Using life cycle assessment to evaluate some environmental impacts of gold production

被引:115
|
作者
Norgate, Terry [1 ]
Haque, Nawshad [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Minerals Flagship, Clayton, Vic 3169, Australia
关键词
Gold production; Environmental; Energy; Greenhouse; Water; Ore grade; SMALL-SCALE GOLD; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; MINING-INDUSTRY; THIOSULFATE; CYANIDE; MERCURY; ENERGY; TRENDS; WORLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.042
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The environmental profile of gold production with regards to embodied energy, greenhouse gas emissions, embodied water and solid waste burden has been assessed using life cycle assessment methodology. Both refractory and non-refractory ores were considered, with cyanidation extraction followed by carbon in pulp (CIP) recovery assumed for non-refractory ore processing. Flotation and pressure oxidation were included prior to cyanidation for processing refractory ores. For a base case ore grade of 3.5 g Au/t ore, the life cycle-based environmental footprint of gold production was estimated to be approximately 200,000 GJ/t Au, 18,000 t CO(2)e/t Au, 260,000 t water/t Au and 1,270,000 t waste solids/t Au for non-refractory ore. The embodied energy and greenhouse gas footprints were approximately 50% higher with refractory ore due to the additional material and energy inputs and gold and silver losses associated with the additional processing steps required with this ore. The solid waste burden was based on an assumed strip ratio of 3 t waste rock/t ore, but this ratio varies considerably between mines, significantly influencing the estimated value of this impact. The environmental footprint of gold production (per tonne of gold produced) was shown to be several orders of magnitude greater than that for a number of other metals, largely due to the low grades of ore used for the production of gold compared to other metals. The mining and comminution stages made the greatest contribution to the greenhouse gas footprint of gold production, with electricity being the major factor, and being responsible for just over half of the greenhouse gas footprint. This result emphasises the need to focus on these stages in any endeavours to reduce the embodied energy and greenhouse gas footprints of gold production. However, the significance of the contribution of the mining and comminution stages to the environmental footprint also means that falling gold ore grades will have a major impact on the environmental profile, and this issue is examined in the paper. Some technological developments in gold ore processing that have the potential to reduce the environmental footprint of gold production are also discussed. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 63
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental impacts of peanut production system using life cycle assessment methodology
    Nikkhah, Amin
    Khojastehpour, Mehdi
    Emadi, Bagher
    Taheri-Rad, Alireza
    Khorramdel, Surur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 92 : 84 - 90
  • [2] EVALUATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF FRUIT PRODUCTION USING LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA)
    Butcaru, Ana Cornelia
    Catuneanu, Ioana Laura
    Stanica, Florin
    Badulescu, Liliana
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES B-HORTICULTURE, 2021, 65 (02): : 11 - 18
  • [3] Leveraging life cycle assessment to evaluate environmental impacts of green cleaning products
    Van Lieshout, Kathryn G.
    Bayley, Cindy
    Akinlabi, Sarah O.
    von Rabenau, Lisa
    Dornfeld, David
    [J]. 22ND CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, 2015, 29 : 372 - 377
  • [4] Environmental impacts of wheat-based vodka production using life cycle assessment
    Bhattacharyya, Nirvan
    Goodell, Amy
    Rogers, Sarah
    Demond, Avery
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 : 642 - 648
  • [5] Environmental Impacts of the Beef Production Chain in the Northeast of Portugal Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Presumido, Pedro Henrique
    Sousa, Fernando
    Goncalves, Artur
    Dal Bosco, Tatiane Cristina
    Feliciano, Manuel
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2018, 8 (10):
  • [6] The environmental impacts of commercial poultry production systems using life cycle assessment: a review
    Kheiralipour, Kamran
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Karimi, Mahmoud
    Nadimi, Mohammad
    Paliwal, Jitendra
    [J]. WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2024, 80 (01) : 33 - 54
  • [7] The effects of energy consumption of alumina production in the environmental impacts using life cycle assessment
    Javier Sáez-Guinoa
    Enrique García-Franco
    Eva Llera-Sastresa
    Luis M. Romeo
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2024, 29 : 380 - 393
  • [8] The effects of energy consumption of alumina production in the environmental impacts using life cycle assessment
    Saez-Guinoa, Javier
    Garcia-Franco, Enrique
    Llera-Sastresa, Eva
    Romeo, Luis M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (03): : 380 - 393
  • [9] Life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of arable crop production
    Brentrup, F
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (03): : 156 - 156
  • [10] Life Cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of arable crop production
    Frank Brentrup
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2003, 8 : 156 - 156