a combination of factors such as mechanism of action of the nebulizer, disease type and comorbidities, ventilation strategies and modes, drug formulations, as well as cost-effectiveness, in order to achieve the ideal treatment of COPD.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 839
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gaddam, Swarna
    Gunukula, Sameer K.
    Lohr, James W.
    Arora, Pradeep
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2016, 16
  • [42] Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Swarna Gaddam
    Sameer K. Gunukula
    James W. Lohr
    Pradeep Arora
    BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 16
  • [43] Exercise capacity and dyspnea challenge of adult chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) patients when using a novel mesh nebulizer compared to traditional jet nebulizer (TJN)
    Nickerson, Cheryl
    Von Hollen, Dirk
    Garbin, Sara
    Doty, Ketah
    Jasko, Jeff
    Cain, Chuck
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2020, 56
  • [44] A systematic review with meta-analysis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Chunrong Huang
    Yahui Liu
    Guochao Shi
    BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 20
  • [45] Glutathione Peroxidase in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zinellu, Elisabetta
    Zinellu, Angelo
    Pau, Maria Carmina
    Piras, Barbara
    Fois, Alessandro G.
    Mellino, Sabrina
    Carru, Ciriaco
    Mangoni, Arduino A.
    Pirina, Pietro
    ANTIOXIDANTS, 2021, 10 (11)
  • [46] The Qigong Wuqinxi for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Feng
    Xin, Mengxue
    Liu, Nan
    Huang, Na
    Lu, Jianhui
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (30)
  • [47] Handgrip Strength in People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Holden, Mackenzie
    Fyfe, Madeline
    Poulin, Camille
    Bethune, Brianna
    Church, Chloe
    Hepburn, Paula
    Afreixo, Vera
    Brooks, Dina
    Oliveira, Ana
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2021, 101 (06):
  • [48] The association between psoriasis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hyttel, Camilla Brinch
    Ghazanfar, Misbah N.
    Zhang, Ditte G.
    Thomsen, Simon F.
    Ali, Zarqa
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2024, 159 (03) : 329 - 335
  • [49] Baduanjin exercise for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cao, Ailing
    Feng, Fanchao
    Zhang, Li
    Zhou, Xianmei
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 34 (08) : 1004 - 1013
  • [50] Inflammatory Markers and the Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Su, Bin
    Liu, Tiansheng
    Fan, Haojun
    Chen, Feng
    Ding, Hui
    Wu, Zhouwei
    Wang, Hongwu
    Hou, Shike
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (04):