A Life Cycle Assessment Study of the Impacts of Pig Breeding on the Environmental Sustainability of Pig Production

被引:0
|
作者
Thoma, Greg J. [1 ]
Baker, Banks [2 ]
Knap, Pieter W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Resilience Serv PLLC, 1282 S Sherman St, Denver, CO 80210 USA
[2] Genus PIC, 100 Bluegrass Commons Blvd, Hendersonville, TN 37075 USA
[3] Genus PIC, Lorbeerrosenweg 10, D-30916 Isernhagen, Germany
来源
ANIMALS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 16期
关键词
LCA; animal breeding; pig; environmental impact; climate change; global warming; PRODUCTION TRAITS; NITROGEN; EXCRETION; INDEXES; VALUES;
D O I
10.3390/ani14162435
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Pig production has environmental impacts such as global warming and eutrophication. This is closely linked to the feed efficiency of production, i.e., how much feed is required to produce a given quantity of pig meat; this depends on traits such as growth rate, feed intake, and litter size. Commercial pig breeding creates genetic improvement in those traits, and this should reduce the environmental impact. We applied two life cycle assessment (LCA) studies to quantify this reduction. In the first LCA, we compared the environmental impact of pigs in 2021 to the predicted impact for 2030, and we found a 7-9% improvement over those 9 years. In the second LCA, we compared the impact of pigs from a particular breeding company to the North American pig industry average, and we found that those pigs have a 7-8% lower impact. We conclude that commercial pig breeding delivers positive environmental outcomes as a result of its selection for production and reproduction traits.Abstract Lifecycle assessment (LCA) quantified changes in environmental impact categories (global warming, eutrophication, etc.) from 2021 to 2030 due to genetic trends in (re)production traits in pig lines of the breeding company Genus-PIC. The 2030 levels were projected with selection index theory based on weightings of traits in the breeding goals and genetic covariances among them. The projected improvement was 0.9% annually for most impact categories. Another LCA compared the impacts of 2021 North American pig production based on PIC genetics versus the industry average. Software openLCA converted material and energy flows to impact categories of frameworks ReCiPe-2016, PEF-3.1, and IPCC-2021. Flows came from data recorded by customers (1.1/4.7 million sows/finishing pigs) and by subscribers to a third-party data aggregator (1.3/9.1 million). PIC genetics have a 7-8% better impact than industry average for 13/18 categories of ReCiPe-2016, 19/25 of PEF-3.1, and all categories of IPCC-2001. Pig breeding delivers positive environmental outcomes as correlated responses to selection for profitability-oriented breeding goals. This trend is additive; technology development will increase it. Different investment levels in breeding population structure and technology and different operational efficiencies of breeding companies cause substantial differences in the environmental impact of pig production.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life Cycle Assessment as a Methodological Framework for the Evaluation of the Environmental Sustainability of Pig and Pork Production in Ecuador
    Pazmino, Mayra L.
    Ramirez, Angel D.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [2] Environmental Impacts Associated with Intensive Production in Pig Farms in Mexico through Life Cycle Assessment
    Rafael Giraldi-Diaz, Mario
    Castillo-Gonzalez, Eduardo
    De Medina-Salas, Lorena
    Velasquez-De la Cruz, Raul
    Daniel Huerta-Silva, Hector
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (20)
  • [3] Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment
    Dourmad, J. Y.
    Ryschawy, J.
    Trousson, T.
    Bonneau, M.
    Gonzalez, J.
    Houwers, H. W. J.
    Hviid, M.
    Zimmer, C.
    Nguyen, T. L. T.
    Morgensen, L.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2014, 8 (12) : 2027 - 2037
  • [4] Life cycle assessment on the environmental impacts of different pig manure management techniques
    Dong, Baocheng
    Song, Chengjun
    Li, Huibin
    Lin, Aijun
    Wang, Jiuchen
    Li, Wei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 15 (03) : 78 - 84
  • [5] Life Cycle Assessment of pig production: A case study in Galicia
    Noya, I.
    Villanueva-Rey, P.
    Gonzalez-Garcia, S.
    Fernandez, M. D.
    Rodriguez, M. R.
    Moreira, M. T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 142 : 4327 - 4338
  • [6] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF PIG PRODUCTION - A CASE STUDY IN MEXICAN FARM
    Villavicencio Gutierrez, Maria del Rosario
    Da Silva, Ana Lorga
    Flores, Miriam Paulino
    Martinez Castaneda, Francisco Ernesto
    Martinez Campos, Angel Roberto
    Matus Gardea, Jaime
    Gomez Tenorio, German
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ESD 2018): 35TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, 2018, : 734 - 741
  • [7] Effect of feeding strategy on environmental impacts of pig fattening in different contexts of production: evaluation through life cycle assessment
    Monteiro, A. N. T. R.
    Garcia-Launay, F.
    Brossard, L.
    Wilfart, A.
    Dourmad, J. -Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 (11) : 4832 - 4847
  • [8] Life Cycle Assessment for the Cuban pig production: Case study in Sancti Spiritus
    Alba Reyes, Yasmani
    Barrera, Ernesto L.
    Sarduy Valle, Anisley
    Perez Gil, Maylier
    Hermida Garcia, Orestes
    Dewulf, Jo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 219 : 99 - 109
  • [9] Life Cycle Assessment Perspective for Sectoral Adaptation to Climate Change: Environmental Impact Assessment of Pig Production
    Ndue, Kennedy
    Pal, Goda
    [J]. LAND, 2022, 11 (06)
  • [10] Environmental impacts of combining pig slurry acidification and separation under different regulatory regimes - A life cycle assessment
    ten Hoeve, Marieke
    Gomez-Munoz, Beatriz
    Jensen, Lars S.
    Bruun, Sander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 181 : 710 - 720