Environmental life cycle assessment of nano-cellulose and biogas production from manure

被引:12
|
作者
Krexner, Theresa [1 ]
Bauer, Alexander [1 ]
Zollitsch, Werner [2 ]
Weiland, Kathrin [3 ]
Bismarck, Alexander [3 ]
Gronauer, Andreas [1 ]
Kral, Iris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Inst Agr Engn, Peter Jordan Str 82, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Div Livestock Sci, Gregor Mendel Str 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Vienna, Inst Mat Chem & Res, Fac Chem, Polymer & Composite Engn PaCE Grp, Wa hringer Str 42, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Nano-cellulose; Biogas; Kraft pulp; Fermentation residue; Manure; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; PULP; PRETREATMENT; FUTURE; FOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115093
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Due to its unique properties, nano fibrillated cellulose (NFC) has been a popular topic of research in recent years. Nevertheless, literature assessing environmental impacts of NFC production is scarce, especially for using other starting materials than wood pulp. Hence, in this study, a new approach of cascaded use of manure to produce biogas and subsequently use the cellulose containing digestate for NFC production (manure scenario) is compared to the production from Kraft pulp from hardwood chips (wood chips scenario) via life cycle assessment (LCA). To produce comparable outputs (NFC and biogas) in both scenarios a typical Austrian biogas plant with maize silage and pig slurry as input material is included in the wood chips scenario. A proxy approach is used to upscale the manure scenario from laboratory to an industrial scale (except for the pulp to NFC step) to ensure comparability of both scenarios. The impact categories global warming potential (GWP), fossil resource scarcity, freshwater eutrophication, human toxicity, terrestrial acidification (TAP) and terrestrial ecotoxicity potential are analysed referring to the functional unit of 1 kg NFC. Results show that the manure scenario has at least 45% lower impacts in all assessed categories. GWP is 4.41 kg CO2 eq./kg NFC in the manure and 9.74 kg CO2 eq./kg NFC in the wood chips scenario. The transformation step from pulp to NFC is identified as environmental hotspot due to the high electricity demand in both scenarios. Results are additionally assessed only for the industrial scale part (includes biogas and pulp production). In the latter the main difference can be found in the substrate production. While it plays a subordinate role in the manure scenario (up to 8%) as manure is seen as a waste stream with no upstream environmental impacts attached, the production of maize silage is one of the hotspots in the industrial part in the wood chips scenario. This difference is especially prominent in TAP, where the substrate production is responsible for 91% of the 0.06 kg SO2 eq. impact, which is tenfold the impact of the manure scenario. This underlines the issue of using energy crops as substrate in biogas plants. It also highlights the importance of further research of using waste streams as inputs for the electricity production and subsequent use in the pulp and paper industry. This LCA demonstrates that NFC production from manure is a sustainable alternative to the production from hardwood Kraft pulp.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of manure biogas production: A review
    Mano Esteves, Elisa Maria
    Naranjo Herrera, Ana Maria
    Pecanha Esteves, Victor Paulo
    Vaz Morgado, Claudia do Rosario
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 219 : 411 - 423
  • [2] Exploring the environmental and economic potential for biogas production from swine manure wastewater by life cycle assessment
    Meng-Fen Shih
    Chyi-How Lay
    Chiu-Yue Lin
    Shen-Ho Chang
    [J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2023, 25 : 451 - 464
  • [3] Exploring the environmental and economic potential for biogas production from swine manure wastewater by life cycle assessment
    Shih, Meng-Fen
    Lay, Chyi-How
    Lin, Chiu-Yue
    Chang, Shen-Ho
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2023, 25 (02) : 451 - 464
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of the use of nanomaterials in biogas production from anaerobic digestion of manure
    Hijazi, O.
    Abdelsalam, E.
    Samer, M.
    Attia, Y. A.
    Amer, B. M. A.
    Amer, M. A.
    Badr, M.
    Bernhardt, H.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 148 : 417 - 424
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of the use of laser radiation in biogas production from anaerobic digestion of manure
    Abdelsalam, E.
    Hijazi, O.
    Samer, M.
    Yacoub, I. H.
    Ali, A. S.
    Ahmed, R. H.
    Bernhardt, H.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 142 : 130 - 136
  • [6] Environmental assessment of Micro/Nano production in a life cycle perspective
    Olsen, Stig Irving
    Jorgensen, Michael Sogaard
    [J]. LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS TOOLS FOR GREEN MATERIALS AND PROCESS SELECTION, 2006, 895 : 159 - +
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from biogas reforming
    Hajjaji, Noureddine
    Martinez, Sylvain
    Trably, Eric
    Steyer, Jean-Philippe
    Helias, Arnaud
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (14) : 6064 - 6075
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of bioethanol production from cattle manure
    de Azevedo, Amaro
    Fornasier, Franccesca
    Szarblewski, Mateus da Silva
    de Souza Schneider, Rosana de Cassia
    Hoeltz, Michele
    de Souza, Diego
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 162 : 1021 - 1030
  • [9] Comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of biogas production from marine algae and cattle manure biorefineries
    Giwa, Adewale
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 244 : 1470 - 1479
  • [10] Environmental life cycle assessment of biogas production from marine macroalgal feedstock for the substitution of energy crops
    Ertem, Funda Cansu
    Neubauer, Peter
    Junne, Stefan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 : 977 - 985