Environmental life cycle assessment of nano-cellulose and biogas production from manure

被引:14
|
作者
Krexner, Theresa [1 ]
Bauer, Alexander [1 ]
Zollitsch, Werner [2 ]
Weiland, Kathrin [3 ]
Bismarck, Alexander [3 ]
Gronauer, Andreas [1 ]
Kral, Iris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Inst Agr Engn, Peter Jordan Str 82, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Div Livestock Sci, Gregor Mendel Str 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Vienna, Inst Mat Chem & Res, Fac Chem, Polymer & Composite Engn PaCE Grp, Wa hringer Str 42, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Nano-cellulose; Biogas; Kraft pulp; Fermentation residue; Manure; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; PULP; PRETREATMENT; FUTURE; FOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115093
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Due to its unique properties, nano fibrillated cellulose (NFC) has been a popular topic of research in recent years. Nevertheless, literature assessing environmental impacts of NFC production is scarce, especially for using other starting materials than wood pulp. Hence, in this study, a new approach of cascaded use of manure to produce biogas and subsequently use the cellulose containing digestate for NFC production (manure scenario) is compared to the production from Kraft pulp from hardwood chips (wood chips scenario) via life cycle assessment (LCA). To produce comparable outputs (NFC and biogas) in both scenarios a typical Austrian biogas plant with maize silage and pig slurry as input material is included in the wood chips scenario. A proxy approach is used to upscale the manure scenario from laboratory to an industrial scale (except for the pulp to NFC step) to ensure comparability of both scenarios. The impact categories global warming potential (GWP), fossil resource scarcity, freshwater eutrophication, human toxicity, terrestrial acidification (TAP) and terrestrial ecotoxicity potential are analysed referring to the functional unit of 1 kg NFC. Results show that the manure scenario has at least 45% lower impacts in all assessed categories. GWP is 4.41 kg CO2 eq./kg NFC in the manure and 9.74 kg CO2 eq./kg NFC in the wood chips scenario. The transformation step from pulp to NFC is identified as environmental hotspot due to the high electricity demand in both scenarios. Results are additionally assessed only for the industrial scale part (includes biogas and pulp production). In the latter the main difference can be found in the substrate production. While it plays a subordinate role in the manure scenario (up to 8%) as manure is seen as a waste stream with no upstream environmental impacts attached, the production of maize silage is one of the hotspots in the industrial part in the wood chips scenario. This difference is especially prominent in TAP, where the substrate production is responsible for 91% of the 0.06 kg SO2 eq. impact, which is tenfold the impact of the manure scenario. This underlines the issue of using energy crops as substrate in biogas plants. It also highlights the importance of further research of using waste streams as inputs for the electricity production and subsequent use in the pulp and paper industry. This LCA demonstrates that NFC production from manure is a sustainable alternative to the production from hardwood Kraft pulp.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life Cycle Assessment of Biogas Production from Marine Macroalgae: a Latvian Scenario
    Pilicka, Iluta
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    Romagnoli, Francesco
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 6 (01) : 69 - 78
  • [22] Life cycle assessment on biogas production from straw and its sensitivity analysis
    Wang, Qiao-Li
    Li, Wei
    Gao, Xiang
    Li, Su-Jing
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 201 : 208 - 214
  • [23] Optimal production of power in a combined cycle from manure based biogas
    Leon, Erick
    Martin, Mariano
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 114 : 89 - 99
  • [24] Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Assessment of Different Biogas and Biogas Residue Operation Models
    Guan, Jinghua
    Li, Ningzhou
    Li, Haiying
    Yao, Xin
    Long, Yue
    Wang, Shaolong
    Ji, Aimin
    Xue, Yuekai
    PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (10)
  • [25] Choosing co-substrates to supplement biogas production from animal slurry - A life cycle assessment of the environmental consequences
    Vega, Giovanna Catalina Croxatto
    ten Hoeve, Marieke
    Birkved, Morten
    Sommer, Sven G.
    Bruun, Sander
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 171 : 410 - 420
  • [26] Life Cycle Assessment of vinasse biogas production in sugarcane biorefineries
    Longati, Andreza A.
    Cavalett, Otavio
    Cruz, Antonio J. G.
    27TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PT B, 2017, 40B : 2017 - 2022
  • [27] Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production
    Berglund, M
    Börjesson, P
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (03): : 254 - 266
  • [28] Life cycle assessment of biogas production through anaerobic co-digestion of nopal cladodes and dairy cow manure
    Rafael Ramirez-Arpide, Felix
    Demirer, Goksel N.
    Gallegos-Vazquez, Clemente
    Hernandez-Eugenio, Guadalupe
    Horacio Santoyo-Cortes, Vinicio
    Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 2313 - 2322
  • [29] Environmental impacts of biogas deployment - Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways
    Poeschl, Martina
    Ward, Shane
    Owende, Philip
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 24 : 184 - 201
  • [30] Life cycle assessment of biogas production from mixtures of vinasse and concentrated latex wastewater
    Usubharatana, Phairat
    Sakdamnoensakul, Thiwawan
    Chongchit, Kanchana
    Phungrassami, Harnpon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30 (02) : 203 - 220