Environmental assessment of energy production from anaerobic digestion of pig manure at medium-scale using life cycle assessment

被引:46
|
作者
Ramirez-Islas, Martha E. [1 ]
Patricia Guereca, Leonor [2 ]
Sosa-Rodriguez, Fabiola S. [3 ]
Cobos-Peralta, Mario A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Metropolitana Iztapalapa, Av San Rafael Atlixco 186, Mexico City 09340, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ingn, Circuito Escolar S-N,Ciudad Univ, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[3] Univ Autonoma Metropolitana Azcapotzalco, Av San Pablo 180 Col Reynosa Tamaulipas, Mexico City 02200, DF, Mexico
[4] Colegio Postgrad, Campus Montecillo, Texcoco 56230, State Of Mexico, Mexico
关键词
LCA; Pig manure; Energy production; Anaerobic digestion; Biogas flaring; Medium-scale; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; GREENHOUSE-GAS; CO-DIGESTION; TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES; SLURRY TREATMENT; MANAGEMENT; EMISSIONS; STORAGE; IMPACT; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study assessed the potential environmental effects of energy production from pig manure treatment by anaerobic digestion at medium-scale based on the Life Cycle Assessment of a farm in Puebla, Mexico. It also compared the results from common practices of biogas flaring and conventional management. The analysis was based on one ton of pig manure in 4 systems: two with energy production, one with biogas flaring, and the last one conventional management. The use of biogas for electricity production combined with composting techniques generated the lowest net impacts on climate change of 272 kg CO(2)eq and photochemical oxidation of 0.056 kg ethylene eq, while the biogas flaring registered impacts of 344 kg CO(2)eq and 0.095 kg ethylene eq. The systems with energy production had environmental benefits on fossil resources depletion by avoiding the consumption of -863 MJ and -1608 MJ, but systems that burned biogas required fossil fuel consumption of 246 MJ from the grid. The conventional management generated the greatest environmental impacts, with eutrophication being the most important negative effect due to the manure discharge into water bodies (5.97 kg PO(4)eq). Sensitivity analysis shown that energy production could generate greater impacts on global warming compared to the case in which manure was used directly in crop fields, if emissions from unintentional releases and a poor digestate management are not avoided. Results are relevant for developing countries in which processes are carried out in rural and semi-industrial areas with lack of technical knowledge and economic resources. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 96
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of the use of nanomaterials in biogas production from anaerobic digestion of manure
    Hijazi, O.
    Abdelsalam, E.
    Samer, M.
    Attia, Y. A.
    Amer, B. M. A.
    Amer, M. A.
    Badr, M.
    Bernhardt, H.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 148 : 417 - 424
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of the use of laser radiation in biogas production from anaerobic digestion of manure
    Abdelsalam, E.
    Hijazi, O.
    Samer, M.
    Yacoub, I. H.
    Ali, A. S.
    Ahmed, R. H.
    Bernhardt, H.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 142 : 130 - 136
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of anaerobic digestion of pig manure coupled with different digestate treatment technologies
    Duan, Na
    Khoshnevisan, Benyamin
    Lin, Cong
    Liu, Zhidan
    Liu, Hongbin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 137
  • [4] Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production in Italy from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and energy crops
    Lijo, Lucia
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Fiala, Marco
    Feijoo, Gumersindo
    Lema, Juan M.
    Teresa Moreira, Maria
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 68 : 625 - 635
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts and energy efficiency of an integration of sludge anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis
    Li, Huan
    Feng, Kai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 195 : 476 - 485
  • [6] Life cycle assessment on the environmental impacts of different pig manure management techniques
    Dong, Baocheng
    Song, Chengjun
    Li, Huibin
    Lin, Aijun
    Wang, Jiuchen
    Li, Wei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 15 (03) : 78 - 84
  • [7] Environmental and economic life cycle assessment of energy recovery from sewage sludge through different anaerobic digestion pathways
    Li, Huan
    Jin, Chang
    Zhang, Zhanying
    O'Hara, Ian
    Mundree, Sagadevan
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 126 : 649 - 657
  • [8] Environmental life cycle assessment of nano-cellulose and biogas production from manure
    Krexner, Theresa
    Bauer, Alexander
    Zollitsch, Werner
    Weiland, Kathrin
    Bismarck, Alexander
    Gronauer, Andreas
    Kral, Iris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 314
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of a small-scale anaerobic digestion plant from cattle waste
    Mezzullo, William G.
    McManus, Marcelle C.
    Hammond, Geoff P.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 102 : 657 - 664
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of biogas production through anaerobic co-digestion of nopal cladodes and dairy cow manure
    Rafael Ramirez-Arpide, Felix
    Demirer, Goksel N.
    Gallegos-Vazquez, Clemente
    Hernandez-Eugenio, Guadalupe
    Horacio Santoyo-Cortes, Vinicio
    Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 2313 - 2322