Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Ziyue [1 ]
Chen, Yongliang [1 ]
Meng, Fanlei [1 ]
Shao, Qi [1 ]
Heal, Mathew R. [2 ]
Ren, Fengling [1 ]
Tang, Aohan [1 ]
Wu, Jiechen [3 ]
Liu, Xuejun [1 ]
Cui, Zhenling [1 ]
Xu, Wen [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Natl Acad Agr Green Dev, Key Lab Plant Soil Interact,Minist Educ,Natl Obse, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Chem, Joseph Black Bldg,David Brewster Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn SEED, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Peach production; Life cycle assessment; Environmental emission mitigation; Nutrient management; Farming practice; Peri-urban agriculture; FRUIT-QUALITY; MAIZE PRODUCTION; FERTILIZER USE; CROP LOAD; YIELD; SYSTEMS; APPLE; IRRIGATION; EFFICIENCY; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-19780-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While intensive peach production has expanded rapidly in recent years, few studies have explored the environmental impacts associated with specific regional systems or the optimal management strategies to minimize associated environmental risks. Here, data from a survey of 290 native farmers were used to conduct a life cycle assessment to quantify the acidification potential (AP), global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), and reactive nitrogen (Nr) losses in peach production in Pinggu District, Beijing. Total annual Nr losses, and GWP, AP, and EP values for peach production in Pinggu District were respectively 10.7 kg N t(-1), 857 kg CO2-eq t(-1), 12.9 kg SO2-eq t(-1), and 4.1 kg PO4-eq t(-1). The principal driving factors were fertilizer production, transportation, and application, which together accounted for 94%, 67%, 75%, and 94% of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP, respectively. In the high yield, high nitrogen-use efficiency (HH) group, relative values of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP were respectively 33%, 25%, 39%, and 32% lower than the overall averages for 290 orchards. Further analyses indicate that improved farming practices such as decreasing application rates of fertilizers, increasing proportion of base fertilization rate, and proper fertilization frequency in the HH group were the main reasons for these orchards' better performance in peach yields and partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer, and their reduced environmental impacts. These results highlight the need to optimize nutrient management in peach production in order simultaneously to realize both environmental sustainability and high productivity in the peach production system.
引用
收藏
页码:57190 / 57203
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Technology selection for hydrogen production in China by integrating emergy into life cycle sustainability assessment
    Li, Hui
    Yao, Xilong
    Tachega, Mark Awe
    Ahmed, Dulal
    Ismaail, Mohamed Gabir Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 294
  • [42] Global environmental impacts of silver nanoparticle production methods supported by life cycle assessment
    Temizel-Sekeryan S.
    Hicks A.L.
    Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 156
  • [43] Environmental impacts of wheat-based vodka production using life cycle assessment
    Bhattacharyya, Nirvan
    Goodell, Amy
    Rogers, Sarah
    Demond, Avery
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 : 642 - 648
  • [44] A review of the effectiveness of Life Cycle Assessment for gauging environmental impacts from cement production
    Ige, Oluwafemi E.
    Olanrewaju, Oludolapo A.
    Duffy, Kevin J.
    Obiora, Collins
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 324
  • [45] Environmental Impacts of the Beef Production Chain in the Northeast of Portugal Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Presumido, Pedro Henrique
    Sousa, Fernando
    Goncalves, Artur
    Dal Bosco, Tatiane Cristina
    Feliciano, Manuel
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2018, 8 (10):
  • [46] Global environmental impacts of silver nanoparticle production methods supported by life cycle assessment
    Temizel-Sekeryan, Sila
    Hicks, Andrea L.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 156
  • [47] The Life-cycle Assessment and Environmental Impacts of Electricity Production in Porto Santo Island
    Torabi, Roham
    Rizzoli, Nicolo
    Arosio, Valeria
    Morgado-Dias, F.
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY IN SMALL DEVELOPING ECONOMIES (ES2DE), 2017,
  • [48] The environmental impacts of commercial poultry production systems using life cycle assessment: a review
    Kheiralipour, Kamran
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Karimi, Mahmoud
    Nadimi, Mohammad
    Paliwal, Jitendra
    WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2024, 80 (01) : 33 - 54
  • [49] Consequential life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of an increased rapemethylester (RME) production in Switzerland
    Reinhard, Juergen
    Zah, Rainer
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (06): : 2361 - 2373
  • [50] Life Cycle Assessment of Pig Production in Central Portugal: Environmental Impacts and Sustainability Challenges
    Santos, Lenise
    Ferreira, Miguel
    Domingos, Idalina
    Oliveira, Veronica
    Rodrigues, Carla
    Ferreira, Antonio
    Ferreira, Jose
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (02)