Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer

被引:9
|
作者
Blais, Christianne M. [1 ]
Cockcroft, Donald W. [1 ,2 ]
Veilleux, Justine [3 ]
Boulay, Marie-Eve [3 ]
Boulet, Louis-Philippe [3 ]
Gauvreau, Gail M. [4 ]
Scime, Tara X. [4 ]
Watson, Richard M. [4 ]
O'Byrne, Paul M. [4 ]
Davis, Beth E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Physiol, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Med, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
dose; methacholine challenge testing; nebulizer; standardization; PARTICLE-SIZE; REPRODUCIBILITY; HISTAMINE; OUTPUT; TESTS; FEV1;
D O I
10.1089/jamp.2017.1392
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The latest methacholine challenge testing (MCT) guidelines published by the European Respiratory Society recommend the characterization of nebulizers before their use in clinics and research. Such investigations are necessary for accurately determining the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20) delivered by a given device. The standard English Wright (Wright) jet nebulizer recommended in the 1999 guidelines by the American Thoracic Society has become difficult to obtain and possesses some characteristics that complicate the calculation of dose delivery from this device (e.g. evaporation). Our objective was to determine if the Aerogen (R) Solo (Solo) vibrating mesh nebulizer provides similar methacholine challenge test results compared to the currently used Wright jet nebulizer. Methods: Sixty mild-to-moderate asthmatics were studied across three research sites in a randomized crossover study. Bothmethacholine challenges were completed at least 24 hours apart within a 2-week period. Testingwith the Wright device was performed as per the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol. The Solo study arm followed the same procedure except for a shorter inhalation time of 1minute. The provocative concentration ofmethacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) and the methacholine PD20 were calculated following each methacholine challenge. Results: The geometric mean methacholine PC20 values for the Solo and the Wright differed statistically (0.65 mg/mL vs. 2.58 mg/mL, respectively, p < 0.00001) and clinically. Between-nebulizer geometric mean methacholine PD20 results are comparable by clinical standards [81.7 mu g (Solo) vs. 64.7 mu g (Wright)], although the slight difference in dose was statistically significant (p = 0.018). Conclusions: The comparability of PD20 values between the Solo and the Wright validates the importance of reporting airway responsiveness to methacholine in terms of dose and not concentration, as stressed in the latest testing guidelines. This finding along with several benefits associated with the Solo make it a promising nebulizer for performing MCT.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 93
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of bronchodilator administration with vibrating mesh nebulizer and standard jet nebulizer in the emergency department
    Dunne, Robert B.
    Shortt, Sandra
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (04): : 641 - 646
  • [2] Method of nebulizer calibration and methacholine airway responsiveness
    Davis, BE
    Todd, DC
    Cockcroft, DW
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2004, 114 (06) : 1474 - 1475
  • [3] Use of a vibrating mesh nebulizer for allergen challenge
    Cockcroft, Donald W.
    Davis, Beth E.
    Blais, Christianne M.
    Boulet, Louis-Philippe
    Boulay, Marie-Eve
    Villeneuve, Helene
    Gauvreau, Gail M.
    O'Byrne, Paul M.
    Howie, Karen J.
    Obminski, Caitlin D.
    ALLERGY ASTHMA AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 15 (01):
  • [4] Use of a vibrating mesh nebulizer for allergen challenge
    Donald W. Cockcroft
    Beth E. Davis
    Christianne M. Blais
    Louis-Philippe Boulet
    Marie-Éve Boulay
    Hélène Villeneuve
    Gail M. Gauvreau
    Paul M. O’Byrne
    Karen J. Howie
    Caitlin D. Obminski
    Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, 15
  • [5] Delivery Efficacy of a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer and a Jet Nebulizer under Different Configurations
    Pitance, Laurent
    Vecellio, Laurent
    Leal, Teresinha
    Reychler, Gregory
    Reychler, Herve
    Liistro, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2010, 23 (06) : 389 - 396
  • [6] PERFORMANCE OF A CONTACT-TRIGGERED VIBRATING MESH NEBULIZER: A COMPARISON TO TRADITIONAL MESH NEBULIZER
    Sang, Chen Hsiang
    Tasi, Wei Zhe
    Chiang, Chieh
    Kung, Liang Rern
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2020, 33 (02) : A27 - A27
  • [7] Bronchodilator Efficacy of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in COPD: Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus Jet Nebulizer
    Arunsurat, Itthiphat
    Rittayamai, Nuttapol
    Chuaychoo, Benjamas
    Tangchityongsiva, Suwat
    Promsarn, Simaporn
    Yuenyong, Somruthai
    Chow, Chung-Wai
    Brochard, Laurent
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2024, 69 (02) : 157 - 165
  • [8] Aerosol Delivery of Recombinant Human DNase I: In Vitro Comparison of a Vibrating-Mesh Nebulizer With a Jet Nebulizer
    Johnson, Jeremy C.
    Waldrep, J. Clifford
    Guo, Jennifer
    Dhand, Rajiv
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2008, 53 (12) : 1703 - 1708
  • [9] Aerosol Delivery Using Jet Nebulizer and Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer During High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation: An In Vitro Comparison
    Fang, Tien-Pei
    Lin, Hui-Ling
    Chiu, Shu-Hua
    Wang, Szu-Hui
    DiBlasi, Robert M.
    Tsai, Ying-Huang
    Fink, James B.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2016, 29 (05) : 447 - 453
  • [10] A Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer as an Alternative to the Collison Three-Jet Nebulizer for Infectious Disease Aerobiology
    Bowling, Jennifer D.
    O'Malley, Katherine J.
    Klimstra, William B.
    Hartman, Amy L.
    Reed, Douglas S.
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 85 (17)