Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Ziyue [1 ]
Chen, Yongliang [1 ]
Meng, Fanlei [1 ]
Shao, Qi [1 ]
Heal, Mathew R. [2 ]
Ren, Fengling [1 ]
Tang, Aohan [1 ]
Wu, Jiechen [3 ]
Liu, Xuejun [1 ]
Cui, Zhenling [1 ]
Xu, Wen [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Natl Acad Agr Green Dev, Key Lab Plant Soil Interact,Minist Educ,Natl Obse, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Chem, Joseph Black Bldg,David Brewster Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn SEED, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Peach production; Life cycle assessment; Environmental emission mitigation; Nutrient management; Farming practice; Peri-urban agriculture; FRUIT-QUALITY; MAIZE PRODUCTION; FERTILIZER USE; CROP LOAD; YIELD; SYSTEMS; APPLE; IRRIGATION; EFFICIENCY; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-19780-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While intensive peach production has expanded rapidly in recent years, few studies have explored the environmental impacts associated with specific regional systems or the optimal management strategies to minimize associated environmental risks. Here, data from a survey of 290 native farmers were used to conduct a life cycle assessment to quantify the acidification potential (AP), global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), and reactive nitrogen (Nr) losses in peach production in Pinggu District, Beijing. Total annual Nr losses, and GWP, AP, and EP values for peach production in Pinggu District were respectively 10.7 kg N t(-1), 857 kg CO2-eq t(-1), 12.9 kg SO2-eq t(-1), and 4.1 kg PO4-eq t(-1). The principal driving factors were fertilizer production, transportation, and application, which together accounted for 94%, 67%, 75%, and 94% of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP, respectively. In the high yield, high nitrogen-use efficiency (HH) group, relative values of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP were respectively 33%, 25%, 39%, and 32% lower than the overall averages for 290 orchards. Further analyses indicate that improved farming practices such as decreasing application rates of fertilizers, increasing proportion of base fertilization rate, and proper fertilization frequency in the HH group were the main reasons for these orchards' better performance in peach yields and partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer, and their reduced environmental impacts. These results highlight the need to optimize nutrient management in peach production in order simultaneously to realize both environmental sustainability and high productivity in the peach production system.
引用
收藏
页码:57190 / 57203
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China
    Ziyue Li
    Yongliang Chen
    Fanlei Meng
    Qi Shao
    Mathew R. Heal
    Fengling Ren
    Aohan Tang
    Jiechen Wu
    Xuejun Liu
    Zhenling Cui
    Wen Xu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 57190 - 57203
  • [2] Comparison on Environmental Impacts of Dairy Manure Management Methods in China: A Life Cycle Assessment
    Su, Ya
    Liang, Yuying
    Zhuo, Qianting
    Yin, Hongjie
    Fang, Chen
    Han, Lujia
    Huang, Guangqun
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2025,
  • [3] Integrating Protein Quality and Quantity with Environmental Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment
    Berardy, Andrew
    Johnston, Carol S.
    Plukis, Alexandra
    Vizcaino, Maricarmen
    Wharton, Christopher
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (10):
  • [4] Floods and consequential life cycle assessment: Integrating flood damage into the environmental assessment of stormwater Best Management Practices
    Petit-Boix, Anna
    Sevigne-Itoiz, Eva
    Rojas-Gutierrez, Lorena A.
    Barbassa, Ademir P.
    Josa, Alejandro
    Rieradevall, Joan
    Gabarrell, Xavier
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 162 : 601 - 608
  • [5] Life cycle environmental impacts assessment for residential buildings in China
    Gu, DJ
    Liu, JJ
    Gu, LJ
    INDOOR AIR 2005: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDOOR AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE, VOLS 1-5, 2005, : 3166 - 3170
  • [6] Life Cycle Assessment for highlighting environmental hotspots in Sicilian peach production systems
    Ingrao, Carlo
    Matarazzo, Agata
    Tricase, Caterina
    Clasadonte, Maria Teresa
    Huisingh, Donald
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 92 : 109 - 120
  • [7] Environmental impacts of extensive beef production in Colombia by life cycle assessment: a case study
    Arcila, Sara
    Correa, Natalia
    Pachón, Sebastián
    Valderrama, Luis Giraldo A.
    Cano-Londoño, Natalia A.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (43) : 55720 - 55735
  • [8] A Life Cycle Assessment Study of the Impacts of Pig Breeding on the Environmental Sustainability of Pig Production
    Thoma, Greg J.
    Baker, Banks
    Knap, Pieter W.
    ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (16):
  • [9] Environmental life cycle assessment and social impacts of bioethanol production in Thailand
    Papong, Seksan
    Rewlay-ngoen, Chantima
    Itsubo, Norihiro
    Malakul, Pomthong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 157 : 254 - 266
  • [10] Environmental impacts and resource use of milk production on the North China Plain, based on life cycle assessment
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    Ledgard, Stewart
    Luo, Jiafa
    Guo, Yongqin
    Zhao, Zhanqin
    Guo, Liang
    Liu, Song
    Zhang, Nannan
    Duan, Xueqin
    Ma, Lin
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 625 : 486 - 495