Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer

被引:9
|
作者
Blais, Christianne M. [1 ]
Cockcroft, Donald W. [1 ,2 ]
Veilleux, Justine [3 ]
Boulay, Marie-Eve [3 ]
Boulet, Louis-Philippe [3 ]
Gauvreau, Gail M. [4 ]
Scime, Tara X. [4 ]
Watson, Richard M. [4 ]
O'Byrne, Paul M. [4 ]
Davis, Beth E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Physiol, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Med, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
dose; methacholine challenge testing; nebulizer; standardization; PARTICLE-SIZE; REPRODUCIBILITY; HISTAMINE; OUTPUT; TESTS; FEV1;
D O I
10.1089/jamp.2017.1392
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The latest methacholine challenge testing (MCT) guidelines published by the European Respiratory Society recommend the characterization of nebulizers before their use in clinics and research. Such investigations are necessary for accurately determining the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20) delivered by a given device. The standard English Wright (Wright) jet nebulizer recommended in the 1999 guidelines by the American Thoracic Society has become difficult to obtain and possesses some characteristics that complicate the calculation of dose delivery from this device (e.g. evaporation). Our objective was to determine if the Aerogen (R) Solo (Solo) vibrating mesh nebulizer provides similar methacholine challenge test results compared to the currently used Wright jet nebulizer. Methods: Sixty mild-to-moderate asthmatics were studied across three research sites in a randomized crossover study. Bothmethacholine challenges were completed at least 24 hours apart within a 2-week period. Testingwith the Wright device was performed as per the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol. The Solo study arm followed the same procedure except for a shorter inhalation time of 1minute. The provocative concentration ofmethacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) and the methacholine PD20 were calculated following each methacholine challenge. Results: The geometric mean methacholine PC20 values for the Solo and the Wright differed statistically (0.65 mg/mL vs. 2.58 mg/mL, respectively, p < 0.00001) and clinically. Between-nebulizer geometric mean methacholine PD20 results are comparable by clinical standards [81.7 mu g (Solo) vs. 64.7 mu g (Wright)], although the slight difference in dose was statistically significant (p = 0.018). Conclusions: The comparability of PD20 values between the Solo and the Wright validates the importance of reporting airway responsiveness to methacholine in terms of dose and not concentration, as stressed in the latest testing guidelines. This finding along with several benefits associated with the Solo make it a promising nebulizer for performing MCT.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 93
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] BRONCHIAL CHALLENGE - A SMALL RESERVOIR FOR THE WRIGHT JET NEBULIZER
    MADSEN, F
    NIELSEN, NH
    FROLUND, L
    SVENDSEN, UG
    WEEKE, B
    BULLETIN EUROPEEN DE PHYSIOPATHOLOGIE RESPIRATOIRE-CLINICAL RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 23 (01): : 67 - 71
  • [42] SPECT-CT Comparison of Lung Deposition using a System combining a Vibrating-mesh Nebulizer with a Valved Holding Chamber and a Conventional Jet Nebulizer: a Randomized Cross-over Study
    Jonathan Dugernier
    Michel Hesse
    Rita Vanbever
    Virginie Depoortere
    Jean Roeseler
    Jean-Bernard Michotte
    Pierre-François Laterre
    François Jamar
    Gregory Reychler
    Pharmaceutical Research, 2017, 34 : 290 - 300
  • [43] Performance and Feasibility of Therapeutic Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer for Ventilation Lung Scan
    Chih-Yung Chang
    Bang-Hung Yang
    Chien-Chih Ke
    Jing-Long Hsu
    Rong-Hong Jhou
    Wen-Yi Chang
    Nan-Jing Peng
    Ren-Shyan Liu
    Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 2022, 42 : 839 - 844
  • [44] COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO EXPERIMENTS FOR A JET NEBULIZER
    Lelong, N.
    Vecellio, L.
    de Gelicourt, Y. Sommer
    Tanguy, C.
    Diot, P.
    Suzanne, H.
    Junqua-Moullet, A.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 26 (02) : A25 - A25
  • [45] INHALED NEWS DRUGS AND BIODRUGS: PERFORMANCE OF A NEW VIBRATING MESH NEBULIZER
    Marchand, Denis
    Cabrera, Maria
    Pinel, Mathieu
    Vecellio, Laurent
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2015, 28 (03) : A17 - A18
  • [46] Comparative analysis of methods to measure aerosols generated by a vibrating mesh nebulizer
    Waldrep, J. C.
    Berlinski, A.
    Dhand, R.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG, 2007, 20 (03): : 310 - 319
  • [47] SPECT-CT Comparison of Lung Deposition using a System combining a Vibrating-mesh Nebulizer with a Valved Holding Chamber and a Conventional Jet Nebulizer: a Randomized Cross-over Study
    Dugernier, Jonathan
    Hesse, Michel
    Vanbever, Rita
    Depoortere, Virginie
    Roeseler, Jean
    Michotte, Jean-Bernard
    Laterre, Pierre-Francois
    Jamar, Francois
    Reychler, Gregory
    PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 34 (02) : 290 - 300
  • [48] That's cool! - Nebulization of thermolabile proteins with a cooled vibrating mesh nebulizer
    Hertel, Sebastian
    Pohl, Thomas
    Friess, Wolfgang
    Winter, Gerhard
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 2014, 87 (02) : 357 - 365
  • [49] An Evaluation Of Aerosol Output: The Aeroneb Solo Vibrating-Mesh Nebulizer
    Dubosky, M. N.
    Vines, D. L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [50] Performance and Feasibility of Therapeutic Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer for Ventilation Lung Scan
    Chang, Chih-Yung
    Yang, Bang-Hung
    Ke, Chien-Chih
    Hsu, Jing-Long
    Jhou, Rong-Hong
    Chang, Wen-Yi
    Peng, Nan-Jing
    Liu, Ren-Shyan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 42 (06) : 839 - 844