Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Ziyue [1 ]
Chen, Yongliang [1 ]
Meng, Fanlei [1 ]
Shao, Qi [1 ]
Heal, Mathew R. [2 ]
Ren, Fengling [1 ]
Tang, Aohan [1 ]
Wu, Jiechen [3 ]
Liu, Xuejun [1 ]
Cui, Zhenling [1 ]
Xu, Wen [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Natl Acad Agr Green Dev, Key Lab Plant Soil Interact,Minist Educ,Natl Obse, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Chem, Joseph Black Bldg,David Brewster Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn SEED, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Peach production; Life cycle assessment; Environmental emission mitigation; Nutrient management; Farming practice; Peri-urban agriculture; FRUIT-QUALITY; MAIZE PRODUCTION; FERTILIZER USE; CROP LOAD; YIELD; SYSTEMS; APPLE; IRRIGATION; EFFICIENCY; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-19780-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While intensive peach production has expanded rapidly in recent years, few studies have explored the environmental impacts associated with specific regional systems or the optimal management strategies to minimize associated environmental risks. Here, data from a survey of 290 native farmers were used to conduct a life cycle assessment to quantify the acidification potential (AP), global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), and reactive nitrogen (Nr) losses in peach production in Pinggu District, Beijing. Total annual Nr losses, and GWP, AP, and EP values for peach production in Pinggu District were respectively 10.7 kg N t(-1), 857 kg CO2-eq t(-1), 12.9 kg SO2-eq t(-1), and 4.1 kg PO4-eq t(-1). The principal driving factors were fertilizer production, transportation, and application, which together accounted for 94%, 67%, 75%, and 94% of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP, respectively. In the high yield, high nitrogen-use efficiency (HH) group, relative values of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP were respectively 33%, 25%, 39%, and 32% lower than the overall averages for 290 orchards. Further analyses indicate that improved farming practices such as decreasing application rates of fertilizers, increasing proportion of base fertilization rate, and proper fertilization frequency in the HH group were the main reasons for these orchards' better performance in peach yields and partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer, and their reduced environmental impacts. These results highlight the need to optimize nutrient management in peach production in order simultaneously to realize both environmental sustainability and high productivity in the peach production system.
引用
收藏
页码:57190 / 57203
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental impacts of peanut production system using life cycle assessment methodology
    Nikkhah, Amin
    Khojastehpour, Mehdi
    Emadi, Bagher
    Taheri-Rad, Alireza
    Khorramdel, Surur
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 92 : 84 - 90
  • [22] EVALUATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF FRUIT PRODUCTION USING LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA)
    Butcaru, Ana Cornelia
    Catuneanu, Ioana Laura
    Stanica, Florin
    Badulescu, Liliana
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES B-HORTICULTURE, 2021, 65 (02): : 11 - 18
  • [23] Assessing the environmental impacts of copper cathode production based on life cycle assessment
    Shahraki, Hamed
    Einollahipeer, Fatemeh
    Abyar, Hajar
    Erfani, Malihe
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 20 (04) : 1180 - 1190
  • [24] Use of life cycle assessment to characterize the environmental impacts of polyol production options
    Helling, Richard K.
    Russell, David A.
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2009, 11 (03) : 380 - 389
  • [25] Life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impacts of different wheat production systems
    Taki, Morteza
    Soheili-Fard, Farshad
    Rohani, Abbas
    Chen, Guangnan
    Yildizhan, Hasan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 : 195 - 207
  • [26] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of raw silk production in China
    Wu, Zhaoshan
    Xu, Wenqiang
    Wu, Xiongying
    Ding, Xuemei
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2025, 55 : 11 - 23
  • [27] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of titanium dioxide production in China
    Dai, Yue
    Dong, Huijuan
    Sun, Luxuan
    Li, Jinze
    Zhang, Tianyu
    Geng, Yong
    Liu, Zhe
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2024, 105
  • [28] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of green tea production in China
    Sun, Mengqi
    Jia, Xuexiu
    Yang, Dong
    Lu, Bin
    Han, Feng
    Shi, Feng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [29] Life cycle assessment on the environmental impacts of different pig manure management techniques
    Dong, Baocheng
    Song, Chengjun
    Li, Huibin
    Lin, Aijun
    Wang, Jiuchen
    Li, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 15 (03) : 78 - 84
  • [30] The environmental impacts of iron and steel industry: a life cycle assessment study
    Olmez, Gulnur Maden
    Dilek, Filiz B.
    Karanfil, Tanju
    Yetis, Ulku
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 130 : 195 - 201