A Life Cycle Assessment Study of the Impacts of Pig Breeding on the Environmental Sustainability of Pig Production

被引:0
|
作者
Thoma, Greg J. [1 ]
Baker, Banks [2 ]
Knap, Pieter W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Resilience Serv PLLC, 1282 S Sherman St, Denver, CO 80210 USA
[2] Genus PIC, 100 Bluegrass Commons Blvd, Hendersonville, TN 37075 USA
[3] Genus PIC, Lorbeerrosenweg 10, D-30916 Isernhagen, Germany
来源
ANIMALS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 16期
关键词
LCA; animal breeding; pig; environmental impact; climate change; global warming; PRODUCTION TRAITS; NITROGEN; EXCRETION; INDEXES; VALUES;
D O I
10.3390/ani14162435
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Pig production has environmental impacts such as global warming and eutrophication. This is closely linked to the feed efficiency of production, i.e., how much feed is required to produce a given quantity of pig meat; this depends on traits such as growth rate, feed intake, and litter size. Commercial pig breeding creates genetic improvement in those traits, and this should reduce the environmental impact. We applied two life cycle assessment (LCA) studies to quantify this reduction. In the first LCA, we compared the environmental impact of pigs in 2021 to the predicted impact for 2030, and we found a 7-9% improvement over those 9 years. In the second LCA, we compared the impact of pigs from a particular breeding company to the North American pig industry average, and we found that those pigs have a 7-8% lower impact. We conclude that commercial pig breeding delivers positive environmental outcomes as a result of its selection for production and reproduction traits.Abstract Lifecycle assessment (LCA) quantified changes in environmental impact categories (global warming, eutrophication, etc.) from 2021 to 2030 due to genetic trends in (re)production traits in pig lines of the breeding company Genus-PIC. The 2030 levels were projected with selection index theory based on weightings of traits in the breeding goals and genetic covariances among them. The projected improvement was 0.9% annually for most impact categories. Another LCA compared the impacts of 2021 North American pig production based on PIC genetics versus the industry average. Software openLCA converted material and energy flows to impact categories of frameworks ReCiPe-2016, PEF-3.1, and IPCC-2021. Flows came from data recorded by customers (1.1/4.7 million sows/finishing pigs) and by subscribers to a third-party data aggregator (1.3/9.1 million). PIC genetics have a 7-8% better impact than industry average for 13/18 categories of ReCiPe-2016, 19/25 of PEF-3.1, and all categories of IPCC-2001. Pig breeding delivers positive environmental outcomes as correlated responses to selection for profitability-oriented breeding goals. This trend is additive; technology development will increase it. Different investment levels in breeding population structure and technology and different operational efficiencies of breeding companies cause substantial differences in the environmental impact of pig production.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using life cycle assessment to evaluate some environmental impacts of gold production
    Norgate, Terry
    Haque, Nawshad
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 29-30 : 53 - 63
  • [42] EVALUATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF FRUIT PRODUCTION USING LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA)
    Butcaru, Ana Cornelia
    Catuneanu, Ioana Laura
    Stanica, Florin
    Badulescu, Liliana
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES B-HORTICULTURE, 2021, 65 (02): : 11 - 18
  • [43] Environmental impacts of cocoa production and processing in Ghana: life cycle assessment approach
    Ntiamoah, Augustine
    Afrane, George
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (16) : 1735 - 1740
  • [44] Environmental impacts of peanut production system using life cycle assessment methodology
    Nikkhah, Amin
    Khojastehpour, Mehdi
    Emadi, Bagher
    Taheri-Rad, Alireza
    Khorramdel, Surur
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 92 : 84 - 90
  • [45] Assessing the environmental impacts of copper cathode production based on life cycle assessment
    Shahraki, Hamed
    Einollahipeer, Fatemeh
    Abyar, Hajar
    Erfani, Malihe
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 20 (04) : 1180 - 1190
  • [46] Use of life cycle assessment to characterize the environmental impacts of polyol production options
    Helling, Richard K.
    Russell, David A.
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2009, 11 (03) : 380 - 389
  • [47] Life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impacts of different wheat production systems
    Taki, Morteza
    Soheili-Fard, Farshad
    Rohani, Abbas
    Chen, Guangnan
    Yildizhan, Hasan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 : 195 - 207
  • [48] The environmental impacts of iron and steel industry: a life cycle assessment study
    Olmez, Gulnur Maden
    Dilek, Filiz B.
    Karanfil, Tanju
    Yetis, Ulku
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 130 : 195 - 201
  • [49] Comparing environmental impact of air scrubbers for ammonia abatement at pig houses: A life cycle assessment
    De Vries, Jerke W.
    Melse, Roland W.
    BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2017, 161 : 53 - 61
  • [50] Correction to: An approach to achieve overall farm feed efficiency in pig production: environmental evaluation through individual life cycle assessment
    Tara Soleimani
    Helene Gilbert
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1298 - 1299