Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Ziyue [1 ]
Chen, Yongliang [1 ]
Meng, Fanlei [1 ]
Shao, Qi [1 ]
Heal, Mathew R. [2 ]
Ren, Fengling [1 ]
Tang, Aohan [1 ]
Wu, Jiechen [3 ]
Liu, Xuejun [1 ]
Cui, Zhenling [1 ]
Xu, Wen [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Natl Acad Agr Green Dev, Key Lab Plant Soil Interact,Minist Educ,Natl Obse, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Chem, Joseph Black Bldg,David Brewster Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn SEED, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Peach production; Life cycle assessment; Environmental emission mitigation; Nutrient management; Farming practice; Peri-urban agriculture; FRUIT-QUALITY; MAIZE PRODUCTION; FERTILIZER USE; CROP LOAD; YIELD; SYSTEMS; APPLE; IRRIGATION; EFFICIENCY; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-19780-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While intensive peach production has expanded rapidly in recent years, few studies have explored the environmental impacts associated with specific regional systems or the optimal management strategies to minimize associated environmental risks. Here, data from a survey of 290 native farmers were used to conduct a life cycle assessment to quantify the acidification potential (AP), global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), and reactive nitrogen (Nr) losses in peach production in Pinggu District, Beijing. Total annual Nr losses, and GWP, AP, and EP values for peach production in Pinggu District were respectively 10.7 kg N t(-1), 857 kg CO2-eq t(-1), 12.9 kg SO2-eq t(-1), and 4.1 kg PO4-eq t(-1). The principal driving factors were fertilizer production, transportation, and application, which together accounted for 94%, 67%, 75%, and 94% of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP, respectively. In the high yield, high nitrogen-use efficiency (HH) group, relative values of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP were respectively 33%, 25%, 39%, and 32% lower than the overall averages for 290 orchards. Further analyses indicate that improved farming practices such as decreasing application rates of fertilizers, increasing proportion of base fertilization rate, and proper fertilization frequency in the HH group were the main reasons for these orchards' better performance in peach yields and partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer, and their reduced environmental impacts. These results highlight the need to optimize nutrient management in peach production in order simultaneously to realize both environmental sustainability and high productivity in the peach production system.
引用
收藏
页码:57190 / 57203
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental impacts of olive oil production: a Life Cycle Assessment case study in the province of Messina (Sicily)
    Salomone, Roberta
    Ioppolo, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 28 : 88 - 100
  • [32] Accounting for the environmental impacts of sulfidic tailings storage in the Life Cycle Assessment of copper production: A case study
    Beylot, Antoine
    Villeneuve, Jacques
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 153 (01) : 139 - 145
  • [33] Evaluation of the environmental impacts of rice paddy production using life cycle assessment: case study in Bangladesh
    Jimmy A.N.
    Khan N.A.
    Hossain M.N.
    Sujauddin M.
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2017, 3 (4) : 1691 - 1705
  • [34] Environmental benefits of livestock manure management practices and technology by life cycle assessment
    Sandars, DL
    Audsley, E
    Cañete, C
    Cumby, TR
    Scotford, IM
    Williams, AG
    BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2003, 84 (03) : 267 - 281
  • [35] Integrating machine learning with life cycle assessment: a comprehensive review and guide for predicting environmental impacts
    Salla, Joao Victor Encide
    de Almeida, Tiago Agostinho
    Silva, Diogo Aparecido Lopes
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2025,
  • [36] Comparative analysis of methods for integrating various environmental impacts as a single index in life cycle assessment
    Ji, Changyoon
    Hong, Taehoon
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2016, 57 : 123 - 133
  • [37] Life cycle assessment of Colombian greenhouse tomato production based on farmer-level survey data
    Ricardo Bojaca, Carlos
    Wyckhuys, Kris A. G.
    Schrevens, Eddie
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 69 : 26 - 33
  • [38] Life cycle assessment of copper production: a case study in China
    Hong, Jinglan
    Chen, Yilu
    Liu, Juan
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Qi, Congcong
    Ye, Liping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (09): : 1814 - 1824
  • [39] Life cycle assessment of copper production: a case study in China
    Jinglan Hong
    Yilu Chen
    Juan Liu
    Xiaotian Ma
    Congcong Qi
    Liping Ye
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 1814 - 1824
  • [40] Reducing the environmental impacts of vitreous optical fiber production - A Life Cycle Impact Assessment
    Pinto, Julian T. M.
    Amaral, Karen J.
    Hartard, Susanne
    Janissek, Paulo R.
    Helling, Klaus
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 165 : 762 - 776