Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer

被引:9
|
作者
Blais, Christianne M. [1 ]
Cockcroft, Donald W. [1 ,2 ]
Veilleux, Justine [3 ]
Boulay, Marie-Eve [3 ]
Boulet, Louis-Philippe [3 ]
Gauvreau, Gail M. [4 ]
Scime, Tara X. [4 ]
Watson, Richard M. [4 ]
O'Byrne, Paul M. [4 ]
Davis, Beth E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Physiol, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Med, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
dose; methacholine challenge testing; nebulizer; standardization; PARTICLE-SIZE; REPRODUCIBILITY; HISTAMINE; OUTPUT; TESTS; FEV1;
D O I
10.1089/jamp.2017.1392
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The latest methacholine challenge testing (MCT) guidelines published by the European Respiratory Society recommend the characterization of nebulizers before their use in clinics and research. Such investigations are necessary for accurately determining the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20) delivered by a given device. The standard English Wright (Wright) jet nebulizer recommended in the 1999 guidelines by the American Thoracic Society has become difficult to obtain and possesses some characteristics that complicate the calculation of dose delivery from this device (e.g. evaporation). Our objective was to determine if the Aerogen (R) Solo (Solo) vibrating mesh nebulizer provides similar methacholine challenge test results compared to the currently used Wright jet nebulizer. Methods: Sixty mild-to-moderate asthmatics were studied across three research sites in a randomized crossover study. Bothmethacholine challenges were completed at least 24 hours apart within a 2-week period. Testingwith the Wright device was performed as per the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol. The Solo study arm followed the same procedure except for a shorter inhalation time of 1minute. The provocative concentration ofmethacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) and the methacholine PD20 were calculated following each methacholine challenge. Results: The geometric mean methacholine PC20 values for the Solo and the Wright differed statistically (0.65 mg/mL vs. 2.58 mg/mL, respectively, p < 0.00001) and clinically. Between-nebulizer geometric mean methacholine PD20 results are comparable by clinical standards [81.7 mu g (Solo) vs. 64.7 mu g (Wright)], although the slight difference in dose was statistically significant (p = 0.018). Conclusions: The comparability of PD20 values between the Solo and the Wright validates the importance of reporting airway responsiveness to methacholine in terms of dose and not concentration, as stressed in the latest testing guidelines. This finding along with several benefits associated with the Solo make it a promising nebulizer for performing MCT.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 93
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] IN-VITRO / IN-VIVO COMPARISON OF INHALED SALBUTAMOL DOSE DELIVERED BY JET NEBULIZER, VIBRATING MESH NEBULIZER AND METERED DOSE INHALER WITH SPACER IN NON-INVASIVE VENTILATION
    Hassan, Ahmed
    Eldin, Randa Salah
    Abdelrahman, Maha M.
    Abdelrahim, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2017, 30 (03) : 2 - 2
  • [32] A comparison of the delivery of inhaled drugs by jet nebulizer and vibrating mesh nebulizer using dual-source dual-energy computed tomography in rabbits: a preliminary in vivo study
    Wang, Qixing
    Liu, Yuhao
    Zhu, Zhengfang
    Hu, Jian
    Li, Li
    Wang, Sheng
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (17)
  • [33] INVESTIGATION OF EXCIPIENT PROPERTIES ON OUTPUT RATES IN A VIBRATING MESH NEBULIZER
    Cullen, S.
    Hibbitts, A.
    Tajber, Lidia
    MacLoughlin, R.
    Cryan, S. A.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 26 (02) : A32 - A32
  • [34] CHARACTERISATION OF EXTRACELLULAR VESICLE DELIVERY USING A VIBRATING MESH NEBULIZER
    Leime, Ciaran O.
    Gilligan, Katie
    Larkin, Celine
    McCauley, Gerry
    MacLoughlin, Ronan
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2023, 36 (06) : A31 - A31
  • [35] ACOUSTIC STRUCTURAL COUPLING IN A SILICON BASED VIBRATING MESH NEBULIZER
    Houlihan, Ruth
    Timothy, Michael
    Duffy, Conor
    MacLoughlin, Ronan
    Olszewski, Oskar
    2021 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOLID-STATE SENSORS, ACTUATORS AND MICROSYSTEMS (TRANSDUCERS), 2021, : 615 - 618
  • [36] The performance of a new vibrating mesh prototype nebulizer for inhaled biodrugs
    Marchand, Denis
    Maria, Cabrera
    Pinel, Mathieu
    Nicolini, Thibault
    Vecellio, Laurent
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2014, 44
  • [37] Comparison Of Aerosolization Of Rhcc10 Protein With Two Types Of Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer
    Kalampanayil, B.
    Fink, J.
    Telfer, C.
    Miller, T.
    Pilon, A. L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 195
  • [38] Evaluation Of A Vibrating-Mesh Nebulizer For The Delivery Of Inhaled Epoprostenol
    Bianchi, K.
    Dubosky, M. N.
    Kaplan, C. A.
    Vines, D. L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [39] In-vitro/in-vivo comparison of inhaled salbutamol dose delivered by jet nebulizer, vibrating mesh nebulizer and metered dose inhaler with spacer during non-invasive ventilation
    Hassan, Ahmed
    Eldin, Randa Salah
    Abdelrahman, Maha M.
    Abdelrahim, Mohamed E.
    EXPERIMENTAL LUNG RESEARCH, 2017, 43 (01) : 19 - 28
  • [40] AEROSOL DELIVERY FROM A VIBRATING MESH NEBULIZER WITH HOLDING CHAMBER IN HELIUM/OXYGEN VERSUS AIR
    Finlay, P.
    Martin, A. R.
    Katz, I. M.
    Vecellio, L.
    Caillibotte, G.
    Venegas, J. G.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 26 (02) : A20 - A20