A Life Cycle Assessment Study of the Impacts of Pig Breeding on the Environmental Sustainability of Pig Production

被引:0
|
作者
Thoma, Greg J. [1 ]
Baker, Banks [2 ]
Knap, Pieter W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Resilience Serv PLLC, 1282 S Sherman St, Denver, CO 80210 USA
[2] Genus PIC, 100 Bluegrass Commons Blvd, Hendersonville, TN 37075 USA
[3] Genus PIC, Lorbeerrosenweg 10, D-30916 Isernhagen, Germany
来源
ANIMALS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 16期
关键词
LCA; animal breeding; pig; environmental impact; climate change; global warming; PRODUCTION TRAITS; NITROGEN; EXCRETION; INDEXES; VALUES;
D O I
10.3390/ani14162435
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Pig production has environmental impacts such as global warming and eutrophication. This is closely linked to the feed efficiency of production, i.e., how much feed is required to produce a given quantity of pig meat; this depends on traits such as growth rate, feed intake, and litter size. Commercial pig breeding creates genetic improvement in those traits, and this should reduce the environmental impact. We applied two life cycle assessment (LCA) studies to quantify this reduction. In the first LCA, we compared the environmental impact of pigs in 2021 to the predicted impact for 2030, and we found a 7-9% improvement over those 9 years. In the second LCA, we compared the impact of pigs from a particular breeding company to the North American pig industry average, and we found that those pigs have a 7-8% lower impact. We conclude that commercial pig breeding delivers positive environmental outcomes as a result of its selection for production and reproduction traits.Abstract Lifecycle assessment (LCA) quantified changes in environmental impact categories (global warming, eutrophication, etc.) from 2021 to 2030 due to genetic trends in (re)production traits in pig lines of the breeding company Genus-PIC. The 2030 levels were projected with selection index theory based on weightings of traits in the breeding goals and genetic covariances among them. The projected improvement was 0.9% annually for most impact categories. Another LCA compared the impacts of 2021 North American pig production based on PIC genetics versus the industry average. Software openLCA converted material and energy flows to impact categories of frameworks ReCiPe-2016, PEF-3.1, and IPCC-2021. Flows came from data recorded by customers (1.1/4.7 million sows/finishing pigs) and by subscribers to a third-party data aggregator (1.3/9.1 million). PIC genetics have a 7-8% better impact than industry average for 13/18 categories of ReCiPe-2016, 19/25 of PEF-3.1, and all categories of IPCC-2001. Pig breeding delivers positive environmental outcomes as correlated responses to selection for profitability-oriented breeding goals. This trend is additive; technology development will increase it. Different investment levels in breeding population structure and technology and different operational efficiencies of breeding companies cause substantial differences in the environmental impact of pig production.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental evaluation of transfer and treatment of excess pig slurry by life cycle assessment
    Lopez-Ridaura, Santiago
    van der Werf, Hayo
    Paillat, Jean Marie
    Le Bris, Bertrand
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (02) : 1296 - 1304
  • [22] Environmental impacts of extensive beef production in Colombia by life cycle assessment: a case study
    Arcila, Sara
    Correa, Natalia
    Pachón, Sebastián
    Valderrama, Luis Giraldo A.
    Cano-Londoño, Natalia A.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (43) : 55720 - 55735
  • [23] Environmental sustainability improvement in chloromethanes production based on life cycle assessment
    Zhou, Xinying
    Cheng, Ziyue
    Ren, Ke
    Zhai, Yijie
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Shen, Xiaoxu
    Bai, Yueyang
    Jia, Yuke
    Hong, Jinglan
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 34 : 105 - 113
  • [24] Environmental assessment of energy production from anaerobic digestion of pig manure at medium-scale using life cycle assessment
    Ramirez-Islas, Martha E.
    Patricia Guereca, Leonor
    Sosa-Rodriguez, Fabiola S.
    Cobos-Peralta, Mario A.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 102 : 85 - 96
  • [25] Environmental life cycle assessment and social impacts of bioethanol production in Thailand
    Papong, Seksan
    Rewlay-ngoen, Chantima
    Itsubo, Norihiro
    Malakul, Pomthong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 157 : 254 - 266
  • [26] Case study on environmental safety and sustainability of pharmaceutical production based on life cycle assessment of enrofloxacin
    Kong, Weixin
    Lv, Bihong
    Yang, Siqi
    Shen, Huazhen
    Jing, Guohua
    Zhou, Zuoming
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (04):
  • [27] Optimization of China's pig production system to reduce environmental impacts based on a data envelopment and life cycle analysis model
    Sun, Ruoyu
    Liu, Xianjun
    Li, Dabing
    Zhuang, Jie
    Qi, Shengrui
    Meng, Bo
    Liu, Mingda
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 185
  • [28] Programmed breeding in pig production
    Martinat-Botté, F
    Bussiere, J
    Guillouet, P
    Terqui, M
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 1996, 31 (03) : 473 - 476
  • [29] Effect of natural and regulatory conditions on the environmental impacts of pig slurry acidification across different regions in Europe: A life cycle assessment
    Beyers, Miriam
    Duan, Yun-Feng
    Jensen, Lars Stoumann
    Bruun, Sander
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 368
  • [30] Pig manure treatment with housefly (Musca domestica) rearing - an environmental life cycle assessment
    Roffeis, M.
    Muys, B.
    Almeida, J.
    Mathijs, E.
    Achten, W. M. J.
    Pastor, B.
    Velasquez, Y.
    Martinez-Sanchez, A. I.
    Rojo, S.
    JOURNAL OF INSECTS AS FOOD AND FEED, 2015, 1 (03) : 195 - 214